We introduce nanosatellite orbit control using a novel miniaturized cold gas propulsion module based on microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology. Firstly, the design and characteristics of the propulsion module suitable for CubeSat class nanosatellites are described. Secondly, mission analyses for in-orbit validation of the propulsion module on a 2-unit CubeSat in 300 km low Earth orbit are presented. The MEMS cold gas propulsion module with 10 cm ´ 10 cm ´ 3 cm dimensions and 220 g mass is specifically designed for use in CubeSats. In baseline configuration with a tank for 60 g of butane under 2 to 5 bar pressure, it can provide up to 15 m/s delta-V capability for a 2.66 kg satellite. The module includes four individually controllable thrusters with proportional thrust regulation and closed loop control; maximum thrust is 1 mN per thruster with 5 mN thrust resolution. The fully operational satellite with active orbital control is capable of accommodating a 0.64 kg and 10 cm ´ 10 cm ´ 7 cm additional payload. The analysed mission scenarios have potential for different Earth observation applications. Natural deorbiting, controlled orbit lowering, controlled orbit raising, and orbit keeping at 300 km altitude are simulated. Simulations indicate that the natural orbit lifetime can be extended from 63 days to 193 days with the baseline propulsion module and satellite altitude can be increased to 348 km or lowered to 257 km. Orbit keeping at 300 km is possible for up to 76 days; proportional thrust control could provide a further increase to 204 days.
1. Selva, D. and Krejci, D. A survey and assessment of the capabilities of Cubesats for Earth observation. Acta Astronaut., 2012, 74, 50–68.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.12.014
2. Woellert, K., Ehrenfreund, P., Ricco, A. J., and Hertzfeld, H. Cubesats: cost-effective science and technology platforms for emerging and developing nations. Adv. Space Res., 2011, 47(4), 663–684.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.10.009
3. Pajusalu, M., Ilbis, E., Ilves, T., Veske, M., Kalde, J., Lillmaa, H. et al. Design and pre-flight testing of the electrical power system for the ESTCube-1 nanosatellite. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci., 2014, 63(2S), 232–241.
4. Slavinskis, A., Kulu, E., Viru, J., Valner, R., Ehrpais, H., Uiboupin, T. et al. Attitude determination and control for centrifugal tether deployment on the ESTCube-1 nanosatellite. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci., 2014, 63(2S), 242–249.
5. Sarda, K., Eagleson, S., Caillibot, E., Grant, C., Kekez, D., Pranajaya, F., and Zee, R. E. Canadian advanced nanospace experiment 2: Scientific and technological innovation on a three-kilogram satellite. Acta Astronaut., 2006, 59, 236–245.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2006.02.054
6. Lappas, V., Adeli, N., Visagie, L., Fernandez, J., Theodorou, T., Steyn, W. et al. CubeSail: a low cost CubeSat based solar sail demonstration mission. Adv. Space Res., 2011, 48, 1890–1901.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.05.033
7. Gill, E., Sundaramoorthy, P., Bouwmeester, J., Zandbergen, B., and Reinhard, R. Formation flying within a constellation of nano-satellites: the QB50 mission. Acta Astronaut., 2013, 82(1), 110–117.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.04.029
8. Friis-Christensen, E., Luhr, H., and Hulot, G. Swarm: a constellation to study the Earth’s magnetic field. Earth Planets Space, 2006, 58(4), 351–358.
9. Gill, E., Maessen, D., Laan, E., Kraft, S., and Zheng, G. Atmospheric aerosol characterization with the Dutch–Chinese FAST formation flying mission. Acta Astronaut., 2010, 66(7–8), 1044–1051.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.09.021
10. Albertella, A., Migliaccio, F., and Sanso, F. GOCE: the Earth gravity field by space gradiometry. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr., 2002, 83(1–4), 1–15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020104624752
11. Lozano, P., Martınez-Sánchez, M., and Lopez-Urdiales, J. M. Electrospray emission from nonwetting flat dielectric surfaces. J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 2004, 276(2), 392–399.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.04.017
12. Patel, K. D., Bartsch, M. S., McCrink, M. H., Olsen, J. S., Mosier, B. P., and Crocker, R. W. Electrokinetic pumping of liquid propellants for small satellite microthruster applications. Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem., 2008, 132, 461–470.
13. Johnson, L., Whorton, M., Heaton, A., Pinson, R., Laue, G., and Adams, C. NanoSail-D: a solar sail demonstration mission. Acta Astronaut., 2011, 68, 571–575.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.02.008
14. Janhunen, P. Electrostatic plasma brake for deorbiting a satellite. J. Propul. Power, 2010, 26, 370–372.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.47537
15. Miller, D., Saenz-Otero, A., Wertz, J., Chen, A., Berkowski, G., Brodel, C. et al. SPHERES: a testbed for long duration satellite formation flying in micro-gravity conditions. In AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting. Clearwater, 2000, AAS 00-110.
16. Grönland, T., Rangsten, P., Nese, M., and Lang, M. Miniaturization of components and systems for space using MEMS-technology. Acta Astronaut., 2007, 61(1–6), 228–233.
17. Grm, A., Grönland, T., and Rodic, T. Numerical analysis of cold gas micro propulsion system for micro and nano satellites. Eng. Computation., 2011, 28(2), 184–195.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02644401111109222
18. Grönland, T., Johansson, H., Jonsson, K., Bejhed, J., and Rangsten, P. MEMS makes a difference in satellite propulsion. In Proceedings from the Small Satellite Systems and Services Conference. Portoroz, 2012.
19. Lätt, S., Slavinskis, A., Ilbis, E., Kvell, U., Voormansik, K., Kulu, E. et al. ESTCube-1 nanosatellite for electric solar wind sail in-orbit technology demonstration. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci., 2014, 63(2S), 200–209.
20. CubeSat Design Specification Rev. 12. The CubeSat Program, Cal Poly SLO. California, 2009.
21. Laizans, K., Sünter, I., Zalite, K., Kuuste, H., Valgur, M., Tarbe, K. et al. Design of the fault tolerant command and data handling subsystem for ESTCube-1. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci., 2014, 63(2S), 222–231.
22. Kuuste, H., Eenmäe, T., Allik, V., Agu, A., Vendt, R., Ansko, I. et al. Imaging system for nanosatellite proximity operations. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci., 2014, 63(2S), 250–257.
23. Wermuth, M., Hauschild, A., Montenbruck, O., and Kahle, R. TerraSAR-X precise orbit determination with real-time GPS ephemerides. Adv. Space Res., 2012, 50, 549–559.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.03.014
24. Chiaradia, A. P. M., Kuga, H. K., and Prado, A. F. B. A. Single frequency GPS measurements in real-time artificial satellite orbit determination. Acta Astronaut., 2003, 53, 123–133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(02)00198-4
25. D’Amico, S., Ardaens, J. S., and De Florio, S. Autonomous formation flying based on GPS – PRISMA flight results. Acta Astronaut., 2012, 82(1), 69–79.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.04.033
26. Hughes, S. P. General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT). NASA Technical Reports. Greenbelt, 2007.
27. Hughes, S. P. General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT) Mathematical Specifications. NASA Technical Reports. Greenbelt, 2012.
28. Hedin, A. E. Neutral Atmosphere Empirical Model from the surface to lower exosphere MSIS90. J. Geophys. Res., 1991, 96, 1159–1172.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/90JA02125
29. Nerem, R. S., Lerch, F. J., Marshall, J. A., Pavlis, E. C., Putney, B. H., Tapley, B. D. et al. Gravity model development for TOPEX/POSEIDON: Joint Gravity Models 1 and 2. J. Geophys. Res-Oceans., 1994, 99(C12), 24421–24447.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94JC01376
