, Imtiyaz B. Beleem , Ele Vahtmäe , Ants Kaasik , Tiit Kutser , Robert Szava-Kovats , Paresh Poriya , Bhavendra Chaudhary, Bhavik Vakani , Maniswara Raja S., Arun Kumar V., Piyush Vadher , Selva Bharath M., Sunandini Chopra, Ramkumaran K., Jarno Vanhatalo , Helen Orav-Kotta Remote sensing of intertidal seaweed habitats is challenged by overlapping spectral signals from multiple co-occurring species groups, making it difficult to predict their distributions. This study applies Hierarchical Modelling of Species Communities (HMSC), a joint species distribution framework that accounts for statistical dependencies and co-occurrence patterns among species groups, thereby improving prediction accuracy, particularly for groups that are otherwise difficult to model individually. We tested this approach using Sentinel-2 (S2) satellite imagery to estimate the coverage of green, brown, and red algae along the Veraval coast, Gujarat, India. To assess whether the findings could be reproduced beyond the original study area, we repeated the joint-versus-single-group comparison using a larger, spatially independent regional dataset from the Saurashtra and Gulf of Kachchh coasts of Gujarat. The HMSC framework effectively modelled the simultaneous distribution of green and red seaweeds based on their shared and individual responses to covariates derived from remote sensing data. Brown algae were weakly predicted at Veraval, where they were sparsely represented, and remained less predictable in the Saurashtra and Gulf of Kachchh dataset despite their higher occurrence and cover, suggesting limited spectral separability, within-group optical heterogeneity and mixed-pixel effects rather than insufficient representation alone. Still, the results show that this method is a promising tool for monitoring complex shallow coastal habitats at local scales and may support ecosystem assessment and management when applied within its demonstrated domain.
Aps, R., Herkül, K., Kotta, J., Cormier, R., Kostamo, K., Laamanen, L. et al. 2018. Marine environmental vulnerability and cumulative risk profiles to support ecosystem-based adaptive maritime spatial planning. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 75, 2488–2500.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy101
Araújo, M. B. and Peterson, A. T. 2012. Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling. Ecology, 93, 1527–1539.
https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1930.1
Asner, G. P. and Martin, R. E. 2009. Airborne spectranomics: mapping canopy chemical and taxonomic diversity in tropical forests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 269–276.
https://doi.org/10.1890/070152
Barbier, E. B., Hacker, S. D., Kennedy, C., Koch, E. W., Stier, A. C. and Silliman, B. R. 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs, 81, 169–193.
https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1510.1
Beleem, I., Poriya, P. and Gohil, B. 2019. An annotated checklist of marine brachyuran crabs of Gujarat waters, India. Iranian Journal of Animal Biosystematics,15, 9–46.
https://doi.org/10.22067/ijab.v15i1.66163
Bhavana, D., Tej, A. R., Swaroop, G. J., Mojjada, R. K., Pokkathappada, A. A., Mojjada, S. K. et al. 2025. A novel seaweed detection image processing and validation framework: a pragmatic study on natural seaweed beds along the north-west coast of India. Science of the Total Environment, 978, 179296.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179296
Černá, L. and Chytrý, M. 2005. Supervised classification of plant communities with artificial neural networks. Journal of Vegetation Science, 16, 407–414.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.16541103.2005.tb02380.x
Chao Rodríguez, Y., Domínguez Gómez, J. A., Sánchez-Carnero, N. and Rodríguez-Pérez, D. 2017. A comparison of spectral macroalgae taxa separability methods using an extensive spectral library. Algal Research, 26, 463–473.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.04.021
Chen, P., Nelson, J. and Tourneret, J. Y. 2017. Towards a sparse Bayesian Markov random field approach to hyperspectral unmixing and classification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 26, 426–438.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2016.2622401
Cho, H. J., Kirui, P. and Natarajan, H. 2008. Test of multi-spectral vegetation index for floating and canopy-forming submerged vegetation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 5, 477–483.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph5050477
Cho, H. J., Mishra, D. and Wood, J. 2012. Remote sensing of submerged aquatic vegetation. In Remote Sensing – Applications (Escalante-Ramírez, B., ed.). IntechOpen, Rijeka, 297‒308.
https://doi.org/10.5772/35156
Cho, M. A., Skidmore, A., Corsi, F., van Wieren, S. E. and Sobhan, I. 2007. Estimation of green grass/herb biomass from airborne hyperspectral imagery using spectral indices and partial least squares regression. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 9, 414–424.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2007.02.001
D’Souza, S. L., Bhat, H. G. and Shenoy, K. B. 2022. Study of intertidal molluscan diversity of the Dakshina Kannada coast, India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Current Science, 122, 1426‒1440.
https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v122/i12/1426-1440
Féret, J. and Asner, G. P. 2014. Mapping tropical forest canopy diversity using high-fidelity imaging spectroscopy. Ecological Applications, 24, 1289–1296.
https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1824.1
Filippi, A. M. and Jensen, J. R. 2006. Fuzzy learning vector quantization for hyperspectral coastal vegetation classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 100, 512–530.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.11.007
Geevan, C. P. and Dixit, A. M. 2012. State of environment report on coastal and marine environment Gujarat State. Gujarat Ecology Commission, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar; in association with Centre for Environment & Social Concerns, Ahmedabad.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1295.3205
Hedley, J. D. and Mumby, P. J. 2002. Biological and remote sensing perspectives of pigmentation in coral reef organisms. Advances in Marine Biology, 43, 277‒317.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2881(02)43006-4
Hedley, J. D., Roelfsema, C. M., Phinn, S. R. and Mumby, P. J. 2012. Environmental and sensor limitations in optical remote sensing of coral reefs: implications for monitoring and sensor design. Remote Sensing, 4, 271–302.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4010271
Iriyama, K. and Yoshiura, M. 1977. Absorption spectroscopy of chlorophylls a and b in methanol, dioxane, and/or water. Colloid and Polymer Science, 255, 133–139.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01777272
Jetz, W., McPherson, J. M. and Guralnick, R. P. 2012. Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 151–159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.007
Jha, B., Reddy, C. R. K., Thakur, M. C. and Rao, M. U. 2009. Seaweeds of India: The Diversity and Distribution of Seaweeds of Gujarat Coast. Springer, Dordrecht.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2488-6
Kerry, R. G., Montalbo, F. J. P., Das, R., Patra, S., Mahapatra, G. P., Maurya, G. K. et al. 2022. An overview of remote monitoring methods in biodiversity conservation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 80179–80221.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23242-y
Keshava, N., Kerekes, J. P., Manolakis, D. G. and Shaw, G. A. 2000. Algorithm taxonomy for hyperspectral unmixing. In Algorithms for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery VI (Shen, S. S. and Descour, M. R., eds). Proceedings of SPIE, 4049, 42–63.
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.410362
Kirk, J. T. O. 1994. Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623370
Klemas, V. 2013. Remote sensing of emergent and submerged wetlands: an overview. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34, 6286–6320.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2013.800656
Knipling, E. B. 1970. Physical and physiological basis for the reflectance of visible and near-infrared radiation from vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1, 155–159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(70)80021-9
Kotta, J., Kutser, T., Teeveer, K., Vahtmäe, E. and Pärnoja, M. 2013. Predicting species cover of marine macrophyte and invertebrate species combining hyperspectral remote sensing, machine learning and regression techniques. PLoS ONE, 8, e63946.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063946
Kotta, J., Remm, K., Vahtmäe, E., Kutser, T. and Orav-Kotta, H. 2014. In-air spectral signatures of the Baltic Sea macrophytes and their statistical separability. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 8, 083634.
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.8.083634
Kotta, J., Orav-Kotta, H., Jänes, H., Hummel, H., Arvanitidis, C., van Avesaath, P. et al. 2017. Essence of the patterns of cover and richness of intertidal hard bottom communities: a pan-European study. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 97, 525–538.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315416001351
Kutser, T., Dekker, A. G. and Skirving, W. 2003. Modelling spectral discrimination of Great Barrier Reef benthic communities by remote sensing instruments. Limnology and Oceanography, 48, 497–510.
https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2003.48.1_part_2.0497
Kutser, T., Miller, I. and Jupp, D. L. B. 2006. Mapping coral reef benthic substrates using hyperspectral space-borne images and spectral libraries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 70, 449–460.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.06.026
Kutser, T., Hedley, J., Giardino, C., Roelfsema, C. and Brando, V. E. 2020. Remote sensing of shallow waters – a 50 year retrospective and future directions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 240, 111619.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111619
Maes, J., Egoh, B., Willemen, L., Liquete, C., Vihervaara, P., Schägner, J. P. et al. 2012. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 1, 31‒39.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004
Mahapatra, M., Ramakrishnan, R. and Rajawat, A. S. 2015. Coastal vulnerability assessment of Gujarat coast to sea level rise using GIS techniques: a preliminary study. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 19, 241–256.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-015-0384-x
McFeeters, S. K. 1996. The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17, 1425–1432.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169608948714
Menge, B. A. and Sutherland, J. P. 1987. Community regulation: variation in disturbance, competition, and predation in relation to environmental stress and recruitment. American Naturalist, 130, 730–757.
https://doi.org/10.1086/284741
Meyer, E. L., Matzke, N. J. and Williams, S. J. 2015. Remote sensing of intertidal habitats predicts West Indian topsnail population expansion but reveals scale-dependent bias. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 19, 107–118.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-014-0371-7
Nayak, S. and Bahuguna, A. 2001. Application of remote sensing data to monitor mangroves and other coastal vegetation of India. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 30, 195–213.
Norberg, A., Abrego, N., Blanchet, F. G., Adler, F. R., Anderson, B. J., Anttila, J. et al. 2019. A comprehensive evaluation of predictive performance of 33 species distribution models at species and community levels. Ecological Monographs, 89, e01370.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1370
O’Neill, J. D., Costa, M. and Sharma, T. 2011. Remote sensing of shallow coastal benthic substrates: in situ spectra and mapping of eelgrass (Zostera marina) in the Gulf Islands National Park Reserve of Canada. Remote Sensing, 3, 975–1005.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3050975
Ovaskainen, O., Tikhonov, G., Norberg, A., Blanchet, F. G., Duan, L., Dunson, D. et al. 2017. How to make more out of community data? A conceptual framework and its implementation as models and software. Ecology Letters, 20, 561–576.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12757
Pham, T. D., Xia, J., Ha, N. T., Bui, D. T., Le, N. N. and Tekeuchi, W. 2019. A review of remote sensing approaches for monitoring blue carbon ecosystems: mangroves, seagrasses and salt marshes during 2010–2018. Sensors, 19, 1933.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s19081933
Pollock, L. J., Tingley, R., Morris, W. K., Golding, N., O’Hara, R. B., Parris, K. M. et al. 2014. Understanding co-occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a joint species distribution model (JSDM). Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 397–406.
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12180
Poriya, P. 2015. Ecological status of the intertidal macrofaunal assemblages in a rocky intertidal coast. PhD thesis. Saurashtra University, Rajkot, India.
Poriya, P., Vakani, B. and Kundu, R. 2014. New record of live coral species colonizing intertidal zones along South Saurashtra coastline. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 111, 98‒105.
https://doi.org/10.17087/jbnhs/2014/v111i2/71742
Portugal, A. B., Carvalho, F. L., Carneiro, P. B. M., Rossi, S. and Soares, M. O. 2016. Increased anthropogenic pressure decreases species richness in tropical intertidal reefs. Marine Environmental Research, 120, 44–54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.07.005
Rahman, A. U., Tikhonov, G., Oksanen, J., Rossi, T. and Ovaskainen, O. 2024. Accelerating joint species distribution modelling with Hmsc-HPC by GPU porting. PLoS Computational Biology, 20, e1011914.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011914
Rouse, J. W., Jr., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A. and Deering, D. W. 1974. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium, 1, 309–317. NASA Special Publication SP-351, Washington, D.C.
Saluri, M., Kaldmäe, M. and Tuvikene, R. 2019. Extraction and quantification of phycobiliproteins from the red alga Furcellaria lumbricalis. Algal Research, 37, 115–123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2018.11.013
Schenone, S. and Thrush, S. F. 2020. Unraveling ecosystem functioning in intertidal soft sediments: the role of density-driven interactions. Scientific Reports, 10, 11909.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68869-4
Seidel, V., Dourte, D. and Diamond, C. 2019. Applying spatial mapping of remotely sensed data to valuation of coastal ecosystem services in the Gulf of Mexico. Water, 11, 1179.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061179
Tikhonov, G., Opedal, Ø. H., Abrego, N., Lehikoinen, A., de Jonge, M. M. J., Oksanen, J. et al. 2020. Joint species distribution modelling with the R-package Hmsc. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 442–447.
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13345
Vahtmäe, E. and Kutser, T. 2013. Classifying the Baltic Sea shallow water habitats using image-based and spectral library methods. Remote Sensing, 5, 2451‒2474.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5052451
Vahtmäe, E., Kutser, T. and Paavel, B. 2020. Performance and applicability of water column correction models in optically complex coastal waters. Remote Sensing, 12, 1861.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111861
Vahtmäe, E., Argus, L., Toming, K., Ligi, M. and Kutser, T. 2025. Hyperspectral library of submerged aquatic vegetation and benthic substrates in the Baltic Sea. Earth System Science Data, 17, 1685–1692.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1685-2025
Villa, P., Bresciani, M., Braga, F. and Bolpagni, R. 2014. Comparative assessment of broadband vegetation indices over aquatic vegetation. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7, 3117–3127.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2315718
Warton, D. I., Blanchet, F. G., O’Hara, R. B., Ovaskainen, O., Taskinen, S., Walker, S. C. et al. 2015. So many variables: joint modeling in community ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30, 766–779.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.007
Wei, J. and Wang, X. 2020. An overview on linear unmixing of hyperspectral data. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 3735403.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3735403
Wu, H. and Li, Z.-L. 2009. Scale issues in remote sensing: a review on analysis, processing and modeling. Sensors, 9, 1768–1793.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s90301768
Xu, M., Watanachaturaporn, P., Varshney, P. K. and Arora, M. K. 2005. Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 97, 322–336.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.008
Yu, W. and Ma, M. 2015. Scale mismatch between in situ and remote sensing observations of land surface temperature: implications for the validation of remote sensing LST products. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12, 497‒501.
https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2014.2347953
