The integration of advanced extended reality technologies in the manufacturing and industrial context through the evolution of Industry 4.0 to the more user-centric Industry 5.0 paradigm guides the transformation of how end users access and control cyber-physical systems and real-time data sources. This is applicable both in real-world manufacturing contexts and higher education institutions, where future engineers learn how to design and manage these production systems. Extended reality (XR) has become an integral part of several aspects of industrial human-machine interaction methods, including diagnostic data visualization, teleoperation, augmented servicing and assembly instruction procedures, and safe operation of heavier machinery. In the educational context, XR allows for hands-on virtual activities, repeatability, and extended accessibility of limited resources before laboratory practical tasks. Since the pandemic, the digitalization of practical educational activities has been a central focus of pedagogical practices, leading to the development of specific engineering workflows. These integrate software and hardware solutions aimed at the implementation of XR experiences that fulfil the intended learning outcomes of the engineering product, process, and system design. In this paper, we present the design of an educational workflow for integrating manufacturing systems in XR-based learning environments. Two use cases are presented to demonstrate the relevance of the proposed workflow. The first provides an interactive experience that transfers laboratory teaching practices for pneumatics systems into an augmented reality (AR) application. The second focuses on the visualization and learning of direct kinematics methods for an industrial robotic arm.
1. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W. and Helbig, J. Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 working group. Forschungsunion, Berlin, Germany, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.3390/sci4030026
2. Pizzagalli, S. L. Extended reality for I5.0: towards human centricity in human-robot interaction. PhD thesis. Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia, 2024.
3. Damiani, L., Demartini, M., Guizzi, G., Revetria, R. and Tonelli, F. Augmented and virtual reality applications in industrial systems: a qualitative review towards the Industry 4.0 era. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, 51(11), 624–630.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.388
4. Terkaj, W., Kleine, K. and Kuts, V. Virtual labs for higher education in industrial engineering. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci., 2024, 73(2), 142–149.
https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2024.2.07
5. ECORYS. XR and its potential for Europe. Brussels, 2021.
https://xreuropepotential.com/assets/pdf/ecorys-xr-2021-report.pdf (accessed 2025-01-13).
6. Soliman, M., Pesyridis, A., Dalaymani-Zad, D., Gronfula, M. and Kourmpetis, M. The application of virtual reality in engineering education. Appl. Sci., 2021, 11(6), 2879.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062879
7. Takrouri, K., Causton, E. and Simpson, B. AR technologies in engineering education: applications, potential, and limitations. Digital, 2022, 2(2), 171–190.
https://doi.org/10.3390/digital2020011
8. Christiansen, L., Hvidsten, T. E., Kristensen, J. H., Gebhardt, J., Mahmood, K., Otto, T. et al. A framework for developing educational Industry 4.0 activities and study materials. Educ. Sci., 2022, 12(10), 659.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100659
9. Büth, L., Juraschek, M., Sangwan, K. S., Herrmann, C. and Thiede, S. Integrating virtual and physical production processes in learning factories. Procedia Manuf., 2020, 45, 121–127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.082
10. Mahmood, K., Otto, T., Kuts, V., Terkaj, W., Modoni, G., Urgo, M. et al. Advancement in production engineering education through Virtual Learning Factory Toolkit concept. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci., 2021, 70(4), 374–382.
https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2021.4.02
11. Terkaj, W., Urgo, M., Kovács, P., Tóth, E. and Mondellini, M. A framework for virtual learning in industrial engineering education: development of a reconfigurable virtual learning factory application. Virtual Real., 2024, 28(3), 148.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-024-01042-8
12. Next.js. https://nextjs.org (accessed 2025-01-11).
13. Three.js. https://threejs.org (accessed 2025-01-11).
14. WebXR. https://immersiveweb.dev (accessed 2025-01-11).
15. Yaskawa.
https://www.motoman.com/en-us/products/robots/indus trial/assembly-handling/gp-series/gp8 (accessed 2025-01-13).
16. ABB.
https://new.abb.com/products/it/3HAC021770-001/irb-1600 (accessed 2025-01-13).
17. Spong, M. W., Hutchinson, S. and Vidyasagar, M. Robot Modeling and Control. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
18. ROS. https://wiki.ros.org/urdf (accessed 2025-01-13).
19. Unity. https://unity.com (accessed 2025-01-13).
20. Kuts, V., Otto, T., Tähemaa, T. and Bondarenko, Y. Digital twin based synchronised control and simulation of the industrial robotic cell using virtual reality. J. Mach. Eng., 2019, 19(1), 128–145.
https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.0464
