EUROPEAN UNION’S POSITIVE CONDITIONALITY MODEL IN PRE-ACCESSION PROCESS; pp. 207-231Full article in PDF format
| DOI: 10.3176/tr.2009.3.02
Abstract The concept of positive conditionality has been seenas ‘the golden carrot’ of the EU’s external relations, enlargement and neighbourhood policies. Regarded as a mutually important and valuable method of partnership between the EU and its partner countries to develop social, political and economic progress with an effective motivation system, positive conditionality is nowadays used in areas ranging from development cooperation to neighbourhood policy, and most successfully in the enlargement agenda. The EU and its member states have characterised conditionality as a functional cooperation or pre-accession method of integration, where guidance and strict rules are needed to provide effective convergence with the EU and to support transitional societies in the modernisation process. The motivation of conditionality has been characterised as functional and in the mutual interests of both the target states and the EU. This paper will study the driving force behind the pre-accession conditionality from the first to fifth enlargements: has it been a neo-functional motive to support the fulfilment of accession criteria by candidates, or a neo-imperial motive to use the accession conditionality mainly in the interests of the existing member states to fix their advantages in economic and political affairs? This paper will offer a comparative analysis on the pre-accession situation, conditionality levels and argumentation of motivation for the first five EU enlargements.
References Barro, Robert J. (1997) Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
Batory, Agnes (2008) The politics of EU accession. Manchester, Manchester University Press.
Börzel, Tanja and Thomas Risse (2000) “When Europe hits home: Europeanization and domestic change”. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 4, 15, available at http: //eiop.or.at/ eiop/pdf/2000-015.pdf, checked 03.03.2009.
Bulmer, Simon andChristian Lequesne (2005) The member states of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Checkel, Jeffrey (2000) “Compliance and Conditionality”. Arena Working Papers WP 00/18.
Collier, Paul (1999) “Learning from failure: the international financial institutions as agencies of restraint in Africa”. In The self-restraining state: power and accountability in new democracies. Andrea Schedler, Larry Diamond, and Marc Plattner, eds. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Collier, Paul and David Dollar (1998) “Aid allocation and poverty reduction”. (World Bank, Research Paper.) Washington, DC.: World Bank.
Council of the European Union (1997) common position on conflict prevention and resolution in Africa. Brussels, Official Journal 2 June, No. L153.
Crawford, Gordon (2001) Foreign aid and political reform: a comparative analysis of political conditionality and democracy assistance. London: Palgrave.
Delattre, Lucas (1977) “Les pays candidats à l'entrée dans l'Union ont des atouts économiques encore insuffisants”. Le Monde 12 December.
European Commission (1972) “Commission opinion on the applications for accession to the European communities by the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Kingdom of Norway and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland”. Documents concerning the accessions to the European Communities of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic. Tome II. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
European Commission (1976) “Opinion on Greek application for Membership”.In European Navigator, available at http: //www.ena.lu/commission_opinion_greek_application_
membership_29_january_1976-020002562.html, checked 03.03.2009.
European Commission (1978) “Opinion on Portuguese application for membership’ (transmitted to the Council by the Commission on 19 May 1978)”. European Navigator, available
at http: //www.ena.lu/commission_opinion_portugals_application_accession_
19_1978-020002551.html, checked 03.03.2009.
European Commission (1978) “Opinion on Spain’s application for membership (transmitted to the Council by the Commission on 29 November 1978)”. European Navigator, available at
november-1978-020002632.html, checked 03.03.2009.
European Commission (1978) “Communication from the Commission on the transitional period”. European Navigator, available at http: //www.ena.lu/communication_commission_ transitional_period_1978-020003449.html, checked 03.03.2009.
European Commission (1992) “The challenge of enlargement – Commission opinion on Austria’s application for membership”. European Navigator, available at http: //www.ena.lu/ commission_opinion_austria_application_membership_31_july_
1991-020003546.html, checked 03.03.2009.
European Commission (1994) “Commission opinion of 19 April 1994 on the applications for accession to the European Union by the Republic of Austria, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Norway”. Official Journal of the European Communities (OJEC) 29 August, No. C 241, p. 3.
European Commission (2000) “Communication Strategy for Enlargement”. European Navigator, available at http: //www.ena.lu/european_commission_communication_ii_agenda_
2000_challenge_enlargement_1997-020006132.html, checked 03.03.2009.
European Commission (2001) Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the European Union’s role in promoting human rights and democratization in third countries, available at http: //ec.europa.eu/external_relations/
human_rights/doc/com01_252_en.pdf, checked 03.03.2009
European Commission (2003) “Comprehensive monitoring report of the European Commission on the state of preparedness for EU membership of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia”. Official Journal of the European Union 23.3.2004, EN C 73/79
European Council (1992) Presidency conclusions (Edinburgh 11–12 December 1992), SN 456/92 Part A. Brussels: Council of the European Communities, December, p. 6.
European Council (1993) Presidency conclusions (Brussels 23 October), pp. 9–10.
European Council (1993) “Presidency conclusions, European Council of Copenhagen”. European Navigator, available at http: //www.ena.lu/conclusions_copenhagen_european_
council_extract_concerning_enlargement_2122_june_1993-020006502.html, checked 03.03.2009
European Council (1994) “Conclusions of the presidency European Council of Essen”. European Navigator, available at http: //www.ena.lu/essen_european_council_essen_910_december_
1994-020705181.html, checked 03.03.2009
European Council (1997) “Presidency conclusions, European Council of Luxembourg”. European Navigator, available at http: //www.ena.lu/conclusions_luxembourg_european_council_
12_13_december_1997-020005307.html, checked 03.03.2009
European Council (1999) “Presidency conclusions, European Council of Helsinki”. European Navigator, available at http://www.ena.lu/conclusions-helsinki-european-council-extract-concerning-preparations-
enlargement-1011-december-1999-020005292.html, checked 03.03.2009
Fierro, Elena (2003) The EU’s approach to human rights conditionality in practice. London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Gerson, Harry (1976) “Un succès pour Constantin Caramanlis”. Le Figaro 11 February.
Grabbe, Heather (2001) “How does Europanisation affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity”. Journal of European Public Policy 8, 6, 1013–1031.
Groningen Growth and Development Centre and the Conference Board (2007), available at http: //www.ggdc.net/databases/, checked 03.03.2009
Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (1971) “The United Kingdom and the European communities”. Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty. London, July.
Keohane, Robert O. (2002) “Ironies of Sovereignty”. Journal of Common Market Studies 40, 4, 743–765.
Killick, Tony (1998) Aid and the political economy of policy change. London: ODI.
NationMaster, GDP per capita PPP, available at http: //www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_gdp_ percap-economy-gdp-per-capita, checked 12.06.2007
OECD, Unemployment 1952-1992 in OECD countries, available at http: //stats.oecd.org/ WBOS/Default.aspx?QueryName=251&QueryType=View, checked 12.06.2007
Official Journal of the European Union (2003) Documents concerning the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union 46, L 236 23 September.
Ortega, Andrés (1985) “No se renegociará la adhesión de España a la CEE en el terreno agriola”. El País 16 July.
Patten, Christopher (1999) “The future of the european security and defence policy (ESDP) and the role of the European Commission”. Paper presented at the conference on the development of a common European security and defence policy, Berlin 16 December.
Santiso, Carlos (2002) “Governance conditionality and the reform of multilateral development finance: the role of the group of eight”. G8 Governance 7 (March). Toronto: G8 Information Centre.
Schimmelfennig, Frank, Stefan Engert, and Heiko Knobel (2006) International socialization in the New Europe: European organizations, political conditionality, and democratic change. Basingstoke Palgrave: Macmillan.
Schimmelfennig, Frank and Ulrich Sedelmeier (2007) “Candidate countries and conditionality”. In Europeanization: new research agendas, 88–101. Paolo Graziano and Maarten Vink, eds. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sedelmeier, Ulrich (2006) “Pre-accession conditionality and post-accession compliance in the new member states: a research note”. In Après enlargement: legal and political responses in central and eastern European, 145–160. Wojciech Sadurski, Jacques Ziller, and Karolina Zurek, eds. Florence: European University Institute.
Sedelmeier, Ulrich (2007) “The European neighbourhood policy: a comment on theory and policy”. In Governing Europe's neighbourhood: Partners or Periphery?, 195–208. Katja Weber, Michael E. Smith, and Michael Baun, eds.Manchester University Press.
Smith, Karen E. (1997) “The use of political conditionality in the EC/EU’s relations with third countries: how effective?”. EC/EUI Working Papers, SPS No. 97/7.
Soares, Mário (1977) “Discours à la Commission européenne (Bruxelles 11 mars 1977)”. Bulletin des Communautés européennes 3, 8–9.
Solana, Javier (2003) “A secure Europe in a better world”. Paper presented at the European Council, Thessaloniki 20 June.
Steinitz, Klaus (2002) “The accession of the GDR to the Federal Republic – the first step to eastward expansion of the EU?”, available at http: //www.epoc.uni-bremen.de/publications/pup2003/ files/Budapest_Steinitz.PDF, checked 03.03.2009
Stokke, Olav (1995) Aid and political cConditionality. London: Franck Cass.
Thatcher, Margaret (1993) The Downing Street years. London: Harper Collins Publishers.
Veebel, Viljar (2004) “Conditionality and dependence as key elements in simultaneous democratization and crises prevention”. In The Estonian foreign policy yearbook. Andres Kasekamp, ed. Tallinn: Varrak.
Weber, Steven (1995) “European Union conditionality”. In Politics and institutions in an integrated Europe, 193–222. Barry Eichengreen, Jeffrey Frieden, and Jurgen von Hagen, eds. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
WolfSusanna and Dominik Spoden (2000) Allocation of EU aid towards ACP-countries. (ZEF-Discussion Papers on Development Policy, 22.) Bonn: Center for Development Research (ZEF). Zielonka, Jan (2006) Europe as empire. The nature of the enlarged European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Back to Issue