ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1984
 
Oil Shale cover
Oil Shale
ISSN 1736-7492 (Electronic)
ISSN 0208-189X (Print)
Impact Factor (2022): 1.9
Reduction of life cycle impacts of oil shale electricity caused by the shift to fluidized bed combustion technology; pp. 252–269
PDF | https://doi.org/10.3176/oil.2022.4.02

Authors
Siret Talve, Evelin Põld
Abstract

In 2004–2005, the pulverized firing technology that had been used for decades was replaced with fluidized bed combustion in some boilers of two major power plants located in North-East Estonia. The objective of the current study was to identify the impact of this technology switch on the efficiency, resource use and environmental performance of oil shale electricity generation. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14040 series and the International Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) System standards was applied to analyzing the effects of the mentioned technology switch. In this study, the functional unit of the product system of oil shale electricity is 1 kWh of oil shale electricity transmitted to the Estonian customer. The specific oil shale electricity inventory data that can be used in life cycle assessments of other products are presented. The comparison of the life cycle environmental impact of oil shale electricity before and after changing the combustion technology is provided. Climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions is the key impact to be tackled. The gain in electricity generation efficiency due to the change of the combustion technology had a remarkable positive impact on greenhouse and acidifying gas reduction. Also, the impact on creating ground-level ozone and eutrophication diminished. Reduction of ozone depleting gases, however, was minimal. The critical review of this LCA has been carried out by an independent expert.

References

1. Zendehboudi, S., Bahadori, A. Shale Oil and Gas Handbook: Theory, Technologies, and Challenges. Australia: Elsevier Inc., 2015
https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-01653-X

2. Oil Shale Competence Center. Oil Shale Industry Yearbook 2020 (Oone, A., ed.). Kohtla-Järve: Tallinn University of Technology, Eesti Energia AS, Viru Keemia Grupp AS, Kiviõli Keemiatööstus OÜ, 2021 (in Estonian). 
https://taltech.ee/polevkivi-kompetentsikeskus-aastaraamat

3. Ots, A. Oil Shale Fuel Combustion. Tallinn: Tallinna Raamatutrükikoda, 2006.

4. Raukas, A., Punning, J.-M. Environmental problems in the Estonian oil shale industry. Energy Environ. Sci., 2009, 2(7), 723‒728.
https://doi.org/10.1039/b819315k

5. Wang, S., Jiang, X., Han, X., Tong, J. Investigation of Chinese oil shale resources comprehensive utilization performance. Energy, 2012, 42(1), 224‒232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.066

6. Hotta, A., Parkkonen, R., Hiltunen, M., Arro, H., Loosaar J., Parve, T., Pihu, T., Prikk, A., Tiikma, T. Experience of Estonian oil shale combustion based on CFB technology at Narva Power Plants. Oil Shale, 2005, 22(4S), 381‒397.
https://doi.org/10.3176/oil.2005.4S.02

7. Han, X., Jiang, X., Wang, H., Cui, Z. Study on design of Huadian oil shale-fired circulating fluidized bed boiler. Fuel Process. Technol., 2006,87(4), 289‒295.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.04.006

8. Jiang, X. M., Han, X. X., Cui, Z. G. New technology for the comprehensive utilization of Chinese oil shale resources. Energy, 2007, 32(5), 772–777.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.05.001

9. EPD International AB. Product-Specific Requirements (PSR) for Preparing an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Electricity and District Heat Generation” (PSR 2004:2). PSR, Stockholm, 2011. 
www.environdec.com/

10. Talve, S., Riipulk, V. An inventory analysis of oil shale energy produced on a small thermal power plant. J. Clean. Prod., 2001, 9(3), 233‒242.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00056-1

11. Talve, S., Riipulk, V. Suggestions to improve oil shale industry water management basing on inventory analysis of Life Cycle Assessment. Oil Shale, 2001, 18(1), 35‒46.
https://doi.org/10.3176/oil.2001.1.05

12. Mangmeechai, A., Jaramillo, P., Griffin, W. M., Matthews, H. S. Life cycle consumptive water use for oil shale development and implications for water supply in the Colorado River Basin. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 2014, 19(3), 677‒687. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0651-8

13. Koskela, S., Seppälä, J., Lipp, A., Hiltunen, M-R., Põld, E., Talve, S. Estonian electricity supply scenarios for 2020 and their environmental performance. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(7), 3571‒3582.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.001

14. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management  Life cycle assessment  Principles and framework. ISO, 2006.

15. EPD International AB. Product Category Rules CPC 171 & 173: Electricity, Steam, and Hot and Cold Water Generation and Distribution; PCR 2007:08, Version 2.01. PCR, Stockholm, 2011. 
https://environdec.com/

16. EPD International. General Programme Instructions of the International EPD® System. Version 1.0, dated 2008-02-29.

Back to Issue