Ajzen, Icek (1985) “From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviour”. In Action control: from cognition to behaviour, 11–39. Julius Kuhl and Jürgen Beckmann, eds. Heidelberg: Springer.
Ajzen, Icek (2001) “Nature and operation of attitudes”. Annual Review of Psychology 52, 27–58.
doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27
Amato, Paul and Alan Booth (1997) A Generation at risk. growing up in an era of family upheaval. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Axinn, William G. and Jennifer S. Barber (1997) “Living arrangements and family formation attitudes in early adulthood”. Journal of Marriage and Family 59, 3, 595–611.
doi:10.2307/353948
Axinn, William.G. and Arland Thornton (1992) “The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: selectivity or casual influence?”. Demography 29, 3, 357–374.
doi:10.2307/2061823
Baanders, Arianne N. (1998) Leavers, planners and dwellers: the decision to leave the parental home. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.
Barber, Jennifer S. (2000) “Intergenerational influences on the entry into parenthood: mothers` preferences for family and nonfamily behavior”. Social Forces 79, 1, 319–348.
doi:10.2307/2675573
Bernhardt, Eva, Michael Gähler, and Frances Goldscheider (2005) “Childhood family structure and routes out of the parental home in Sweden”. Acta Sociologica. Journal of Scandinavian Sociological Association 48, 2, 99–115.
Berrington, Ann (2001) “Entry into parenthood and the outcome of cohabiting partnership in Britain”. Journal of Marriage and Family 63, 1, 80–97.
doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00080.x
Brines, Julie and Kara Joyner (1999) “The ties that bind: principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage”. American Sociological Review 64, 333–355.
doi:10.2307/2657490
Brown, Susan L. (2000) “Union transition among cohabitation: the significance of relationship assessments and expectations”. Journal of Marriage and Family 62, 3, 833–846.
doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00833.x
Bumpass, Larry L. (1990) “What’s happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change”. Demography, 27, 4: 483–498.
doi:10.2307/2061566
Bumpass, Larry L. and James A. Sweet (1989) “National estimates of cohabitation” Demography 26, 4, 615–625.
doi:10.2307/2061261
Bumpass, Larry L., James A. Sweet, and Andrew Cherlin (1991) “The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage”. Journal of Marriage and Family 53, 4, 913–927.
doi:10.2307/352997
Bumpass, Larry L. and Hsien-Hen Lu (2000) “Trends in cohabitation and implications for children`s family context in the United States”. Population Studies 54, 29–41.
doi:10.1080/713779060
Carlson, Marcia, Sara McLanahan, and Paula England (2004) “Union formation in fragile families”.Demography 41, 237–261.
doi:10.1353/dem.2004.0012
Cherlin, Andrew J. (2004) “The deinstitutionalization of American marriage”. Journal of Marriage and Family 66, 848–861.
doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x
Clarkberg, Marin, Ross M. Stolzenberg, and Linda J. Waite (1995) “Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions”. Social Forces 74, 2, 609–634.
doi:10.2307/2580494
Cohan, Catherine L. and Stacey Kleinbaum (2002) “Toward a greater understanding of the cohabitation effect: premarital cohabitation and marital communication”. Journal of Marriage and Family 64, 180–192.
doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00180.x
Cunningham, Mick and Arland Thornton (2005) “The influence of union transitions on white adults’ attitudes toward cohabitation”. Journal of Marriage and Family 67, 710–720.
doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00164.x
Fishbein, Martin and Icek Ajzen (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fisher, Wesley A. (1980) The Soviet marriage market: mate-selection in Russia and the USSR. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Hantrais, Linda (2004) EU research on social sciences and humanities: improving policy responses and outcomes to socio-economic challenges: changing family structures, policy and practice (IPROSEC). Final Report. European Comission.
Huston, Ted L. and Heidi Melz (2004) “The case for (promoting) marriage: the devil is in the details”. Journal of Marriage and Family 66, 943–958.
doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00064.x
Järviste, Liina, Kairi Kasesaru, and Andra Reinomägi (2008) Abielu ja vaba kooselu: trendid, regulatsioonid, hoiakud. [Marriage and unmarried cohabitation: trends, regulations and attitudesTranslation into English.] (Sotsiaalministeeriumi toimetised, 4.) Tallinn.
Kiernan, Kathleen (2000) “European perspectives on union formation”. In Ties that bind: perspectives on marriage and cohabitation, 40–59. Linda J. Waite, ed. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kiernan, Kathleen (2002) “Cohabitation in Western Europe: trends, issues, and implications”. In Just living together: implications of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy, 3–31. Alan Booth and Ann C. Crouter. eds.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Liefbroer, Aart C and Jenny de Jong Gierveld (1993) “The impact of rational considerations and perceived opinions on young adults union formation intentions”. Journal of Family Issues 14, 2, 213–235.
Manning, Wendy. D. and Pamela J. Smock (1995) “Why marry? Race and the transition to marriage among cohabitors”. Demography 32, 4, 509–520.
doi:10.2307/2061671
Manning, Wendy D. and Pamela J. Smock, (2002) “First comes cohabitation and then comes marriage?” Journal of Family Issues 23, 1065–1087.
doi:10.1177/019251302237303
Moors, Guy and Eva Bernhardt (2009) “Splitting up or getting married? Competing risk analysis of transitions among cohabiting couples in Sweden”. Acta Sociologica 52, 3, 227–247.
doi:10.1177/0001699309339800
Nock, Steven L. (1995) “A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships”. Journal of Family Issues 16, 53–76.
doi:10.1177/019251395016001004
Paetsch, Joanne J., Nicholas M. Bala, Lorne D. Bertrand, and Lisa Glennon (2004) “Trends in the formation and dissolution of couples”. In The Blackwell companion to the sociology of families, 306–321. Jacqueline Scott, Judith Treas, Martin Richards eds. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Oppenheimer, Valerie K. (1997) “Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: the specialization and trading model”. Annual Review of Sociology 23, 431–453.
doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.431
Perelli-Harris, Brienna, Wendy Sigle-Rushton, Trude Lappegard, Aiva Jasilioniene, Paola Di Giulio, Renske Keizer, Katja Koeppen, Caroline Berghammer, and Michaela Kreyenfeld (2009) Examining nonmarital childbearing in Europe: how does union context differ across countries? MPIDR Working Paper WP 2009-021.
Reed, Joanna M. (2006) “Not crossing the “extra line”: how cohabitors with children view their union”. Journal of Marriage and Family 68, 1117–1131.
doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00318.x
Rindfuss, Roland R. and Audrey Van den Heuvel (1990) “Cohabitation: a precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single?”. Population and Development Review 16, 4, 703–726.
doi:10.2307/1972963
Rivis, Amanda and Pashcal Sheeran (2003) “Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analysis”. Current Psychology 22, 3, 218–233.
doi:10.1007/s12144-003-1018-2
Sample, John and Rex Warland (1973) “Attitude and prediction of behavior”. Social Forces 51, 3, 292–304.
doi:10.2307/2577135
Sassler, Sharon (2004) “The process of entering into cohabiting unions”. Journal of Marriage and Family 66, 491–505.
doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00033.x
Sassler, Sharon and Robert Schoen (1999) “The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage”. Journal of Marriage and Family 61, 147–159.
doi:10.2307/353890
Seltzer, Judith A. (2000) “Families formed outside of marriage”. Journal of Marriage and Family 62, 1247–1268.
doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01247.x
Skinner, Kevin B., Stephen J. Bahr, D. Russell Crane, and Vaughn R. A. Call (2002) “Cohabitation, marriage and remarriage. a comparison of relationship quality over time”. Journal of Family Issues 23, 74–90.
doi:10.1177/0192513X02023001004
Smock, Pamela J. (2000) “Cohabitation in the United States: an appraisal of research, themes, findings and implications”. Annual Review of Sociology 26, 1–20.
doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.1
Smock, Pamela J. and Wendy D. Manning (1997) “Cohabiting partnerseconomic circumstances and marriage”. Demography 34, 3, 331–341.
doi:10.2307/3038287
Smock, Pamela J. and Sanjiv Gupta (2002) “Cohabitation in contemporary North America”. In Just living together: implications of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy, 53–84, Alan Booth and Ann C. Crouter, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Smock, Pamela J., Wendy D. Manning, and Meredith Porter (2005) “‘Everything’s there except money’: how money shapes decision to marry among cohabiters”. Journal of Marriage and Family 67, 680–696.
doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00162.x
Sobotka, Tomáš and Laurent Toulemon (2008) “Changing family and partnership behaviour: common trends and persistent diversity across Europe”. Demographic Research 19, 85–138.
doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.6
Starrels, Marjorie E. and Kristen E. Holms (2000) “Adolescents plans for family formation: is parental socialization important?”. Journal of Marriage and Family 62, 416–429.
doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00416.x
Thornton, Arland (1991) “Influence of the marital history of parents on the marital and cohabitational experience of children”. American Journal of Sociology 96, 4, 868–894.
doi:10.1086/229611
Thornton, Arland, William G. Axinn, and Jay D. Teachman (1995) “The influence of school enrolment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood”. American Sociological Review 60, 762–774.
doi:10.2307/2096321
Thornton, Arland and Linda Young-DeMacro (2001) “Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: the 1960s through the 1990s”. Journal of Marriage and Family 63, 1009–1037.
doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01009.x
Waller, Maureen R and Sara S. McLanahan (2005) “‘his’ and ‘her’ marriage expectations: determinants and consequences”. Journal of Marriage and Family 67, 53–67.
Wu, Zheng and Michael S. Pollard (2000) “Economic circumstances and the stability of nonmarital cohabitation”. Journal of Family Issues 21, 303–328.doi:10.1177/019251300021003002
