ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1997
 
TRAMES cover
TRAMES. A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
ISSN 1736-7514 (Electronic)
ISSN 1406-0922 (Print)
Impact Factor (2024): 0.5
Research article
HOW CAN METAPHORS ENHANCE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF MEDIA AND INFORMATION LITERACIES?; pp. 405–422
PDF | https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2025.4.06

Author
Diana Poudel ORCID Icon
Abstract

Explaining abstract concepts to general audiences is a core challenge in media and information literacy. Studies show that metaphors can help translate complexity into ordinary terms, enabling broad audiences to understand, compare, and talk about difficult issues without specialist vocabulary. This article analyses how Estonian experts from academia, defence, media and education use metaphors to explain core media and information literacy concepts. Thirty semi-structured interviews were analysed using qualitative metaphor analysis. Five recurrent source domains emerged: FOOD for production and consumption, WATER for flow and direction, NOISE for overload and interference, PLAYGROUND for cooperation, and BATTLEFIELD for conflict. Careful, context-aware metaphor choice improves teaching, public communication and policy, while careless framing can oversimplify and polarise.

References

Archibald, J. David (2014) Aristotle’s Ladder, Darwin’s Tree: the evolution of visual metaphors for biological order. New York: Columbia University Press. 
https://doi.org/10.7312/arch16412  

Boyd, Richard (1993) “Metaphor and theory change: what is ‘metaphor’ a metaphor for?” In Andrew Ortony, ed. Metaphor and thought, 481–532. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023  

Breeze, Ruth (2011) “Critical discourse analysis and its critics”. Pragmatics 21, 4, 493–525. 
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.4.01bre  

Bruns, Axel (2021) “Echo chambers? Filter bubbles? The misleading metaphors that obscure the real problem.” In Marta Pérez-Escolar and José Manuel Noguera-Vivo, eds Hate speech and polarization in participatory society. Vol. 8, 33–48. Abingdon: Routledge. 
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003109891-4  

Cameron, Lynne (2002) “Metaphors in the learning of science: a discourse focus”. British Educational Research Journal 28, 5, 673–688. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000015534  

Churchill, Winston (1946) The sinews of peace (‘Iron Curtain Speech’). International Churchill Society. Available online at 
https://winstonchurchill.org/resources/speeches/1946-1963-elder-statesman/the-sinews-of-peace/ (Accessed 08.09.2025). 

Cohen, Fred (1987) “Computer viruses: theory and experiments”. Computers & Security 6, 1, 22–35. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4048(87)90122-2  

Cohen, Julie E. (2012) “Privacy, autonomy, and information”. In her Configuring the networked self: law, code, and the play of everyday practice, 107–126. New Haven: Yale University Press. Available online at 
https://www.juliecohen.com/attachments/File/CohenCNSCh5.pdf  

Davenport, Thomas H. and John C. Beck (2001) The attention economy: understanding the new currency of business. Boston: Harvard Business Press. 

Denning, Dorothy Elizabeth Robling (1998) Information warfare and security. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley. 

van Dijk, Teun A. (1993) “Principles of critical discourse analysis”. Discourse & Society 4, 2, 249–283. 
http://www.jstor.org/stable/42888777 (Acessed 4.10.2025). 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006

Edwards, Richard, Katherine Nicoll, Nicky Solomon, and Robin Usher (2004) Rhetoric and educa-tional discourse: persuasive texts. London: Routledge. 

Fairclough, Norman (1989) Language and power. (Language in Social Life Series) London and New York: Longman. 

Fu, Shaoxiong, Hongxiu Li, Yong Liu, Henri Pirkkalainen, and Markus Salo (2020) “Social media overload, exhaustion, and use discontinuance: examining the effects of information overload, system feature overload, and social overload”. Information Processing & Management 57, 6, 102307. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102307  

Fusch, Patricia and Lawrence Ness (2015) “Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research”. The Qualitative Report 20, 9, 1408–1416. 
https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281  

Ghebreyesus, Tedros Adhanom (2020) “Munich Security Conference”. World Health Organization. Available online at 
https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/munich-security-confe-rence (Accessed 17.05.2024). 

Giles, Timothy D. (2007) Motives for metaphor in scientific and technical communication. Amityville, N.Y.: Baywood. 
https://doi.org/10.2190/MFM

Guest, Greg, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson (2006) “How many interviews are enough?” Field Methods 18, 1, 59–82. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903  

Johnson, Clay A. (2012) The information diet: a case for conscious consumption. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media. 

Kirby, John T. (1997) “Aristotle on metaphor”. American Journal of Philology 118, 4, 517–554. 
https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.1997.0056  

Konopasky, Abigail W. and L. Earle Reybold (2015) “Accessing the world: adult literacy educators’ metaphors for learners and learning”. Journal of Transformative Education 13, 3, 239–258. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344615579514  

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. 

Leary, David E. (1994) Metaphors in the history of psychology. Cambridge University Press. 

Lee, Mary (2015) “Critical metaphor analysis of citizenship education discourse”. Public Relations Inquiry 4, 1, 99–123. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X14559934  

Leibenstein, H. (1950) “Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 64, 2, 183–207. 
https://doi.org/10.2307/1882692  

Libicki, Martin C. (1995) What is information warfare? Washington: National Defense University. Available online at 
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA367662.pdf (Accessed 08.09.2025). 
https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA385640

Lloyd, Annemaree (2006) “Information literacy landscapes: an emerging picture”. Journal of Documentation 62, 5, 570–583. 
https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610688723  

McEntee-Atalianis, Lisa J. (2011) “The role of metaphor in shaping the identity and agenda of the United Nations: the imagining of an international community and international threat”. Discourse & Communication 5, 4, 393–412. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311418099  

McNeilly, Mark (2015) Sun Tzu and the art of modern warfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199957859.001.0001

Musolff, Andreas (2012) “The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis”. Critical Discourse Studies 9, 3, 301–310. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688300  

OECD (2019) Skills matter: additional results from the survey of adult skills. (OECD Skills Studies). Paris: OECD. 
https://doi.org/10.1787/1f029d8f-en  

Pariser, Eli (2011) The filter bubble: what the internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin. 
https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431164

Partington, Alan and Anna Marchi (2015) “Using corpora in discourse analysis”. In Douglas Biber and Randi Reppen, eds The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, 216–234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139764377  

Phillips-Wren, Gloria and Monica Adya (2020) “Decision making under stress: the role of information overload, time pressure, complexity, and uncertainty”. Journal of Decision Systems 29, s1, 213–225. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1768680  

Puschmann, Cornelius (2019) “Beyond the bubble: assessing the diversity of political search results”. Digital Journalism 7, 6. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1539626

Rona, Thomas P. (1976) “Weapon systems and information war”. Office of the Secretary of Defense, Washington DC. Available online at 
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/Science_and_Technology/09-F-0070-Weapon-Systems-and-Information-War.pdf (Accessed 08.09.2025). 

Rothkopf, David J. (2003) “When the buzz bites back”. Washington Post. Available online at 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2003/05/11/when-the-buzz-bites-back/bc8cd84f-cab6-4648-bf58-0277261af6cd/ (Accessed 08.09.2025). 

Sandvig, Christian (2013) “The Internet as infrastructure”. In William H. Dutton, ed. The Oxford handbook of information and communication technologies. Vol. 1, 86–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0005  

Schäffner, Christina (2004) “Metaphor and translation: some implications of a cognitive approach”. Journal of Pragmatics36, 7, Metaphor, 1253–1269. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.012  

Schlesinger, Arthur (1967) “Origins of the Cold War”. Foreign Affairs 46, 1, 22–52. 
https://doi.org/10.2307/20039280  

Semino, Elena (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.015

Simon, Felix M. and Chico Q. Camargo (2023) “Autopsy of a metaphor: the origins, use and blind spots of the ‘infodemic’”. New Media & Society 25, 8, 2219–2240. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211031908  

Simon, Herbert A. (1971) “Designing organizations for an information-rich world”. In Martin Greenberger, ed. Computers, communications, and the public interest, 37–72. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press. Available online at 
https://knowen-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/attachment/file/2005/DESIGNING%2BORGANIZATIONS%2Bfor%2BInformation-Rich%2Bworld%2B--%2BSImon.pdf (Accessed 08.09.2025). 

Smedinga, Marthe, Alan Cienki, and Henk W. de Regt (2023) “Metaphors as tools for understanding in science communication among experts and to the public”. Metaphor and the Social World 13, 2, 248–268. 
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.22016.sme  

Solberg, Hege, Gerd E. Nysether, and Aslak Steinsbekk (2012) “Patients’ experiences with metaphors in a solution-focused approach to improve self-management skills: a qualitative study”. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 40, 4, 398–401. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812449925  

Stubbs, Michael (1995) “Collocations and semantic profiles: on the cause of the trouble with quanti-tative studies”. Functions of Language 2, 1, 23–55. 
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.2.1.03stu

Sunstein, Cass R. (2001) Republic.com. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. 

Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman (1974) “Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases”. Science 185, 4157, 1124–1131. 
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124  

Wardle, Claire and Hossein Derakhshan (2017) Information disorder: toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe report DGI(2017)09. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available online at 
http://tverezo.info/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/PREMS-162317-GBR-2018-Report-desinformation-A4-BAT.pdf (Accessed 04.09.2022). 

Weaver, Stephen D. and Mark Gahegan (2007) “Constructing, visualizing, and analyzing a digital footprint”. Geographical Review 97, 3, 324–350. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2007.tb00509.x

 

Back to Issue