ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1965
 
Linguistica Uralica cover
Linguistica Uralica
ISSN 1736-7506 (Electronic)
ISSN 0868-4731 (Print)
Research article
On Dative-Lative Encoded Direct Objects in West Mansi; pp. 307–338
PDF | https://doi.org/10.3176/lu.2023.4.06

Author
Gerson Klumpp
Abstract

Among the varieties of Ob-Ugric, West Mansi stands out in showing a differential object marking pattern in which direct objects may be encoded with a multi-functional dative-lative case. The present study builds on the West Mansi texts in the Ob-Babel corpus, where approximately one third of all referential and given objects is marked. As has been observed for other object marking varieties of Mansi too, the majority of marked objects agree with the verb. Object agreement signals topicality, but in focal contexts given objects also do not agree. A single parameter responsible for object marking could not be identified, and the results point to a bundle of parameters falling under the notions of prominence and activation. Grammaticalization of the dative-lative case as a marker of direct objects may result from topicalization, recipient promotion, and agent marking. The study contributes to the knowledge about DOM in Mansi, and adds West Mansi to the body of literature on accusative-dative syncretic DOM.

References

Aissen,  Judith  2003,  Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. — ­Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21, 435—483.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024109008573

Bakró-Nagy,  Marianne,  Sipőcz,  Katalin,  Skribnik,  Elena  2022,  North Mansi. — Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso, Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 537—564.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0029

Bíró, Bernadett,  Sipőcz,  Katalin  2018,  Ditranstitive Constructions in Mansi Dialects. — Agnes Korn, Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Ditransitive Constructions in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Wies­baden: Reichert, 187—207.

Chafe,  Wallace  1987,  Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow. — Russel S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse (Typological Studies in Language 11), Amsterdam—Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 21—51.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.11.03cha

Collinder,  Björn  1958,  Der Akkusativ im Wogulischen. — NyK 60, 17—21.

Csepregi,  Márta  2023,  Khanty. — Daniel Abondolo, Riitta-Liisa Valijärvi (eds.), The Uralic Languages. Second edition, London—New York: Routledge, 703—752.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625096-16

Dalrymple,  Mary,  Nikolaeva  Irina  2005,  Nonsubject Agreement and Discourse Roles. — Anna McNay (ed.), Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, ­Philology and Phonetics 10, 71—91.

Forsberg,  Ulla-Maija  2022,  East Mansi. — Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laak­so, Elena Skribnik (eds), The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 565—581.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0030

Fraurud,  Kari  1990,  Definiteness and the Processing of Noun Phrases in ­Natural Discourse. — Journal of Semantics 7, 395—433.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/7.4.395

Grüning,  André,  Kibrik,  Andrej  A.  2002,  Modelling Referential Choice in Discourse: A Cognitive Calculative Approach and a Neural Network Approach. — António Branco, Tony McEnery, Ruslan Mitkov (eds.), Anaphora ­Processing. Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Modelling, Amsterdam— Philadelphia: John Benjamins (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 263), 163—198.
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.263.11gru

Hawkins,  John  1978,  Definiteness and Indefiniteness. A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction, London: Croom Helm.

Honti  László  1969,  A tárgy jelölése a vogul nyelv tavdai nyelvjárásában. — NyK 71, 113—120.

Honti,  László  1988,  Die wogulische Sprache. — Denis Sinor (ed.), The Uralic Languages, Leiden: Brill (Handbuch der Orientalistik 8/1), 147—171.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004492493_011

Honti  László  2022,  Az ősi uráli tárgyragok története és vesszőfutása. Accusatum et expulsum, Budapest: Tinta (Segédkönyvek a nyelvészet tanulmányozásához 226).

Iemmolo,  Giorgio  2011,  Towards a Typological Study of Differential Object Marking and Differential Object Indexation, Pavia: University of Pavia doctoral dissertation.

Iemmolo,  Giorgio  2013,  On the Polysemy of Object Markers and Topic Markers: A Study in Diachronic Typology. Ms., University of Zurich.

Kálmán,  Béla  1989  (1975),  Chrestomathia Vogulica, Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.

Keresztes,  László  1998,  Mansi. — Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic Languages, London—New York: Routledge, 387—427.

Klumpp,  Gerson  2014,  Identifiability, Givenness and Zero-Marked ­Referential Objects in Komi. — Linguistics 52: 2, 415—444.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0068

Klumpp,  Gerson,  Skribnik,  Elena  2022,  Information Structuring. — Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso, Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1018—1036.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0054

Kulonen,  Ulla-Maija  1999,  Object Marking in the Ugric Languages. — Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Zoltán Molnár, Zsuzsanna Salánki, Mária Sipos (eds.), Budapesti Uráli Műhely 1. Ugor Műhely, Budapest: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet, 63—71.

Kuno,  Susumu  1987,  Functional Syntax. Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lambrecht,  Knud  1994,  Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71).
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607

Lavotha  Ödön  1953,  A tárgy jelölése a manysiban. — NyK 54, 200—218.

Liimola,  Matti  1954,  Zur wogulischen Etymologie und Formenlehre. — JSFOu 57: 1, 1—47.

Marcantonio,  Angela  1993,  Double Conjugation vs. Double Marking for the Object in Some Dialects of Vogul. — Études Finno-Ougriennes 25, 19—42.

Munkácsi  Bernát  1892—1896,  Vogul népköltési gyűjtemény I—IV, Budapest: Reguly Társaság.

Munkácsi  Bernát  1894,  A vogul nyelvjárások szóragozása, Budapest: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia (Ugor Füzetek 11).

Munkácsi,  Bernát,  Kálmán,  Béla  1986,  Wogulisches Wörterbuch, ­Budapest: Akadémia Kiadó.

Næss,  Åshild  2008,  Varieties of Dative. — Andrej Malchukov, Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 572—580.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0039

Nikolaeva,  Irina  1999,  Object Agreement, Grammatical Relations, and Information Structure. — Studies in Language 23, 331—376.
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23.2.05nik

Nikolaeva,  Irina  2001a,  Secondary Topic as a Relation in Information Structure. — Linguistics 39, 1—49.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.006

Nikolaeva,  Irina,  Kovgan,  Elena,  Koškareva,  Natalia  1993,  Communicative Roles in Ostyak Syntax. — FUF 51, 125—167.
https://doi.org/10.33339/fuf.114379

Perrot,  Jean  1994,  Éléments pour une typologie des structures informatives. — Mémoires de la Société de linguistique de Paris, nouvelle série II, 13—26.

Prince,  Ellen  F.  1981,  Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Information. — Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, 223—256. 

Riese,  Timothy  1992,  Zur Entwicklung des Kasussystems im Wogulischen. — Pál Deréky (ed.), Festschrift für Károly Rédei zum 60. Geburtstag. Emlék­könyv Rédei Károly 60. születésnapjára, Wien—Budapest (Studia Uralica 6), 379—388.

Rombandeeva,  Evdokija  1984,  Wogulische Syntax. Aus dem Russischen übertragen von Katharina Oestreich-Geib, München: Universität München.

Schön,  Zsófia,  Gugán,  Katalin  2022,  East Khanty. — Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso, Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 608—635.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0032

Sherwood,  Peter  1996,  Megjegyzések a tavdai vogul végnapjairól. — CIFU VIII. Pars IV, 244—248.

Sipőcz,  Katalin  2015,  Ditransitivity in the Ob-Ugric Languages. — CIFU XII, 133—157.

Sipos,  Mária  2022,  North Khanty. — Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso, Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 582—607.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0031

Skribnik,  Elena  2001,  Pragmatic structuring in Northern Mansi. — CIFU IX. Pars VI, 222—239.

Skribnik,  Elena,  Laakso,  Johanna  2022,  Ugric. General Introduction. — Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso, Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 523—536.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0028

Sosa,  Sachiko  2017,  Functions of Morphosyntactic Alternations, and Information Flow in Surgut Khanty Discourse, Helsinki: University of Helsinki doctoral dissertation.

Szilágyi,  Norbert  2014,  A tavdai manysi tárgyjelölés morfoszintaktikai alapú vizsgálata digitalizált korpusz alapján. MA/MSc, Szegedi Tudományegye­tem.

Virtanen,  Susanna  2013a,  Informaatiorakenteen vaikutus suoran objektin mer­kintään mansin itämurteissa. — JSFOu 94, 293—335.
https://doi.org/10.33340/susa.82601

Virtanen,  Susanna  2013b,  Contextual Function of Noun Marking in the Direct Object Marking System of Eastern Mansi. — Új szempontok az uráli nyelvek kutatásában III, Budapest: ELTE, Finnugor Tanszék (Uralisticai tanulmányok 20), 305—317.

Virtanen,  Susanna  2014,  Pragmatic Direct Object Marking in Eastern Mansi. — Linguistics 52: 2, 391—413.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0067

Virtanen,  Susanna  2015,  Transitivity in Eastern Mansi. An Information Structural Approach. Academic dissertation, Faculty of Arts at University of Helsinki, Espoo
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/152802

Virtanen,  Susanna  2021,  A Template Approach to Pragmatic Constituent Order Variation in Modern Northern Mansi. — FUF 66, 188—234.

Virtanen,  Susanna,  Horváth,  Csilla  2023,  Mansi. — Daniel Abondolo, Riitta-Liisa Valijärvi (eds.), The Uralic Languages. Second edition, London—New York: Routledge, 665—702.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625096-15

Wickman,  Bo  1955,  The Form of the Object in the Uralic Languages, Uppsala—Wiesbaden (UUÅ 6).

Witzlack-Makarevich,  Alena,  Seržant,  Ilja  A.  2018,  Differential Argument Marking: Patterns of Variation. — Ilja A. Seržant, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Diachrony of Differential Argument Marking, Berlin: Language Science Press, 1—40.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1228243

Wogulische Volksdichtung I—VI. Gesammelt und übersetzt von Artturi Kannisto. Bearbeitet und herausgegeben von Matti Liimola, Helsinki 1951—1963 (MSFOu 101, 109, 111, 114, 116, 134).

Wogulisches Wörterbuch. Gesammelt und geordnet von Artturi Kannisto. Bearbeitet von Vuokko Eiras. Herausgegeben von Arto Moisio, Helsinki 2013 (LSFU XXXV).

Кошкаревa  Н.  Б.  2002,  Коммуникативная парадигма хантыйского предложения (на материале кaзымского диалекта). — Языки коренных народов Сибири 12, Новосибирск, 29—44.

Ромбандеева  Е.  И.  1979,  Синтаксис мансийского (вогульского) языка, Москва: Hаука.

Back to Issue