, Andrei Blinov , Dmitri Vinnikov he decarbonization of the European Union energy sector is associated with large-scale integration of renewable energy sources (RES) and a transition toward decentralized electricity supply architectures. While residential energy storage systems (ESS) based on electrochemical batteries enable short-term balancing of renewable generation, their limited energy capacity and high cost make them unsuitable for seasonal energy storage, leading to significant curtailment of renewable energy production. Hydrogen-based energy storage is considered a promising alternative due to its high specific energy capacity and suitability for long-term storage, despite low round-trip electrical efficiency and infrastructural challenges. This paper evaluates the feasibility of hydrogen technologies for electrical energy storage in RES-based residential power systems in Estonia. The analysis is based on a real Estonian household dataset and considers metrics such as near-zero energy consumption, grid-support capability, and RES energy utilization. A comparative assessment of daily and seasonal ESS configur ations together with a techno-economic comparison of battery and hydrogen-based storage systems is performed. Special attention is given to the utilization of waste heat generated during hydrogen-to-electricity conversion for residential heating, which is identified as a key condition for achieving economic feasibility and improving overall system efficiency.
1. Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’).
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1119/oj (accessed 2026-02-02).
2. European Commission. Fit for 55: delivering on the proposals.
https://commission.europa.eu/topics/climate-action/delivering-european-green-deal/fit-55-delivering-proposals_en (accessed 2026-02-02).
3. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast).
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/2001/oj (accessed 2026-02-02).
4. Mehrjerdi, H., Iqbal, A., Rakhshani, E. and Rueda Torres, J. Daily-seasonal operation in net-zero energy building powered by hybrid renewable energies and hydrogen storage systems. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 201, 112156.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112156
5. Fokkema, J. E., uit het Broek, M. A. J., Schrotenboer, A. H., Land, M. J. and Van Foreest, N. D. Seasonal hydrogen storage decisions under constrained electricity distribution capacity. Renewable Energy, 2022, 195, 76–91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.170
6. Yang, C., Liu, J., Liao, H., Liang, G. and Zhao, J. An improved carbon emission flow method for the power grid with prosumers. Energy Reports, 2023, 9, 114–121.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.165
7. Shaukat, N., Islam, M. R., Rahman, M. M., Khan, B., Ullah, B., Ali, S. M. et al. Decentralized, democratized and decarbonized future electric power distribution grids: a survey on the paradigm shift from the conventional power system to micro grid structures. IEEE Access, 2023, 11, 60957–60987.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3284031
8. Jaysawal, R. K., Chakraborty, S., Elangovan, D. and Padmanaban, S. Concept of net zero energy buildings (NZEB) – a literature review. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 2022, 11, 100582.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100582
9. Wu, W. and Skye, H. M. Residential net-zero energy buildings: review and perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 142, 110859.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110859
10. Jack, M. W. and Konings, H. B. Seasonal variation in electricity demand of solar-powered net-zero energy housing in temperate climates. Energy and Buildings, 2024, 303, 113826.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113826
11. Chen, Q., Kuang, Z., Liu, X. and Zhang, T. Energy storage to solve the diurnal, weekly, and seasonal mismatch and achieve zero-carbon electricity consumption in buildings. Applied Energy, 2022, 312, 118744.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118744
12. Zerrahn, A. and Schill, W.-P. Long-run power storage requirements for high shares of renewables: review and a new model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 79, 1518–1534.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.098
13. Yang, T., Liu, W., Kramer, G. J. and Sun, Q. Seasonal thermal energy storage: a techno-economic literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 139, 110732.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110732
14. Liu, X., Zu, L., Wei, Z., Wang, Y., Pan, Z., Xiao, G. et al. Two-layer optimal scheduling of integrated electric-hydrogen energy system with seasonal energy storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 82, 1131–1145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.07.415
15. Liu, J., Hu, H., Yu, S. S. and Trinh, H. Virtual power plant with renewable energy sources and energy storage systems for sustainable power grid-formation, control techniques and demand response. Energies, 2023, 16(9), 3705.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093705
16. Li, Y., Zhang, X., Gao, W., Xu, W. and Wang, Z. Operational performance and grid-support assessment of distributed flexibility practices among residential prosumers under high PV penetration. Energy, 2022, 238(Part B), 121824.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121824
17. Zuo, Z., Basem, A., Hussein, Z. A., Sharma, K., Dixit, S., Alanazi, Y. M. et al. Enhanced near zero-energy building performance through intelligent hydrogen storage management across diverse climates. Energy, 2025, 327, 136339.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136339
18. Hasan, S., Blinov, A., Chub, A. and Vinnikov, D. PV generation and consumption dataset of an Estonian residential dwelling. 2024.
https://data.taltech.ee/records/6hayh-x0h25 (accessed 2026-02-02).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04747-w
19. Clark, K. Camille Bauer LINAX PQ1000 power quality assurance now available in small format.
https://www.ravepubs.com/camille-bauer-linax-pq1000-power-quality-assurance-now-available-in-small-format/ (accessed 2026-02-02).
20. Gour, R. and Verma, V. Comparative performance of DVR and STATCOM for voltage regulation in radial microgrid with high penetration of RES. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Systems, 2022, 13, 831–837.
https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/414846
https://doi.org/10.32985/ijeces.13.9.12
21. Liu, Y., Yuen, C., Huang, S., Ul Hassan, N., Wang, X. and Xie, S. Peak-to-average ratio constrained demand-side management with consumer’s preference in residential smart grid. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2014, 8(6), 1084–1097.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2014.2332301
22. Abaravicius, J., Sernhed, K. and Pyrko, J. More or less about data: analyzing load demand in residential houses. ACEEE Summer Study Proceedings, 2006.
https://www.aceee.org/files/proceedings/2006/data/papers/SS06_Panel12_Paper01.pdf
23. Europe Solarstore.
https://www.europe-solarstore.com/ (accessed 2026-02-02).
24. Hassan, I. A., Ramadan, H. S., Saleh, M. A. and Hissel, D. Hydrogen storage technologies for stationary and mobile applications: review, analysis and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 149, 111311.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111311
25. Moran, C., Deane, P., Yousefian, S. and Monaghan, R. F. D. The hydrogen storage challenge: does storage method and size affect the cost and operational flexibility of hydrogen supply chains? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 52(Part A), 1090–1100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.269
26. Pei, P., Yuan, X., Gou, J. and Li, P. Dynamic response during PEM fuel cell loading-up. Materials, 2009, 2(3), 734–748.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma2030734
27. Bhattacharyya, D. and Rengaswamy, R. A review of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) dynamic models. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(13), 6068–6086.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801664j
28. Ellamla, H. R., Staffell, I., Bujlo, P., Pollet, B. G. and Pasupathi, S. Current status of fuel cell based combined heat and power systems for residential sector. Journal of Power Sources, 2015, 293, 312–328.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.050
29. Bampaou, M. and Panopoulos, K. D. A comprehensive overview of technologies applied in hydrogen valleys. Energies, 2024, 17(24), 6464.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246464
30. de Bruijn, F. A. and Janssen, G. J. M. PEM fuel cell materials: costs, performance and durability. In Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Production (Lipman, T. and Weber, A., eds). Springer, New York, 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7789-5_152
31. DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record. Energy requirements for hydrogen gas compression and liquefaction as related to vehicle storage needs.
https://hydrogen.energy.gov/docs/hydrogenprogramlibraries/pdfs/9013_energy_requirements_for_hydrogen_gas_compression.pdf (accessed 2026-02-02).
32. Fujiwara, H., Ono, H., Onoue, K. and Nishimura, S. High-pressure gaseous hydrogen permeation test method – property of polymeric materials for high-pressure hydrogen devices (1). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(53), 29082–29094.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.215
33. Dimitriou, T., Skandalos, N. and Karamanis, D. Progress in improving photovoltaics longevity. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(22), 10373.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210373
34. International Energy Agency. Global hydrogen review: assumptions annex.
https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/2ceb17b8-474f-4154-aab5-4d898f735c17/IEAGHRassumptions_final.pdf (accessed 2026-02-02).
35. Niepelt, R., Schlemminger, M., Bredemeier, D., Peterssen, F., Lohr, C., Bensmann, A. et al. The influence of falling costs for electrolyzers on the location factors for green hydrogen production. Solar RRL, 2023, 7(17), 2300317.
https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202300317.
36. Li, L., Aravind, P. V., Boldrini, A. and van den Broek, M. Techno-economic assessment of off-grid hydrogen supply from distant solar or wind sources to steelmaking. Applied Energy, 2025, 391, 125947.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125947
37. European Energy Research Alliance. Key performance indicators (KPIs) for FCH research and innovation, 2020–2030.
https://www.eera-fch.eu/component/attachments/?id=429&task=download&utm_source (accessed 2026-02-02).
38. Youinou, G., Dufek, E. and Hansen, J. Resource adequacy and capital cost considerations pertaining to large electric grids powered by wind, solar, storage, gas and nuclear. Energies, 2025, 18(10), 2563.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18102563
39. Shin, H. K. and Ha, S. K. A review on the cost analysis of hydrogen gas storage tanks for fuel cell vehicles. Energies, 2023, 16(13), 5233.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16135233
40. Talukdar, M., Blum, P., Heinemann, N. and Miocic, J. Techno-economic analysis of underground hydrogen storage in Europe. iScience, 2024, 27(1), 108771.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.108771
41. Cleantechnica. Hydrogen electrolysis cost projections from major organizations low by 60% to 300%.
https://cleantechnica.com/2025/02/24/hydrogen-electrolysis-cost-projections-from-major-organizations-low-by-60-to-300/ (accessed 2026-02-02).
42. Brattle. Emerging economics of hydrogen production and delivery.
https://www.brattle.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Emerging-Economics-of-Hydrogen-Production-and-Delivery_2024-1.pdf (accessed 2026-02-02).
43. The Transition Accelerator. The techno-economics of hydrogen compression. Technical brief.
https://transitionaccelerator.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/TA-Technical-Brief-1.1_TEEA-Hydrogen-Compression_PUBLISHED.pdf (accessed 2026-02-02).
44. Market Growth Reports. Fuel cell power generation systems market overview.
https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/market-reports/fuel-cell-power-generation-systems-market-100106 (accessed 2026-02-02).
