, Jaanika Puusalu The increasing reliance on digital technologies, including the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), has equipped autocratic regimes with more powerful tools than ever to manipulate information and extend societal control both domestically and internationally. Likewise, the European Union (EU), its Member States, and partners have faced a rise in hybrid campaigns, including hostile information manipulation aimed at them. The ability to conduct large-scale disinformation campaigns to destabilize democratic nations, foster polarization, spread radical propaganda, provoke crises, and interfere in elections has underscored the need for effective countermeasures to protect democratic societies from malicious interference in the information environment. Simultaneously, there is an ongoing debate among democratic countries about whether and to what extent certain restrictions on freedom of speech are justified on public safety grounds. Based on comparative document analysis, this paper examines the challenge posed by digitally enabled security threats to democratic societies. It identifies four normative pillars to safeguard the EU’s information environment, using the EU as a specific case study. From this perspective, the article contributes to understanding a novel, fast-changing aspect of the EU’s security agenda through the normative power of its internal market regulations.
AI HLEG (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission: Brussels. Available online at
https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=60419. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
Artificial Intelligence Act (2024) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act) (Text with EEA relevance). OJ L, 2024/1689, 12.7.2024.
Bayer, Judit (2024) “The EU policy on disinformation: aims and legal basis”. Journal of Media Law, 16, 1, 18–27.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2024.2362478
Brattberg, Erik and Tim Maurer (2018) “Russian election interference: Europe’s counter to fake news and cyber attacks” (May 2018). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available online at
https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2018/05/russian-election-interference-europes-counter-to-fake-news-and-cyber-attacks. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2012) Official Journal of the European Union 2012/C 326/391.
Council Decision (2014a) Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine. OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, 26–30.
Council Decision (2014b) Council Decision 2014/145/CFSP of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty, and independence of Ukraine. OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, 16–21.
Council Decision (2014c) Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine. OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, 13–17.
Council Decision (2024) Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 of 8 October 2024 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s destabilising activities. OJ L, 2024/2643, 9.10.2024.
Council Regulation (2014a) Council Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine. OJ L 66, 6.3.2014, 1–10.
Council Regulation (2014b) Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine. OJ L 78, 17.3.2014, 6–15.
Council Regulation (2014c) Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine. OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, 1–11.
Digital Markets Act (2022) Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act). OJ L 265, 12.10.2022.
Digital Services Act (2022) Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC. OJ L 277, 27.10.2022.
Dorosh, Lesia, Teresa Astramowicz-Leyk, and Yaryna Turchyn (2021) “The impact of post-truth politics as a hybrid information influence on the status of international and national security: the attributes of interpretation and the search for counteraction mechanisms”. European Politics and Society, 23, 3, 340–363.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1873041
Duffy, Kat and Katie Harbath (2024) “Defending the Year of Democracy: what it will take to defend 2024’s 80-plus elections from hostile actors”. Foreign Affairs (4 January 2024). Available online at
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/defending-year-democracy. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
Easterly, Jen, Scott Schwab, and Cait Conley (2024) “Artificial intelligence’s threat to democracy: how to safeguard U.S. elections from AI-Powered misinformation and cyberattacks”. Foreign Affairs (3 January 2024). Available online at
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/artificial-intelligences-threat-democracy. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
EU Restrictive Measures (2025) EU restrictive measures against Russia over Ukraine (since 2014). Official website of the Council of the EU and the European Council. Available online at
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions-against-russia/#media. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
European Commission (2016) Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council. Joint Framework on countering hybrid threats a European Union response. JOIN/2016/018 final.
European Commission (2020) White paper on artificial intelligence – a European approach to excellence and trust. Brussels, 19.2.2020. COM(2020) 65 final. Available online at
https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2020-02/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
European Commission (2023) Seventh Progress Report on the implementation of the 2016 Joint Framework on countering hybrid threats and the 2018 Joint Communication on increasing resilience and bolstering capabilities to address hybrid threats. Brussels, 14.9.2023. SWD (2023) 315 final.
European Commission (2024) Eighth progress report on the implementation of the 2016 Joint framework on countering hybrid threats and the 2018 Joint communication on increasing resilience and bolstering capabilities to address hybrid threats. Brussels, 17.10.2024. SWD(2024) 233 final.
European Commission (2025a) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on ProtectEU: a European Internal Security Strategy. Strasbourg, 1.4.2025. COM(2025) 148 final.
European Commission (2025b) Supervision of the designated very large online platforms and search engines under DSA. Available online at
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/list-designated-vlops-and-vloses. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
European External Action Service (2022) “A Strategic Compass for Security and Defence for a European Union that protects its citizens, values, and interests and contributes to international peace and security”. Available online at
https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/strategic-compass-security-and-defence-1_en. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
European External Action Service (2023) “1st EEAS Report on Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference Threats: A Framework for Networked Defence”. Available online at
https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/1st-eeas-report-foreign-information-manipulation-and-interference-threats_en. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
European External Action Service (2024) “2nd EEAS Report on Foreign Information Manipulation
and Interference Threats: A Framework for Networked Defence”. Available online at https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/2nd-eeas-report-foreign-information-manipulation-and-interference-threats_en. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
European External Action Service (2025) “3rd EEAS Report on Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference Threats: A Framework for Networked Defence”. Available online at
https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/3rd-eeas-report-foreign-information-manipulation-and-interference-threats-0_en. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
European Media Freedom Act (2024) Regulation (EU) 2024/1083 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a common framework for media services in the internal market and amending Directive 2010/13/EU (European Media Freedom Act). OJ L, 2024/1083, 17.4.2024.
Europol (2023) “European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report TE–SAT”. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Available online at
https://www.europol.europa.eu/publication-events/main-reports/european-union-terrorism-situation-and-trend-report-2023-te-sat. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
Europol (2025) “European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report TE–SAT”. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Available online at
https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-events/main-reports/tesat-report. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
General Data Protection Regulation (2016) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons about the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance). OJ L 119, 4.5.2016.
Guiora, Amos and Elizabeth A. Park (2017) “Hate speech on social media”. Philosophia,45, 957–971.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-017-9858-4
Haeck, Pieter (2025) “US presses Brussels for answers over EU social media law”. Politico (31 January 2025). Available online at
https://www.politico.eu/article/jim-jordan-presses-european-commission-for-answers-over-eu-social-media-law-henna-virkkunen-digital-services-act/. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
Hunter, Lance Y. (2024) “Regime characteristics and online government disinformation”. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2024.2445730
Husovec, Martin (2024) “The Digital Services Act’s red line: what the Commission can and cannot do about disinformation”. Journal of Media Law, 16, 1, 47–56.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2024.2362483
Jokinen, Janne, Magnus Normark, and Michael Fredholm (2022) “Hybrid threats from non-state actors: A taxonomy”. Hybrid CoE Research Report No. 6 (June 2022). Available online at
https://www.hybridcoe.fi/publications/hybrid-coe-research-report-6-hybrid-threats-from-non-state-actors-a-taxonomy/. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
Jungherr, Andreas (2024) “Foundational questions for the regulation of digital disinformation”. Journal of Media Law, 16, 1, 8–17.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2024.2362484
Jungwirth, Rainer, Hanna Smith, Etienne Willkomm, Jukka Savolainen, Marina Alonso Villota, Maxime Lebrun, Aleksi Aho, and Georgios Giannopoulos (2023) “Hybrid Threats: A Compre-hensive Resilience Ecosystem”. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online at
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC129019. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
Katagiri, Nori (2025) “The rise of offensive cyber and the reality of European digital policy”. European Politics and Society, 1–18.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2025.2483813
Kaunert, Christian, Joana de Deus Pereira, and Mike Edwards (2020) “Thick Europe, ontological security and parochial Europe: the re-emergence of far-right extremism and terrorism after the refugee crisis of 2015”. European Politics and Society, 23, 1, 42–61.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1842699
Kokalari, Amy and Timothy Yu-Cheong Yeung (2024) “Selective reception of external strategic narratives: vaccine diplomacy in the Western Balkans during the COVID-19 pandemic”. European Politics and Society, 26, 4, 899–917.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2024.2421909
Kondratov, Eugene and Elisabeth Johansson-Nogués (2022) “Russia’s hybrid interference campaigns in France, Germany, and the UK: a challenge against trust in liberal democracies?” Geopolitics, 28, 5, 2169–2199.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2129012
Laurinavičius, Marius (2018) “A guide to the Russian toolbox of election meddling: a platform to analyse the long-term comprehensive Kremlin strategy of malign influence”. International Elections Study Center. Available online at
http://iesc.lt/app/uploads/2018/10/IESC_Guide_ToolBox_2018_FINAL.pdf. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
Loik, Ramon and Victor Madeira (2021) “European Union strategy and capabilities to counter hostile influence operations”. In Holger Mölder, Vladimir Sazonov, Archil Chochia and Tanel Kerikmäe, eds. The Russian Federation in global knowledge warfare. Influence operations in Europe and its neighbourhood, 247−264. (Contributions to International Relations CIR). Switzerland: Springer Nature
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73955-3_13
Mazzucchi, Nicolas (2022) “AI-based technologies in hybrid conflict: the future of influence operations”. Hybrid CoE Paper 14 (23 June 2022). Available online at
https://www.hybridcoe.fi/publications/hybrid-coe-paper-14-ai-based-technologies-in-hybrid-conflict-the-future-of-influence-operations/. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
McKay, Spencer and Chris Tenove (2020) “Disinformation as a threat to deliberative democracy”. Political Research Quarterly, 74, 3, 703–717.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920938143
Miller, Michael L. and Cristian Vaccari (2020) “Digital threats to democracy: comparative lessons and possible remedies”. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25, 3, 333–356.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220922323
Nieuwenhuis, Aernout (2000) “Freedom of speech: USA vs Germany and Europe”. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 18, 2, 195–214.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/092405190001800203
https://doi.org/10.1177/092405190001800203
Office of Foreign Assets Control (2024) “Evrazia”. Sanctions List Search. Office of Foreign Assets Control. Available online at
https://sanctionssearch.ofac.treas.gov/Details.aspx?id=50693. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
Oxenstierna, Susanne and Per Olsson (2015). “The economic sanctions against Russia: impact and prospect of success”. Sanctions Research Platform. Available online at
https://sanctionsplat-form.ohchr.org/record/21058?ln=en. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
Palmertz, Björn (2021) “Influence operations and the modern information environment”. In M. Weissmann, N. Nilsson, B. Palmertz, and P. Thunholm, eds. Hybrid warfare: security and asymmetric conflict in international relations. (Bloomsbury Collections.) London: I. B. Tauris.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781788317795.0014
Peukert, Alexander (2024) “The regulation of disinformation: a critical appraisal”. Journal of Media Law, 16, 1, 1–7.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2024.2362485
Segado-Boj, Francisco and Jesús Díaz-Campo (2020) “Social media and its intersections with free speech, freedom of information, and privacy. An analysis”. Journal ICONO 14, 18, 1, 231–255.
https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v18i1.1379
Schirch, Lisa, ed. (2021) Social media impacts on conflict and democracy: the techtonic shift. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087649
Terrorist Content Online Regulation (2021) Regulation (EU) 2021/784 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2021 on addressing the dissemination of terrorist content online (Text with EEA relevance). OJ L 172, 17.5.2021, 79–109.
Urman, Aleksandra and Mykola Makhortykh (2024) “Trolls, bots, and everyone else: the analysis of multilingual social media manipulation campaigns on Twitter during the 2019 elections in Ukraine”. East European Politics, 41, 1, 97–116.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2024.2415640
U.S. Department of the Treasury (2022) “Treasury sanctions elites and companies in economic sectors that generate substantial revenue for the Russian regime”. Press release (2 August 2022). Available online at
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0905. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
U.S. Department of the Treasury (2024) Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations 31 CFR part 587 GENERAL LICENSE NO. 25G (30.10.2024). Available online at
https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/933536/download?inline. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
Von Essen, Louisa and Marinus Ossewaarde (2023) “Artificial intelligence and European identity: the European Commission’s struggle for reconciliation”. European Politics and Society, 25, 2, 375–402.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2023.2244385
Wardle, Claire and Hossein Derakshan (2017) “Information disorder: toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making”. Council of Europe report DGI(2017)09. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available online at
https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
WHO (2021) “Infodemic”. World Health Organization. Available online at
https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
Zygar, Michail (2024) “Russia’s war on woke: Putin is trying to unite the Far Right and undermine the West”. Foreign Affairs (2 January 2024). Available online at
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/russian-federation/russias-war-woke. Accessed on 25.03.2026.
