ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1952
 
Proceeding cover
proceedings
of the estonian academy of sciences
ISSN 1736-7530 (Electronic)
ISSN 1736-6046 (Print)
Impact Factor (2024): 0.7

Research article
Digitalisation as a driver of psychosocial risks in post-pandemic workplaces with implications for psychosocial risk management; pp. 237–243
PDF | https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2026.3.08

Author
Mari-Liis Ivask ORCID Icon
Abstract

Digitalisation has become a defining feature of post-pandemic work, reshaping work organisation and creating psychosocial risk (PSR) patterns that are not always captured in established assessment frameworks. This qualitative study examines how digitalisation, including remote/hybrid work and the growing role of advanced systems, amplifies traditional PSRs and generates emerging risks, using Estonia as an information-rich case. Twelve semi- structured interviews were conducted with occupational health experts, including occupational psychologists and occupational health physicians, between November and December 2025. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis.

Based on this Estonian expert sample, the analysis identified five interrelated PSR themes in post-pandemic digitalised workplaces: (1) work demands and workload, (2) organisational culture and change management, (3) social relations and isolation, (4) work‒life boundaries and availability, and (5) career insecurity and individual adaptation. Experts highlighted an increased cognitive load and ‘double work’ caused by poorly integrated systems and the need to check digital and AI-generated outputs. They also described uncertainty and limited involvement in change processes, loneliness and misunderstandings in digital communication, constant availability that reduces recovery, ongoing skills pressure, and perceived monitoring. Across themes, digitalisation functioned as a cross-cutting driver spanning widely used Cox’s PSR domains. The findings underline the need to make digitalisation explicit in PSR assessment and management by integrating technology-mediated exposure pathways into routine procedures and controls. This is important for designing effective workplace interventions, supporting employee well-being and resilience, and strengthening sustainable management practices ‒ so that digital transformation contributes not only to efficiency and innovation but also to healthier and more sustainable work environments.

References

Ayyagari, R., Grover, V. and Purvis, R. 2011. Technostress: tech­nological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831–858. 
https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963

Baek, S.-U., Yoon, J.-H. and Won, J.-U. 2022. Association between workers’ anxiety over technological automation and sleep disturbance: results from a nationally representative survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 10051. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610051

Barber, L. K. and Santuzzi, A. M. 2015. Please respond ASAP: workplace telepressure and employee recovery. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(2), 172–189. 
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038278

Blasco, S., Rochut, J. and Rouland, B. 2022. Displaced or depressed? The effect of working in automatable jobs on mental health (IZA discussion paper No. 15434)
https://docs.iza.org/dp15434.pdf (accessed 2026-01-19).

Boot, C. R. L., Lamontagne, A. D. and Madsen, I. E. H. 2024. Fifty years of research on psychosocial working conditions and health: from promise to practice. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 50(6), 395–405. 
https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4180

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brod, C. 1984. Technostress: The Human Cost of the Computer Revolution. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

Chafi, M. B., Hultberg, A. and Yams, N. B. 2022. Post-pandemic office work: perceived challenges and opportunities for a sustainable work environment. Sustainability, 14, 294. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010294

Chesley, N. 2014. Information and communication technology use, work intensification and employee strain and distress. Work, Employment and Society, 28(4), 589–610. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013500112

Chuang, Y.-T., Chiang, H.-L. and Lin, A.-P. 2025. Insights from the job demands–resources model: AI’s dual impact on employees’ work and life well-being. International Journal of Information Management, 83, 102887. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102887

Cox, T. 1993. Stress research and stress management: putting theory to work (Contract research report No. 61/1993). HSE Books.

Day, A., Paquet, S., Scott, N. and Hambley, L. 2012. Perceived information and communication technology (ICT) demands on employee outcomes: the moderating effect of organizational ICT support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(4), 473–491. 
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029837

EU-OSHA. 2000. Report ‒ research on work-related stress
https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/report-research-work-related-stress (accessed 2026-01-19).

European Commission. 2024. Estonia 2024 digital decade country report
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/factpages/estonia-2024-digital-decade-country-report (accessed 2026-01-19).

Gajendran, R. S. and Harrison, D. A. 2007. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psycho­logical mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. 
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524

ILO (International Labour Organization). 2016. Workplace stress: a collective challenge
https://www.ilo.org/publications/workplace-stress-collective-challenge (accessed 2026-01-19).

Jain, A., Hassard, J., Leka, S., Di Tecco, C. and Iavicoli, S. 2021. The role of occupational health services in psychosocial risk management and the promotion of mental health and well-being at work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7), 3632. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073632

Kim, B.-J., Kim, M.-J. and Lee, J. 2025. The dark side of artificial intelligence adoption: linking artificial intelligence adoption to employee depression via psychological safety and ethical leadership. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 704. 
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05040-2

Kumar, P. S. 2024. Technostress: a comprehensive literature review on dimensions, impacts, and management strategies. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 16, 100475. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100475

Leka, S. and Cox, T. 2008. The European framework for psychosocial risk management: PRIMA-EF. Institute of Work, Health and Organisations, University of Nottingham. 
http://www.prima-ef.org/uploads/1/1/0/2/11022736/prima-ef_ebook.pdf (accessed 2026-04-06).

Leka, S. and Jain, A. 2024. Conceptualising work-related psychosocial risks: current state of the art and implications for research, policy and practice (Report 2024.09)European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), Brussels. 
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5114626

Leka, S., Jain, A. and World Health Organization. 2010. Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: an overview
https://iris.who.int/items/32806e00-e5b0-40f7-939c-43bdcd912dea (accessed 2026-01-19).

Leka, S., Jain, A., Cox, T. and Kortum, E. 2011. The development of the European framework for psychosocial risk management: PRIMA-EF. Journal of Occupational Health, 53(2), 137–143. 
https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.O10010

Lițan, D. E. 2025. Mental health in the “era” of artificial intelligence: technostress and the perceived impact on anxiety and depressive disorders ‒ an SEM analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1600013.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1600013

Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S. and Tu, Q. 2008. The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: conceptual development and validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. 
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165

Salanova, M., Llorens, S. and Cifre, E. 2013. The dark side of technologies: technostress among users of information and communication technologies. International Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 422–436. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.680460

Schabracq, M. J. and Cooper, C. L. 2000. The changing nature of work and stress. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(3), 227–241. 
https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940010320589

Stadin, M., Nordin, M., Broström, A., Magnusson Hanson, L. L., Westerlund, H. and Fransson, E. I. 2016. Information and communication technology demands at work: the association with job strain, effort-reward imbalance and self-rated health in different socio-economic strata. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 89(7), 1049–1058. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-016-1140-8

Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S. and Ragu-Nathan, T. S. 2007. The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. 
https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109

Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B. and Ragu-Nathan, T. S. 2015. Techno­stress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103–132. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042

Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L. and Stich, J. F. 2019. The technostress trifecta ‒ techno eustress, techno distress and design: theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 6–42. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12169

Tedone, A. M. 2022. Keeping up with work email after hours and employee wellbeing: examining relationships during and prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Occupational Health Science, 6(1), 51–72. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-021-00107-3

Wang, K., Shu, Q. and Tu, Q. 2008. Technostress under different organizational environments: an empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 3002–3013. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.007

WHO (World Health Organization). 2003. Work organization and stress: systematic problem approaches for employers, managers and trade union representatives. 
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241590475 (accessed 2026-01-19).

Wright, K. B., Abendschein, B., Wombacher, K., O’Connor, M., Hoffman, M., Dempsey, M. et al. 2014. Work-related communication technology use outside of regular work hours and work–life conflict: the influence of communication technologies on perceived work–life conflict, burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 507–530. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914533332

Xu, G., Zheng, Z., Zhang, J., Sun, T. and Liu, G. 2025. Does digitalization benefit employees? A systematic meta-analysis of the digital technology–employee nexus in the workplace. Systems, 13(6), 409. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13060409

Back to Issue

Choose new content alerts