The main reasons for nurses leaving work are a high workload and a lack of support. The competence of nurses who have been away from professional practice for over five years has decreased, and their knowledge and skills need to be enhanced. Examining the experiences of those who have completed the return to practice programme makes it possible to implement necessary changes in the curriculum and to support returning to work.
The aim of the research is to describe nurses’ experiences of completing the ‘Nurses back to healthcare’ training and returning to professional work between 2020 and 2024.
The research employed both qualitative and quantitative methods. In the first stage, from May to August 2023, semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight participants who had completed the training between 2020 and 2021. In the second stage, in April 2024, an online survey was conducted among all individuals who had completed the training from 2020 to 2024 (n = 70), with 43 (61.4%) participants responding.
The participants wanted more contact learning, which would facilitate the achievement of learning outcomes and strengthen social ties. The theoretical learning was sometimes considered overly comprehensive, and more practice was desired. The participants found that the studies were sometimes intensive, and the practice could be distributed across various healthcare institutions.
It was suggested that the college should establish direct communications with employers who would forward specific job offers. Nurses who have been away from professional work for an extended period need greater opportunities for practicing manual activities and additional support upon their return to work.
Barlow, S., Verey, A., Srivastava, N., York, W., Lamontagne-Godwin, F., Ellis, M. et al. 2019. An evaluation of the return to practice programme (nursing) at City University of London (2017‒2018).
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24392.67841
Bearman, M. 2019. Focus on methodology: eliciting rich data: a practical approach to writing semi-structured interview schedules. Focus Health Prof. Ed., 20(3), 1‒11.
https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v20i3.387
Cao, Y., Chen, R. C. and Katz, A. J. 2024. Why is a small sample size not enough? Oncologist, 29(9), 761–763.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae162
Chaghari, M., Saffari, M., Ebadi, A. and Ameryoun, A. 2017. Empowering education: a new model for in-service training of nursing staff. J. Adv. Med. Educ. Prof., 5(1), 26‒32.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5238493/
Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D. 2022. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 6th ed. Sage Publications, Inc.
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K. and Kyngäs, H. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1).
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633
Garside, J., Stephenson, J., Hayles, J., Barlow, N. and Ormrod, G. 2021. Explaining nursing attrition through the experiences of return-to-practice students: a mixed-methods study. Br. J. Nurs., 30(8), 490–496.
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.8.490
ICN (International Council of Nurses). 2021. ICN policy brief ‒ the global nursing shortage and nurse retention. https://www. icn.ch/node/1297 (accessed 2024-08-01).
Kent, L. N. 2015. For love or money: registered nurses who return to hospital practice. J. Nurs. Manag., 23(5), 599–603.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12185
Kharazmi, E., Bordbar, N. and Bordbar, S. 2023. Distribution of nursing workforce in the world using Gini coefficient. BMC Nurs., 22(1), 151.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01313-w
Kööp, K. 2020. Projekti „Õed tagasi tervishoidu“ kulg ja tulemused (The course and results of the project ‘Nurses back to healthcare’). In Eesti õendus ajas ja muutumises (Estonian Nursing in Time and Change) (Tulva, T., Talvik, M., Puusepp, K., Ernits, Ü. and Routasalo, P. E., eds). Tallinn Health Care College, Tallinn, 86–92.
https://ttk.ee/sites/ttk.ee/files/16.10.20_TTK_Odede_kogumik_1-140_veeb.pdf (accessed 2024-08-01).
Kööp, K. and Tupits, M. 2025. Completing the ‘Nurses back to healthcare’ training and returning to professional work: a qualitative study of nurses’ experiences. BMC Nurs., 24, 781.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03281-9
Martens, R., Hou, M., Isherwood, S. and Cuthbert, C. 2024. Exploring COVID-19’s impact on undergraduate nursing students. Pap. Postsecond. Learn. Teach., 7, 70‒80.
https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/pplt.v7Y2024.77874
Matsuo, M., Suzuki, E., Takayama, Y., Shibata, S. and Sato, K. 2021. Influence of striving for work–life balance and sense of coherence on intention to leave among nurses: a 6-month prospective survey. Inquiry, 58.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580211005192
McMurtrie, L. J., Cameron, M., Oluanaigh, P. and Osborne, Y. T. 2014. Keeping our nursing and midwifery workforce: factors that support non-practising clinicians to return to practice. Nurse Educ. Today, 34(5), 761–765.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.08.017
Mohammadi, N., Seyedfatemi, N., Nikbakht-Nasrabadi, A. and Mahmoudi, M. 2021. Struggle turning back to professional nursing practice in Iran: a qualitative study. Iran. J. Nurs. Midwifery Res., 26(1), 75–80.
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_110_20
Molina-Azorín, J. F. 2016. Mixed methods research: an opportunity to improve our studies and our research skills. Eur. J. Manag. Bus. Econ., 25(2), 37‒38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.redeen.2016.05.001
Moorley, C. and Cathala, X. 2019. How to appraise qualitative research. Evid.-based Nurs., 22(1), 10‒13.
https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2018-103044
Morse, J. M. 2015. ‘Data were saturated…’. Qual. Health Res., 25(5), 587‒588.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315576699
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K. and Ranfagni, S. 2023. A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. Int. J. Qual. Methods, 22.
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Estonia: Country Health Profile 2023.
https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2023/12/estonia-country-health-profile-2023_89043bfe.html (accessed 2024-08-01).
Scammell, J. 2019. Back to nursing: new standards for return to practice programmes. Br. J. Nurs., 28(11), 723.
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.11.723
Schoonenboom, J. and Johnson, R. B. 2017. How to construct a mixed methods research design. Köln Z. Soziol., 69(Suppl. 2), 107‒131.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
Tamata, A. T. and Mohammadnezhad, M. 2023. A systematic review study on the factors affecting shortage of nursing workforce in the hospitals. Nurs. Open, 10(3), 1247–1257.
https://doi.org/10.10 02/nop2.1434
Terviseamet (Estonian Health Board). 2024. Terviseameti registrid. Tervishoiutöötajad (Registers of the Health Board. Healthcare workers).
https://medre.tehik.ee/search/employees (accessed 2024-08-01).
Tervisestatistika ja terviseuuringute andmebaas (Health Statistics and Health Research Database). 2024. THT001: Tervishoiutöötajad, täidetud ametikohad ja ületunnid ameti järgi (Healthcare workers, filled positions and overtime by occupation).
https://statistika.tai.ee/pxweb/et/Andmebaas/Andmebaas__04THressursid__05Tootajad/THT001.px/table/tableViewLayout2/ (accessed 2024-08-01).
Vetter, T. R. 2017. Descriptive statistics: reporting the answers to the 5 basic questions of who, what, why, when, where, and a sixth, so what? Anesth Analg., 125(5), 1797–1802.
https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002471
WHO (World Health Organization). 2020. State of the world’s nursing 2020: investing in education, jobs and leadership.
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240003279 (accessed 2024-08-01).
Yamamoto, K., Nasu, K., Nakayoshi, Y. and Takase, M. 2024. Sustaining the nursing workforce ‒ exploring enabling and motivating factors for the retention of returning nurses: a qualitative descriptive design. BMC Nurs., 23(1), 248.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01900-5
Zyoud, R. N. 2023. Theory-practice gap in nursing education at Arab American University. Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci., 9(2), 461‒472.
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3086
