RESEARCH CONSORTIA DETERMINE A SIGNIFICANT PART OF THE BIBLIOMETRIC VISIBILITY OF ESTONIAN SCIENCE; pp. 287–308Full article in PDF format | https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2019.3.02
The study looks from a bibliometric perspective on how international collaboration affects Estonian science. The metrics for the study are retrieved using online InCites database (Clarivate Analytics). Results show that research consortia determine a significant part of the bibliometric visibility. An increase in impact from collaborations in consortia was largest in molecular biology and genetics, clinical medicine, and physics. Unfortunately, collaborations in consortia have also created a challenge from an evaluation viewpoint on how to measure scientific impact. Are hyper-authored articles worth as much as ordinary articles? If collaborations in consortia were excluded, then the largest increase in impact from internationalization over the observed period was seen in space science, followed by immunology, psychiatry/psychology, pharmacology, and toxicology.
Adams, Jonathan (2013) “Collaborations: the fourth age of research”. Nature 497, 7451, 557–560.
Allik, Jüri (2013) “Factors affecting bibliometric indicators of scientific quality”. Trames 17, 3, 199–214.
Allik, Jüri (2015) “Progress in Estonian science viewed through bibliometric indicators (2004–2014)”. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences 64, 2, 125–126.
Arunachalam, S. and M. J. Doss (2000) “Science in a small country at a time of globalisation: domestic and international collaboration in new biology research in Israel”. Journal of Information Science 26, 1, 39–49.
Boffito, Daria C., Christian A. Patience, Paul A. Patience, François Bertrand, and Gregory S. Patience (2016) “How do you write and present research well? 8 – Assign authorship according to intellectual involvement”. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 94, 6, 127–1134.
Bordons, Marıa, Borja Gonzalez-Albo, Javier Aparicio, and Luz Moreno (2014) “The influence of R&D intensity of countries on the impact of international collaborative research: evidence from Spain”. Scientometrics 102, 2, 1385–1400.
Bornmann, Lutz (2013) “How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 64 ,3. 587–595.
Bornmann, Lutz and Robin Haunschild (2016) “Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact?” Scientometrics 110, 2, 937–943.
Clarivate Analytics (2018) Essential Science Indicators Research Areas.
Clarivate Analytics (2018) InCites indicators handbook. Clarivate Analytics.
de Beaver, D. B. and R. Rosen (1978) “Studies in scientific collaboration. Part 2: Scientific co-authorship, research productivity and visibility in the French scientific elite, 1799–1830”. Scientometrics 1, 2, 133–149.
de Solla Price, Derek J. (1962) Little science, big science – and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
Garfield, Eugene (1979) Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Gonzalez-Brambila, N. Claudia, Francisco M. Veloso, and David Krackhardt (2013) “The impact of network embeddedness on research output”. Research Policy 42, 9, 1555–1567.
Griliches, Zvi (1979) “Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth”. 10,1, 92–116.
Hayati, Zouhayr and Fereshteh Didegah (2010) “International scientific collaboration among Iranian researchers during 1998-2007”. Library Hi Tech 28, 3, 433–446.
Hirv, Tanel (2018) “Effects of European Union funding and international collaboration on Estonian scientific impact”. Journal of Scientometric Research 7, 3, 181–188.
Katz, J. Sylvan and Ben R. Martin (1997) “What is research collaboration?”. Research Policy 26, 1, 1–18. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1.
Kaur, Jasleen, Emilio Ferrara, Filippo Menczer, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Radicchi (2015) “Quality versus quantity in scientific impact”. Journal of Informetrics 9, 4, 800–808.
King, Christopher (2013) “Multiauthorpapers: onward and upward”. Annual Report, Thomson Reuters 4. http://archive.annualreport.thomsonreuters.com/2012/_files/pdf/MultiauthorPapers_ChrisKing.pdf.
Kremer, Reinhard K. and Marx Werner (2009) “Aspects of the scientific cooperation of Estonia and Germany in view of bibliometry”. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences 58, 4, 255–262.
Lauk, Kalmer and Jüri Allik (2018) “A puzzle of Estonian science: how to explain unexpected rise of the scientific impact”. Trames22, 4, 329–344.
Layzell, D. T. (1999) “Linking performance to funding outcomes at the state level for public institutions of higher education: past, present, and future”. Research in Higher Education 40, 2, 233–246.
Liesegang, Thomas J., Andrew P. Schachat, and Daniel M. Albert (2010) “Defining authorship for group studies”. American Journal of Ophthalmology 150, 2, 135–137.
Mali, Franc, Toni Pustovrh, Rok Platinovšek, Luka Kronegger, and Anuška Ferligoj (2016) “The effects of funding and co-authorship on research performance in a small scientific community”. Science and Public Policy 44, 1, 486–496.
Melin, G. and O. Persson (1996) “Studying research collaboration using co-authorships”. Scientometrics 36, 3, 363–377.
Merton, Robert King (1973) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. -Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mohallem, José R. and Norma E. da Fonseca (2015) “Brazilian impact factor of physics journals – the third side of the coin”. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 82, 2, 1233–1238.
Must, Ülle (2014) “The impact of multi-authored papers – the case of a small country”. Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management 8, 1, 41–47. doi:10.1080/09737766.2014.916874.
Nguyen, Tuan V., Thao P. Ho-Le, and Ut V. Le (2017) “International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: an analysis of patterns and impact”. Scientometrics 110, 2, 1035–1051.
Rousseau, Ronald, Leo Egghe, and Raf Guns (2018). Becoming metric-wise: a bibliometric guide for researchers. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
Saublens, Christian (2014) Participation of EU13 countries in FP7: Mobilising Institutional Reforms for Better RDI Systems/ Institutions in Europe. Part 1: MIRRIS, 200.
Schiermeier, Quirin (2019) “How Estonia blazed a trail in science – a small nation found strength in research after joining the European Union”. Nature 565, 416–418.
Ukrainski, Kadri, Jaan Masso, and Hanna Kanep (2014) “Cooperation patterns in science within Europe: the standpoint of small countries”. Scientometrics 99, 3, 845–863.
Back to Issue