The paper deals with the transformation of a transition society (using Estonia as an example) into knowledge-based society, and developing doctoral studies as its key element. Doctoral studies gained impetus from the second half of the 1990’s and in conformity with the Bologna process, principles applied in European universities infrastructure, doctoral study programmes and a new paradigm of supervision are developed. To improve cooperation of numerous new supervisors and doctoral students it is necessary to rely more on the international experience in organising modern research-based studies, applying supervision methods and research collaboration of different sectors of society. The core problems discussed in the paper include the institutional organisation of doctoral studies, cooperation of students and supervisors, and the collaboration of academia and industry in training and using top level specialists.
Delamont, S., P.Atkinson, and O. Parry, eds. (2001) Supervising the PhD. A guide to success. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Doctoral programmes for the European knowledge society (2005) Report on the EUA doctoral programmes project 2004-2005. http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/Doctoral_Programmes_ Project_Report.1129278878120.pdf/ (accessed 20 May 2005).
Geiger, R. (1997) “Doctoral education: the short-term crisis vs. long-term challenge”. The Review of Higher Education 20, 3, 239–251.
doi:10.1353/rhe.1997.0002
Harland, T. and G. Plangger (2004) “The postgraduate chameleon. Changing roles in doctoral education”. Active learning in higher education 5, 1, 73–86.
doi:10.1177/1469787404040462
Holligan, C. (2005) “Fact and fiction: a case history of doctoral supervision”. Educational Research 47, 3, 267–278.
doi:10.1080/00131880500287179
Jacob, M. and T. Hellström, eds. (2000) The future of knowledge production in the academy. Buckingham: The Society for research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Jarvis, P. (1999) “Global trends in lifelong learning and the response of the universities”. Comparative Education 35, 2, 249–257.
doi:10.1080/03050069928017
Jarvis, P. (2000) “Globalisation, the learning society and comparative education”. Comparative Education 36, 3, 343–355.
doi:10.1080/713656613
Kendall, G. (2002) “The crisis in doctoral education: a sociological diagnosis [1]”. Higher Education Research & Development 21, 2, 131–141.
doi:10.1080/07294360220144051
Kärner, A., H. Kukemelk, and R. J. Herdlein (2005) “Motivation for obtaining the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the post-Soviet era: the case of Estonia”. International Education 35, 1, 24–35.
Lauristin, M. and P. Vihalemm, eds. (1997) Return to the western world: cultural and political perspectives on the Estonian post-communist transition. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
Leshem, S. and V. Trafford (2007) ”Overlooking the conceptual framework”. Innovations in education and Teaching International 44, 1, 93–105.
doi:10.1080/14703290601081407
McWilliam, E., P. Singh, and P. G. Taylor (2002) ”Doctoral education, danger and risk management”. Higher Education Research & Development 21, 2, 119–124.
doi:10.1080/07294360220144042
Moon, J. (2002) The module and programme development handbook: a practical guide to linking levels, learning outcomes and assessment. London: Routledge Falmer.
Morgan, D. L. (1988) Focus groups as qualitative research. (Qualitative Research Methods, 16.) Newbury Park, Beverly Hills, London, and New Delhi: SAGEPublications.
Pearson, M. (1999) “The changing environment for doctoral education in Australia: implications for quality management, improvement and innovation”. Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 3, 269–286.
doi:10.1080/0729436990180301
Puura, V., A. Kärner, and E. Voolaid, eds. (2005). Eesti doktoriõppe kvaliteedi, tulemuslikkuse ja jätkusuutlikkuse tagamise süsteem: artiklid ja edulood. I. [Assurance system for quality, effectiveness and sustainability of doctoral studies in Estonian universities. I.] Tartu: Tartu University Press. (Summaries in English.)
Puura, V., A. Kärner, E. Voolaid, and M. Saluveer, eds. (2006) Eesti doktoriõppe kvaliteedi, tulemuslikkuse ja jätkusuutlikkuse tagamise süsteem : ettekanded ja uurimused. II. [Assurance system for quality, effectiveness and sustainability of doctoral studies in Estonian universities. II.] Tartu: Tartu University Press. (Summaries in English.)
Puura, V., A. Kärner, E. Voolaid, and M. Saluveer, eds. (2007) Eesti doktoriõppe kvaliteedi, tulemuslikkuse ja jätkusuutlikkuse tagamise süsteem : ettekanded ja artiklid. III.[Assurance system for quality, effectiveness and sustainability of doctoral studies in Estonian universities. III.] Tartu: Tartu University Press. (Summaries in English.)
Puura, V., T. Lehtsaar, and A. Kärner, eds. (2004). Meetmete kogumi väljatöötamine doktoriõppe tugevdamiseks Eestis. Phare projekt. [Development of a complex of measures for strengthening doctoral studies in Estonia.] Manuscript. Tartu: Phare.
Realising the European higher education area. Communiqué of the conference of ministers responsible for higher education in Berlin on 19 September 2003. http://www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/Communique1.pdf/ (accessed 19 September 2006).
Reich, R. B. (1991) The work of nations: preparing ourselves for 21st-century capitalism. London: Simon & Schuster.
