ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1952
 
Proceeding cover
proceedings
of the estonian academy of sciences
ISSN 1736-7530 (Electronic)
ISSN 1736-6046 (Print)
Impact Factor (2024): 0.7

Research article
How does sustainable human resource management contribute to managerial well-being?; pp. 201–207
PDF | https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2026.3.03

Authors
Maris Zernand-Vilson ORCID Icon, Karin Reinhold ORCID Icon, Ave Karu
Abstract

This study examines how sustainable human resource management (HRM) contributes to managerial well-being in the Estonian public sector, addressing the gap that HRM–well-being research remains largely employee-centric and provides limited insight into managers’ well-being under high demands. Using a mixed-method design, we combined a 2023 survey of 120 public-sector managers across four sectors (internal security, education, health care, and social services) with 11 semi-structured interviews conducted in 2024–2025. The framework integrates sustainable HRM with the job demands-resources (JD-R) model, psychosocial safety climate (PSC) model, and the dynamics of well-being perspective, capturing both hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Results indicate substantial job demands (sustained concentration, time pressure, emotional demands, and overtime-related fatigue), yet relatively low stress symptoms and no gender differences in demand ratings. High demands were bal - anced by resources, corresponding with generally good mental well-being. Interviews showed that stress was pervasive but manageable through deliberate recovery practices and meaning-making tied to societal impact and accomplishment, underscoring the role of eudaimonic well- being, while hedonic restoration was mainly supported through off-job recovery. Overall, the findings suggest that sustainable HRM supports managerial well-being by strengthening job and organizational resources and fostering a psychosocially safer climate that legitimizes participation, support, and recovery, enabling sustainable performance under persistent demands.

References

Bai, B. 2025. Exploring sustainable HRM through the lens of employee wellbeing. Sustainability17(12), 5646. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125646

Bakker, A. B. and Demerouti, E. 2014. Job demands–resources theory. In Work and Wellbeing (Chen, P. Y. and Cooper, C. L., eds). Wiley Blackwell, Chichester, 37–64. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell019

Biron, C., Parent-Lamarche, A., Ivers, H. and Baril-Gingras, G. 2018. Do as you say: the effects of psychosocial safety climate on managerial quality in an organizational health intervention. International Journal of Workplace Health Management11(4), 228–244. 
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-01-2018-0009

Boureston, M. N. 2019. Managerial sensemaking and sensegiving: understanding middle managers’ perspectives at a government institute. PhD thesis. Northeastern University, USA.

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F. and Schaufeli, W. B. 2001. The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology86(3), 499–512. 
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

Dollard, M. and McTernan, W. 2011. Psychosocial safety climate: a multilevel theory of work stress in the health and community service sector. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences20, 287–293. 
https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796011000588

Ehnert, I. 2009. Sustainable Human Resource Management. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2188-8

Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M. and Müller-Camen, M. 2016. Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world’s largest companies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management27(1), 88–108. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157

Galy, E. 2020. A multidimensional scale of mental workload evaluation based on individual-workload-activity (IWA) model: validation and relationships with job satisfaction. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology16(3), 240–252. 
https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.16.3.p240

Heller, A. S., van Reekum, C. M., Schaefer, S. M., Lapate, R. C., Radler, B. T., Ryff, C. D. et al. 2013. Sustained striatal activity predicts eudaimonic well-being and cortisol output. Psychological Science24(11), 2191–2200. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613490744

Jackson, L. and Rothmann, S. 2005. Work-related well-being of educators in a district of the North-West Province. Perspectives in Education23, 107–122. 
https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC87328

Ji, T., Loh, M. Y., De Jonge, J., Peeters, M. C. W., Taris, T. W. and Dollard, M. F. 2025. “Are you feeling safe?”: an investigation of psychosocial safety climate in the relations of job characteristics and employee exhaustion and engagement. Industrial Health63(1), 3–13. 
https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2024-0027

Kane, C. 2022. The future workplace: reimagining the office for the twenty-first century. In European Cities After COVID-19 (Just, T. and Plößl, F., eds). Springer, Cham, 179–195. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89788-8_16

Karasek, R. A. 1979. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly24(2), 285–308. 
https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498

Kelloway, E. K. and Barling, J. 2010. Leadership development as an intervention in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress24(3), 260–279. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.518441

Kramar, R. 2014. Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach? The International Journal of Human Resource Management25(8), 1069–1089. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.816863

Mirza, M. Z., Isha, A. S. N., Memon, M. A., Azeem, S. and Zahid, M. 2022. Psychosocial safety climate, safety compliance and safety participation: the mediating role of psychological distress. Journal of Management & Organization28(2), 363–378. 
https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.35

Qamar, F., Afshan, G. and Rana, S. A. 2024. Sustainable HRM and well-being: systematic review and future research agenda. Management Review Quarterly74, 2289–2339. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00360-6

Sonnentag, S. 2015. Dynamics of well-being. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior2, 261–293. 
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111347

Spaner, J., Klier, J., Dillon, R. and Murray, E. 2025. Character is key: leadership excellence in the public sector. McKinsey & Company. 
https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/character-is-key-leadership-excellence-in-the-public-sector (accessed 2026-01-15).

Van De Voorde, K., Paauwe, J. and Van Veldhoven, M. 2012. Employee well-being and the HRM–organizational performance relationship: a review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Management Reviews14, 391–407. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00322.x

Villajos, E., Tordera, N. and Peiró, J. M. 2019. Human resource practices, eudaimonic well-being, and creative performance: the mediating role of idiosyncratic deals for sustainable human resource management. Sustainability11(24), 6933. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246933

Back to Issue