EAP - Trames Publications

PUBLISHED
SINCE 1997

TRAMES. A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

ISSN 1736-7514 (Electronic)
ISSN 1406-0922 (Print)

Impact Factor (2022): 0.2

TIME IN SPATIAL METALANGUAGE: THE AMBIGUOUS POSITION OF TIME IN CONCEPTS OF SOCIOCULTURAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL SPACE; pp. 394–410

PDF | DOI: 10.3176/tr.2010.4.07

Author

Tiit Remm

Abstract

In this paper I discuss the problematic presence of time in the spatial metalanguage of cultural and social research. General use of everyday spatial metaphors, as well as attempts to formalise spatial models, explicate the role of space as a modelling system. At the same time, the aspect of temporality is positionedinto an ambiguous role as being partly subordinated and rejected from these descriptive models with universalistic intentions. The problematic presence of time and temporality in the spatial metalanguage of cultural and social research is here discussed in the context of three theoretical models of space: Pitirim A. Sorokin’s sociocultural space, Pierre Bourdieu’s social space, and Juri Lotman’s cultural space. Relating to the history of theory through these three models, the discussion suggests a critical account on the ways temporality is presented in the spatial metalanguage. Nevertheless, in combination, these models suggest a possibility to involve multiple socioculturally specific accounts on time into coherent spatial models through the recognition of reflective activity of agents.

References

Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) Distinction: a social critique of the taste. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.

Bourdieu, Pierre (1985) “The social space and the genesis of groups”. Theory and Society 14, 6, 723–744.
doi:10.1007/BF00174048

Bourdieu, Pierre (1994) Raisons pratiques: sur la théorie de l'action. Paris: Seuil.

Chernov, Igor (1988) “Historical survey of Tartu-Moscow Semiotic School”. In Semiotics of culture. Proceedings of the 25th Symposium of the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics, Imatra, Finland, 27th-29th July, 1987, 7–16. Henri Broms and Rebecca Kaufmann, eds. Helsinki: Arator.

Greimas, Algirdas J. (1986) “For a topological semiotics”. In The city and the sign: an introduction to urban semiotics, 25–54. Mark Gottdiener and Alexandros Ph. Lagopoulos, eds. New York: Columbia University Press.

Keesing, Roger M. (1974) “Theories of culture”. Annual Review of Anthropology 3, 73–93.
doi:10.1146/annurev.an.03.100174.000445

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson (2003 [1980]) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lotman, Juri M. (1975 [1969]) “On the metalanguage of a typological description of culture”. Semiotica 14, 2, 97–123.
doi:10.1515/semi.1975.14.2.97

Lotman, Jurij M. (1979 [1973]) “The origin of plot in the light of typology”. Poetics Today 1, 1–2, 161–184.
doi:10.2307/1772046

Lotman, Juri (1984 [1977]) “The poetics of everyday behaviour in Russian eighteenth-century culture”. In The semiotics of Russian culture, 231–256. Ann Shukman, ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Lotman, Jurij M. (1986) “Ot redakcii (K probleme prostranstvennoj semiotiki).” Trudy po znakovym sistemam (Tartu) 19, 3–6.

Lotman, Jurij M. (1992 [1969]) “O metajazyke tipologičeskix opisanij kultury”. In Jurij M. Lotman, Izbrannye stati v trex tomax, 1. Stati po semiotike i tipologii kultury, 386–406. Tallinn: Aleksandra.

Lotman, Juri M. (2005 [1984]) “On the semiosphere”. Sign Systems Studies 33, 1, 205–229.

Nöth, Winfried (2006) “Yuri Lotman on metaphors and culture as self-referential semiospheres”. Semiotica 161, 1–4, 249–263.

Piaget, Jean (1946). Le développement de la notion de temps chez l'enfant. Paris: Presses univ. de France.

Porro, Pasquale ed. (2001) The medieval concept of time: studies on the scholastic debate and its reception in early modern philosophy. Leiden, Boston, and Köln: Brill.

Randviir, Anti (2007) “On spatiality in Tartu-Moscow cultural semiotics: the semiotic subject”. Sign Systems Studies 35, 1–2, 137–159.

Remm, Tiit (2009) “ ‘Alguse’ ja “lõpu” kui linna kirjeldamise vahendite kuulumisest linna juurde”. [‘The beginning’ and ‘the end’ as descriptive tools and aspects of city.] Acta Semiotica Estica 6, 86–105.

Sorokin, Pitirim A. (1959) Social and cultural mobility. Glencoe: Free Press.

Sorokin, Pitirim A. (1964 [1943]) Socio-cultural causality, space and time: a study of referential principles of sociology and social science. New York: Russel and Russel.

Sorokin, Pitirim A. (1992 [1941]) The crisis of our age. Oxford: Oneworld.

Sorokin, Pitirim A. (2002 [1954]) The ways and power of love: types, factors, and techniques of moral transformation. Philadelphia and London: Templeton Foundation Press.

Sorokin, Pitirim A. (2006 [1957]) Social and cultural dynamics: a study of change in major systems of art, truth, ethics, law, and social relationships. (Revised and abridged in one volume by the author.) New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.

Torop, Peeter (2005) “Semiosphere and/as the research object of semiotics of culture”. Sign Systems Studies 33, 1, 159–173.

Uspenskij, B. A., V. V. Ivanov, V. N. Toporov, A. M. Pjatigorskij, and J. M. Lotman (1998 [1973]) Theses on the semiotic study of cultures (as applied to the Slavic texts). Tezisy k cemiotičeskomu izučeniju kultur. Kultuurisemiootika teesid. (Tartu Semiotics Library, 1.) Tartu: University of Tartu.

Back to Issue