Contrary to a widely held belief, a strong positive association between individualism and social capital can be observed at the cross-national level of analysis (Realo and Allik, 2009). The present study examines the relationship between social capital and individualism-collectivism at the individual level using nationally representative sample of adults from The Estonian Survey of Culture and Personality (N = 1,451). Results suggest that only one component of individualism—mature self-responsibility – but also peer- and society-related forms of collectivism, exhibited positive associations with social capital. Thus, although the positive relationship between individualism and social capital seems to hold in some respects at the individual level, the relationship between social capital and different components of individualism-collectivism appears rather multi-faceted.
Allik, J. and A. Realo (2004) “Individualism-collectivism and social capital”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 35, 29–49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022103260381
Bond, M. H. (2002) “Reclaiming the individual from Hofstede’s ecological analysis – a 20-year odyssey: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002)” Psychological Bulletin 128, 73–77.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.73
Bourdieu, P. (1985) “The forms of capital”. In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, 241–258. J. G. Richardson, ed. New York: Greenwood Press.
Christoforou, A. (2005) “On the determinants of social capital in Greece compared to countries of the European Union”. FEEM Working Paper 68.
Cox, E. (2002) “Australia: making the lucky country”. In Democracies in flux: the evolution of social capital in contemporary society, 334–358. R. Putnam, ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988) “Social capital in the creation of human capital”. American Journal of Sociology 94, 95–120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228943
Durkheim, E. (1969 [1893]) The division of labor in society. New York: The Free Press. (Original work published 1893).
Fiske, A. P. (2002) “Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures – a critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002)”. Psychological Bulletin 128, 78–88.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.78
Gelfand, M. J., H. C. Triandis, and D. K.-S. Chan (1996) “Individualism versus collectivism or versus authoritarianism?”. European Journal of Social Psychology 26, 397–410.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199605)26:3<397::AID-EJSP763>3.0.CO;2-J
Glaeser, E. L., D. Laibson, and B. Sacerdote (2002) “The economic approach to social capital”. The Economic Journal 112, 437–458.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00078
Halman, L. and R. Luijkx (2006) Social capital in contemporary Europe: evidence from the European Social Survey. Portuguese Journal of Social Science 5, 65–90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/pjss.5.1.65/1
Halpern, D. (2005) Social capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1983) “Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions”. In Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology, 335–355. J. Deregowski, S. Dziurawiec, and
R. C. Annis, eds. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviours, institutions and organizations across nations. Vol. 2. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kaasa, A. and E. Parts (2007) Individual-level determinants of social capital in Europe: differences between country groups. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
Kagitcibasi, C. (2005) “Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 36, 403–422.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275959
Kagitcibasi, C. (2007) Family, self, and human development across cultures: theory and applications. New York: Psychology Press.
Miller, J. G. (2002) “Bringing culture to basic psychological theory – beyond individualism and collectivism: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002)”. Psychological Bulletin 128, 97–109.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.97
Mõttus, R., J. Allik, and A. Realo (2010) “An attempt to validate national mean scores of conscientiousness: no necessarily paradoxical findings”. Journal of Research in Personality 44, 630–640.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.08.005
Offe, C. and S. Fuchs (2002) “A decline of social capital? The German case”. In Democracies in flux: the evolution of social capital in contemporary society, 189–243. R. Putnam, ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ostroff, C. (1993) “Comparing correlations based on individual-level and aggregated data”. Journal of Applied Psychology 78, 569–582.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.569
Oyserman, D., H. M. Coon, and M. Kemmelmeier (2002) “Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses”. Psychological Bulletin 128, 3–72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
Paxton, P. (1999) “Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment”. American Journal of Sociology 105, 88–127.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/210268
Paxton, P. (2002) “Social capital and democracy: an interdependent relationship”. American Sociological Review 67, 254–277.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3088895
Portes, A. (1998) “Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology”. Annual Review of Sociology 24, 1–25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
Portes, A. (2000) “The two meanings of social capital”. Sociological Forum 15, 1–12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007537902813
Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Putnam, R. D. (2002) Democracies in flux: the evolution of social capital in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Realo, A. (2003) “Comparison of public and academic discourses: Estonian individualism and collectivism revisited”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 9, 47–77.
Realo, A. and J. Allik (2009) “On the relationship between social capital and individualism-collectivism”. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3, 1–16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00226.x
Realo, A., J. Allik, and B. Greenfield (2008) “Radius of trust: social capital in relation to familism and institutional collectivism”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 39, 447–462.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022108318096
Realo, A., J. Allik, and M. Vadi (1997) “The hierarchical structure of collectivism”. Journal of Research in Personality 31, 93–116.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2170
Realo, A., K. Koido, E. Ceulemans, and J. Allik (2002) “Three components of individualism”. European Journal of Personality 16, 163–184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.437
Rothstein, B. (2002) “Sweden: social capital in the social democratic state”. In Democracies in flux: the evolution of social capital in contemporary society, 289–331. R. Putnam, ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schimmack, U., S. Oishi, and E. Diener (2005) “Individualism: a valid and important dimension of cultural differences between nations”. Personality and Social Psychology Review 9, 17–31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_2
Skocpol, T. (2002) “United States: from membership to advocacy”. In Democracies in flux: the evolution of social capital in contemporary society, 103–136. R. Putnam, ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Triandis, H. C. and E. M. Suh (2002) “Cultural influences on personality”. Annual Review of Personality 53, 133–160.
Van Oorshot, W. and W. Arts (2005) “Social capital of European welfare states: the crowding out hypothesis revisited”. Journal of European Social Policy 15, 5–26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0958928705049159
Van Oorshot, W., W. Arts, and J. Gelissen (2006) “Social capital in Europe: measurement, and social and regional distribution of a multi-faceted phenomenon”. CCWS Working Paper 44.
Voronov, M. and J. A. Singer (2002) “The myth of individualism-collectivism: a critical review”. Journal of Social Psychology 142, 461–480.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224540209603912
