ACCEPTABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE SOURCES OF INEQUALITY IN ROMANIA. A VISUAL STUDY; pp. 367–402Full article in PDF format | DOI: 10.3176/tr.2015.4.04
The paper submits the results of a visual research on the perception of inequality within Romanian society. The data were collected by means of drawings, an uncommon method used in studying social stratification. The analysis was applied to 82 drawings obtained from 41 Romanians (and 16 drawings obtained from 8 Italians added to the former, in an attempt to explore differences cross-nationally). The results refer to the resources that are perceived to be unequally distributed in Romania, to the acceptable sources of inequality in Romania and, in exploratory terms, to the comparative analysis upon the perception of inequality in Romania and Italy. The commonest inequality perceived in Romania is the economic inequality. Here, one of the acceptable sources of inequality is related to the prestige of professions, and one of the unacceptable sources of inequality is the qualitative dimension of lifestyle: dissatisfaction, discontent, unhappiness.
Bagnoli, A. (2009) “Beyond the standard interview: the use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods”. Qualitative Research 9, 5, 547–570. Available online at <http://qrj.sagepub.com/ content/9/5/547>. Accessed on 03.11.2015.
Binelli, C., M. Loveless, and S.Whitefield (2015) “What is social inequality and why does it matter? Evidence from central and eastern Europe”. World Development 70, 239–248.
Cherkaoui, M. (1996) “Inegalităţi sociale”. In Dicționar de sociologie, 133–134. Bucharest: Univers Enciclopedic.
Cherkaoui, M. (1997) “Stratificarea”. In R. Boudon, ed. Tratat de sociologie, 111–174. Bucharest: Humanitas.
Elden, S. (2013) “Inviting the messy: drawing methods and ‘children’s voices’”. Childhood 20, 1, 66–81.
Galman, S. (2009) “The truthful messenger: visual methods and representation in qualitative research in education”. Qualitative Research 9, 2, 197–217.
Grusky, D. (2000) 2Social stratification2. In Gale encyclopedia of sociology, vol. 4, 2807–2821. E. Borgatta and Montgomery, R., eds. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.
Guillemin, M. (2004) “Understanding illness: using drawings as a research method”. Qualitative Health Research 14, 2, 272–289.
Heyns, B. (2005) “Emerging inequalities in central and eastern Europe”. Annual Rreview of Sociology 31, 163–197.
Holm, G. (2008) “Photography as a performance [34 paragraphs]”. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9, 2, Art. 38. Available online at <http:// nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0802380>. Accessed on 03.11.2015.
Loveless, M. and S. Whitefield (2011) “Being unequal and seeing inequality: explaining the political significance of social inequality in new market democracies”. European Journal of Political Research 50, 2, 239–266.
Kearney, K. and A. Hyle (2004) “Drawing out emotions: the use of participant – produces drawings in qualitative inquiry”. Qualitative Research 4, 3, 361–382.
Kelley, J. and M. D. Evans (1993) “The legitimation of inequality: attitudes towards inequality in nine nations”. American Journal of Sociology 99, 75–125.
Kerbo, H. R. (2009) Social stratification and inequality: class conflict in historical, comparative, and global perspective. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Kortesluoma R. L., Punamäki R. L. and Nikkonen M. (2008) “Hospitalized children drawing their pain: the contents and cognitive and emotional characteristics of pain drawings”. Journal of Child Health Care 12, 4, 284–300.
Kuhn, P. (2003) “Thematic drawing and focused, episodic interview upon the drawing – a method in order to approach to the children's point of view on movement, play and sports at school
[50 paragraphs]”. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 4, 1, Art. 8. Available online at <http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs030187>. Accessed on 03.11.2015.
Marshall, G., ed. (2003) Dicționar de sociologie. Bucharest: Univers Enciclopedic.
Mărginean, I. (2011) „Tendinţe recente în constituirea clasei sociale mijlocii în România”. Calitatea Vieţii 22, 1, 3–11.
Molnar, M. (2010) “Inegalitatea veniturilor gospodăriilor în România”. Romanian Statistical Review 10, 30–54.
Mutonyi, H. and M. Kendrick (2011) “Cartoon drawing as a means of accessing what students know about HIV/AIDS: an alternative method”. Visual Communication 10, 2, 231–249.
Pasti, V. (2003) Ultima inegalitate. Relațiile de gen în România. Iași: Polirom.
Phillips, J., J. Ogden, and C. Copland (2015) “Using drawings of pain-related images to understand the experience of chronic pain: a qualitative study”. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 78, 7, 404–411. Available online at <http://bjo.sagepub.com/content/78/7/404>. Accessed on 03.11.2015.
Rashotte, L. S. and M. Webster (2005) “Gender status beliefs”. Social Science Research 34, 618–633.
Reay, D. (1998) “Rethinking social class: qualitative perspectives on class and gender”. Sociology 32, 2, 259–275.
Revilla, J. C, S. Jefferys, and F. J. Tovar Martinez (2013) “Collective identities in the age of restructuring: old and new class, space and community-based identities in six European regions”. International Sociology 28, 4, 391–408.
Ridgeway, C. (2001) “Inequality, status, and the construction of status beliefs”. In Handbook of sociological theory. R. J. Turner, ed. New York: Kluwer Academic.
Ridgeway, C. (2011) Framed by gender: how gender inequality persists in the modern world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Róbert, P. and T. Keller (2011) “Structural components of lifestyle and beyond: the case of Hungary”. Studies of Transition States and Societies 3, 1, 55–75.
Rose, S. and C. Viju (2014) “Income inequality in post-communist central and eastern European countries”. Eastern Journal of European Studies 5, 1, 5–19.
Sernau, S. (2011) Social inequality in a global age. Los Angeles, London: SAGE.
Travers, M. (1999) “Qualitative sociology and social class”. Sociological Research Online 4, 1. Available online at <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/1/travers.html>. Accessed on 03.11.2015.
Tufiș, P. A. (2012) Status attainment: predictable patterns or trendless fluctuation? Iași: Institutul European.
Vasile, O. M. (2008) “Stratificare socială în România: o analiză de clase latente”. Calitatea Vieţii 19, 3–4, 365–388.
Veblen, T. (2009) The theory of the leisure class. New York: Oxford University Press.
Verwiebe, R. and B. Wegener (2000) “Social inequality and the perceived income justice gap”. Social Justice Research 13, 2, 123–149.
Voicu, B., and M. Vasile (2010) “Rural–urban inequalities and expansion of tertiary education in Romania”. Journal of Social Research and Policy 1, 1, 5–24.Williams, G. and E. Elliott (2010) “Exploring social inequalities in health: the importance of thinking qualitatively”. In I. Bourgeault, R. Dingwall, and R. De Vries, The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research. London: Sage Publications.
Back to Issue