Primary care is the basic level of care, where patients start their treatment journey. Proactive management at primary care level improves health access and quality of care through proactive approach for specific patient sub-groups, improves integration of care at different levels of the health care system, and improves patient outcomes. The aim of the study was to describe family nurses’ perceptions of high-risk patients’ proactive management and identify further training needs; therefore, a descriptive and empirical two-stage study design was used. A convenience sample of 16 family nurses was recruited in the first stage. The study was conducted at five Estonian primary health centers. Data were collected by Modified Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (MPACIC) online questionnaire between September and December 2020. Ethical approval was obtained. The nurses evaluated their proactive management of high-risk patients positively. Higher results were related to patient support, encouragement, involvement in everyday care, and individual goal setting questions. Lower results were related to referral to professionals, follow-up visits, and suggesting specific health related programs and events from which the patients could benefit. As a second stage of the study, a training program was developed based on the acquired results and training was conducted for 18 nurses at one primary health center, where care management has been used since 2017. The training program was found to be useful. Nurses need specific knowledge about the proactive management and care plan of high-risk patients, which can be ensured through systematic training. The subject of nurses’ perceptions could benefit from further study by qualitative methods.
1. Davy, C., Bleasel, J., Liu, H., Tchan, M., Ponniah, S. and Brown, A. Effectiveness of chronic care models: opportunities for improving healthcare practice and health outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res., 2015, 15, 194.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0854-8
2. WHO. Noncommunicable Diseases Progress Monitor 2022.
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240047761 (accessed 2022-12-17).
3. King, D. E., Xiang, J. and Pilkerton, C. S. Multimorbidity trends in United States adults, 1988–2014. J. Am. Board Fam. Medicine, 2018, 31(4), 503–513.
https://doi.org./10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.180008
4. Breckner, A., Glassen, K., Schulze, J., Lühmann, D., Schaefer, I., Szecsenyi, J., Scherer, M. and Wensing, M. Experiences of patients with multimorbidity with primary care and the association with patient activation: a cross-sectional study in Germany. BMJ Open., 2022, 12(8), 059100.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059100
5. Karam, M., Chouinard, M.-C., Poitras, M.-E., Couturier, Y., Vedel, I., Grgurevic, N. and Hudon, C. Nursing care coordination for patients with complex needs in primary healthcare: a scoping review. Int. J. Integr. Care, 2021, 21(1).
http://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5518
6. Poon, B. Y., Shortell, S. M. and Rodriguez, H. P. Patient activation as a pathway to shared decision-making for adults with diabetes or cardiovascular disease. J. Gen. Intern. Med., 2020, 35(3), 732–742.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05351-6
7. Graffigna, G., Barello, S., Bonanomi, A., Lozza, E. and Hibbard, J. Measuring patient activation in Italy: translation, adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the patient activation measure 13 (PAM 13-l). BMC Medical Inform. Decis. Mak., 2015, 15, 109.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0232-9
8. Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., Davis, C., Hindmarsh, M., Schaefer, J. and Bonomi, A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff., 2001, 20(6), 64–78.
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64
9. Carryer, J., Budge, C., Hansen, C., and Gibbs, K. Modifying the PACIC to assess provision of chronic illness care: An exploratory study with primary health care nurses. J. Prim. Health Care, 2010, 2(2), 118–123.
https://doi.org/10.1071/HC10118
10. Valaitis, R. K., Carter, N., Lam, A., Nicholl, J., Feather, J., and Cleghorn, L. Implementation and maintenance of patient navigation programs linking primary care with community-based health and social services: a scoping literature review. BMC Health Serv. Res., 2017, 17(1), 116.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2046-1
11. Pestka, D. L., Paterson, N. L., Benedict, K. A., Williams, D. D., Shellenbarger, B. A., McVay-Steer, A. J. et al. Delivering care to high-cost high-need patients: lessons learned in the development of a complex care primary care team. J. Prim. Care Community Health., 2018, 12, 21501327211023888.
https://doi.org/10.1177/21501327211023888
12. Smeets, R. G. M., Kroese, M. E. A. L., Ruwaard, D., Hameleers, N. and Elissen, A. M. J. Person-centred and efficient care delivery for high-need, high-cost patients: primary care professionals’ experiences. BMC Fam. Pract., 2020, 21, 106.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01172-3
13. Kilpatrick, I. K., Paquette, L., Jabbour, M., Tchouaket, E., Fernandez, N., Al Hakim, G. et al. Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams. PLoS One, 2020, 15(6), 0234416.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234416
14. Romero-Rodríguez E., Torres, L. A. P., Moral, R. R., Fernández García, J. A., Parras Rejano, J. M. and Villalobos, A. R. Training health providers to address unhealthy alcohol use in primary care: a cross-sectional, multicenter study. Francisco Camarelles Guillem and Collaborative Group Alco-AP. BMC Health Serv. Res., 2020, 20(1), 877.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05730-4
15. Fabbri, E., Zoli, M., Gonzalez-Freire, M., Salive, M. E., Studenski, S. A. and Ferrucci, L. Aging and multimorbidity: new tasks, priorities, and frontiers for integrated gerontological and clinical research. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc., 2016, 16(8), 640–647.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.03.013
16. O’Connor, S., Deaton, C. and Nolan, F. Nursing in an age of multimorbidity. BMC Nurs., 2018, 17, 49.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-018-0321-z
17. Kilbourne, M. L., Denise Hynes, D., O’Toole, T., and Atkins, D. A research agenda for care coordination for chronic conditions: aligning implementation, technology, and policy strategies. Transl. Behav. Med., 2018, 8(3), 515–521.
https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibx084
18. Rijken, M. and Heide, I. Identifying subgroups of persons with multimorbidity based on their needs for care and support. BMC Fam. Pract., 2019, 20, 179.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1069-6
19. Da Costa Linch, G. F., Lima, A. A. A., de Souza, E. N., Nauderer, T. M., Paz, A. A. and da Costa, C. An educational intervention impact on the quality of nursing records. Rev. Lat. Am. Enfermagem., 2017, 25, 2938.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1986.2938
20. Machado, J. P., Veiga, E. V., Ferreira, P. A. C., Martins, J. C. A. M., Atila, E., Fernanda R. E. and Gimenes, F. R. E. Assessment of an educational intervention to improve nurses’ knowledge of blood pressure measurement. J. Nurs. Educ. Pract., 2018, 8(2), 56–62.
https://doi.org.10.5430/jnep.v8n2p56
21. Sanchez, K., Killian, M. O., Eghaneya, B. H., Cabassa L. J. and Trivedi, M. H. Culturally adapted depression education and engagement in treatment among Hispanics in primary care: outcomes from a pilot feasibility study. BMC Fam. Pract., 2019, 20(1), 140.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-019-1031-7
22. Seibert, S. A. Problem-based learning: A strategy to foster generation Z’s critical thinking and perseverance. Teach. Learn. Nurs., 2021, 16(1), 85–88.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.09.002
23. Thabet, M., Taha, E. L., Abood S. A. and Morsy. E. The effect of problem-based learning on nursing students’ decision-makings kills and styles. J. Nurs. Educ. Pract., 2017, 7(6), 108–116.
https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v7n6p108
