eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
SINCE 1997
TRAMES cover
TRAMES. A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
ISSN 1736-7514 (Electronic)
ISSN 1406-0922 (Print)
Impact Factor (2022): 0.2
PDF | doi: 10.3176/tr.2014.2.03

Dukhong Kim

This paper examines the effect of citizens’ belief in democracy promotion on their foreign policy opinion. While it has been debated whether idealism plays a significant role in accounting for citizens’ opinion on foreign policy, few studies tackle the issue empirically. Two hypotheses are proposed and tested in this study in regards to the effect of an ideal, democracy promotion, on public opinion about troop deployments. It uses the surveys conducted by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs in 1998, 2004, 2008, and 2012. The findings show that democracy promotion is one of the most important sources for citizens’ support for U.S. troop deployment. Also, the effect of democracy promotion depends on political context.


Abramowitz, Alan I. and Kyle L. Saunders (2008) “Is polarization a myth?”. Journal of Politics 70, 2, 542–555.

Aiken, Leona S. and StephenG. West (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting inter­actions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Almond, Gabriel A. (1960[1950]) The American people and foreign policy. 2dn ed. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder (2006) “Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses”. Political Analysis 14, 1, 63–82.

Brands, H. W. (1998) What America owes the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burns, Edward (1957) The American idea of mission: concepts of national purpose and destiny. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Campbell, Agnus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes (1960) The American voter. New York: Wiley.

Chittick, William O., Keith R. Billingsley and Rick Travis (1995) “A three-dimensional model of American foreign policy beliefs”. International Studies Quarterly 39, 3, 313–331.

Conover, Pamela Johnston and Stanley Feldman (1984) “How people organize the political world: a schematic model”. American Journal of Political Science 28, 1, 95–126.

Conover, Pamela Johnston and Virginia Sapiro (1993) “Gender, feminist consciousness, and war”. American Journal of Political Science 37, 4, 1079–1099.

Converse, Philip E. (1964) “The nature of belief systems in mass publics”. In David E. Apter, ed. Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.

Cox, Michael, G. John Ikenberry, and Takashi Inoguchi (2000) American democracy promotion: impulses, strategies, and impacts. New York: Oxford University Press.

Diamond, Larry (1992) “Promoting democracy”. Foreign Policy 87, 25–46.

Eichenberg, Richard C. (2003) “Gender differences in public attitudes toward the use of force by the united states, 1990-2003”. International Security 28, 1, 110–41.

Feldman, Stanley (1988) “Structure and consistency in public opinion: the role of core beliefs and values.” American Journal of Political Science 32, 416–440.

Fox, John and Jangman Hong (2009) “Effect displays in R for multinomial and proportional-odds logit models: extensions to the effects package”. Journal of Statistical Software 32, 1, 1–24

Hartz, Louis (1955) The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt.

Herrmann, Richard K., Philip E. Tetlock, and Penny S. Visser (1999) “Mass public decisions to go to war: a cognitive-interactionist framework”. American Political Science Review 93, 3, 553–573.

Holsti, Ole R. (1992) “Public opinion and foreign policy: challenges to the almond-lippmann consensus”. International Studies Quarterly 36, 4, 439–466.

Holsti, Ole R. (2004) Public opinion and American foreign policy. Revised ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Hunt, Michael H. (1987) Ideology and U.S. foreign policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Hurwitz, Jon and Mark Peffley (1987) “How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model”. The American Political Science Review 81, 4, 1099–1120.

Inglehart, Ronald and Paul R. Abramson (1994) “Economic Security and Value Change”. American Political Science Review 88, 2, 336–354.

Jentleson, Bruce W. (1992) “The pretty prudent public: post post-Vietnam American opinion on the use of military force”. International Studies Quarterly 36, 1, 49–74.

Jentleson, Bruce W. and Rebecca L. Britton (1998) “Still pretty prudent: post-Cold War American public opinion on the use of military force”. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42, 4, 395–417.

Kam, Cindy D. and Franzese Jr. Robert J. (2007) Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Kennan, George Frost. (1984) American diplomacy. Expanded ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kinder, Donald R. (1983) “Diversity and complexity in american public opinion”. In Ada W. Finiter, ed. The state of the discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.

Kristol, William and Robert Kagan (1996) “Toward a neo-Reaganite foreign policy”. Foreign Affairs 75, 4, 18–32.

Lieven, Anatol (2004) America right or wrong: an anatomy of American nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lippmann, Walter (1955) Essays in the public philosophy. Boston: Little Brown.

Lipset, Seymour Martin (1996) American exceptionalism: a double-edged sword. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

McCartney, Paul T. (2004) “American nationalism and U.S. foreign policy from September 11 to the Iraq War.” Political Science Quarterly 119, 3, 399–423.

McDougall, Walter (1997) Promised land, crusader state: the American encounter with the world since 1776. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Monten, Jonathan (2005) “The roots of the Bush doctrine: power, nationalism, and democracy promotion in USs.” International Security 29, 4, 112–156.

Morgenthau, Hans J. (1952) “Another great debate: the national interest of the United States”. American Political Science Review 46, 4, 961–988.

Myrdal, Gunnar (1944) An American dilemma: the Negro problem and modern democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.

Nincic, Miroslav (1997) “Domestic costs, the U.S. public, and the isolationist calculus”. Inter­national Studies Quarterly 41, 4, 593–610.

Osgood, Robert Endicott (1953) Ideals and self-interest in America’s foreign relations: the great transformation of the twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Paine, Thomas (1984) Rights of man. New York: Penguin Classics.

Peffley, Mark A. and Jon Hurwitz (1992) “International events and foreign policy beliefs: public reactions to changing Soviet–U.S. relations.” American Journal of Political Science 36, 2, 431–461.

Richman, Alvin, Eloise Malone, and David B. Nolle (1997) “Testing foreign policy belief structures of the American public in the post-cold war period.” Political Research Quarterly 50, 4, 18.

Rokeach, Milton (1973) The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

Rokeach, Milton and Sandra J. Ball-Rokeach (1989) “Stability and change in American value priorities, 1968-1981”. American Psychologist 44, 5, 775–784.

Schlesinger Jr., Arthur (1986) The cycles of American history. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Schwartz, Shalom H. (1992) “Universals in the content and structure of values”. In M. P. Zanna, ed. Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.

Schwartz, Shalom H. (1994) “Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?”. Journal of Social Issues 50, 1, 19–45.

Sears, David O. (1993) “Symbolic politics”. In Shanto Iyengar and William J. McGuire, eds. Explorations in political psychology. Durham, NC.: Duke University Press.

Tocqueville, Alexis de (1966) Democracy in America. New York: HarperPerennial.

Walker, Thomas (2008) “Two faces of liberalism: Kant, Paine, and the question of intervention”. International Studies Quarterly 52, 3, 449–468.

Wittkopf, Eugene R. (1986) “On the foreign policy beliefs of the American people: a critique and some evidence”. International Studies Quarterly 30, 4, 425–445.

Wittkopf, Eugene R. (1990) Faces of internationalism: public opinion and American foreign policy. NC, Durham: Duke University Press.

Back to Issue