In this paper conflict within couples is studied qualitatively in a Mexican context. The objective is to analyze the areas of conflict within couples of diverse sex and sexual orientation, focused on the areas of conflict in an intimate couple. Methodology: 61 narratives (43 interviews and 18 photo-interventions) were analyzed with Ground Theory. Results: Partners usually have a set of expectations that define their relationship. Generally, a partner’s behavior is evaluated according to expectations shaped by time, communication, resources, emotion, body, and preferences. Dissatisfaction and attempts to control the partner’s behavior arise when expectations are not accomplished, leading to conflicts in the couple’s relationship. Conclusion: The participants in this study, even with different sex and sexual orientation, demonstrated common patterns of areas of conflict.
Alonso, M. M., K. S. López, S. E. Esparza, R. Martínez, F. R. Guzmán, and B. A. Alonso (2011) “Violencia contra la mujer y su relación con el consumo de drogas en el área metropolitana de Monterrey, Nuevo León, México”. Investigación en Enfermería. Imagen y Desarrollo 11, 1, 81–95.
American Psychological Association (2010) The publication manual of the American Psychological Association. 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Atlas.ti 2003. The knowledge workbench. Visual qualitative data analysis (version WIN 5.0) [Software for computer]. Berlin: Scientific Software development.
Bartos, O. and P. Wehr (2002) Using conflict theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613692
Bland W., V. Busam, B. Gunlogson, G. Mekkes, and A. Saunders (2004) Audacity 1.2.3. Available online at <htpp://audacity.sourceforge.net/>. Accessed on 30.01.2006.
Bloom B. L., W. F. Hodges, and R. A. Caldwell (1983) “Marital separation: the first eight months”. In E. J. Callahan and K. A. McCluskey, eds. Life-span developmental psychology: non-normative life events, 217–239. New York: Academic Press.
Breck, E. (1998) SoundScriber. Transcriptor computacional para el proyecto MICASE, English Language Institute, University of Michigan. Available online at <http://www.lsa.umich.edu/ eli/micase/soundscriber.html>. Accessed on 15.05.2006.
Cantera, L. (2009) “La fotointervenció com a eina docent”. Rep:TE. Revista d’Ensenyament de la Psicologia: Teoria i Experiència 5, 18–30.
Cantera, L. (2010) “La fotointervención como técnica de concienciación de la violencia de género”. In Gênero & Saúde: diálogos Ibero-Americanos. M. Ruwer, ed. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs.
Castoriadis, C. (1986) El Campo de lo social histórico. México: ANUIES.
CmapsTools (2007) Knowledge modelling kit v4.10 WIN. University affiliate research institute. Available online at <htpp://cmap.ihmc.us>. Accessed on 20.05.2005.
Coser, L. (1956) The function of social conflict. New York: The Free Press.
Davis, S. N. and T. N. Greenstein (2009) “Gender ideology: components, predictors, and consequences”. Annual Review of Sociology 35, 87–105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920
Frost, A. E. and F. N. Dodoo (2010) “The man comes to marry the woman: exploring adolescent boys’ gendered expectations for bridewealth and marriage among the akwapim of Southern Ghana”. Marriage & Family Review 46, 1–2, 41–59.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01494921003648563
Ibañez, T. ( 2004) “El cómo y el por qué de la psicología social”. In Introducción a la psicología social, 51–92. T. Ibañez, ed. Barcelona: UOC.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, INEGI (1999) Violencia intrafamiliar encuesta 1999: Documento metodológico y resultados. México: INEGI.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, INEGI (2004) Encuesta nacional sobre la dinámica de las relaciones en los hogares, 2003: ENDIREH. Características metodológicas. México: INEGI.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, INEGI (2007) Encuesta nacional sobre la dinámica de las relaciones en los hogares, 2006: ENDIREH. Marco conceptual. México: INEGI.
Híjar-Medina, M., L. Flores-Regata, R. Valdez-Santiago, and J. Blanco (2003) “Atención médica de lesiones intencionales provocadas por la violencia familiar”. Salud Pública Mexico 45, 252–258.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-36342003000400003
Horwitz, S., L. Santiago, J. Pearson, and M. LaRussa-Trott (2009) “Relational tools for working with mild-to-moderate couple violence: patterns of unresolved conflict and pathways to resolution”. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 40, 3: 249–256.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012992
Klevens, J., G. Shelley, C. Clavel-Arcas, D. D. Barney, C. Tobar, E. Duran, R. Barajas-Mazaheri, and J. Esparza (2007) “Latinos perspective and experiences with intimate partner violence”. Violence Against Women 13, 2, 141–158.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801206296980
Kriesberg, L. (1998) Social conflict. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kurdek, L. A. (1994) “Areas of conflict for gay, lesbian and heterosexual couples: what couples argue about influences relationship satisfaction”. Journal of Marriage and Family 56, 4, 923–934.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353603
Lee, S. H. (2008) “Marriage expectation and related factors among college students”. Korean Journal of Women Heath Nursing, 14(2), 124–130.
Marshall, A. D., D. E. Jones, and M. E. Feinberg (2011) “Enduring vulnerabilities, relationship attributions, and couple conflict: an integrative model of the occurrence and frequency of intimate partner violence”. Journal of Family Psychology 25, 5, 709–718.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025279
Mendizábal, N. (2006) “Los componentes del diseño flexible en la investigación cualitativa”. In Estrategias de investigación cualitativa, 65–105. I. Vasilachis, coord. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Ramírez-Rodríguez, J. C. (2006) “Male violence against heterosexual partners: facts and challenges”. Salud Pública de México 48, s315–s327.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-36342006000800012
Ross, M. H. (1983) “Political decision making and conflict: additional cross-cultural codes and scales”. Ethnology 22, 2, 169–192.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3773578
Sanford, K. (2007a) “The couples emotion rating form: psychometric properties and theoretical associations”. Psychological Assessment 19, 411–421.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.411
Sanford, K. (2007b) “Hard and soft emotion during conflict: Investigating married couples and other relationships”. Personal Relationships 14, 65–90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00142.x
Sanford, K. (2010) “Perceived threat and perceived neglect: couples’ underlying concerns during conflict”. Psychological Assessment 22, 2, 288–297.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018706
Simmel, G. (1903) “The sociology of conflict”. American Journal of Sociology, 490–525.
Spanier, G. B. (1976) “Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads”. Journal of Marriage and the Family 38, 1, 15–28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/350547
Saucedo, I. (2009) “Familia y violencia. Violencia doméstica y sexual”. Demos 8, 32–35.
Straus, M. (1979) “Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics (CT) scales”. Journal of Marriage and the Family 41, 1, 75–88.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351733
Staruss, A. and J. Corbin (2002) Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquía.
Tillet, G. and B. French (2010) Resolving conflict. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Valdez, R. and C. Juárez (1998) “Impacto de la violencia doméstica en la salud mental de las mujeres: análisis y perspectivas en México”. Salud mental 21, 6, 1–10.
Vázquez, F. (2001) La memoria como acción social. Relaciones, significados e imaginario. Barcelona: Paidós.
Vieyra, C., G. Gurrola, P. Balcázar, M. Bonilla, and J. Virseda (2009) “Estado de salud mental en mujeres víctimas de violencia conyugal que acuden a la Procuraduría General de Justicia del Estado de México”. Psicología Iberoamericana 17, 1, 57–64.
