ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1984
 
Oil Shale cover
Oil Shale
ISSN 1736-7492 (Electronic)
ISSN 0208-189X (Print)
Impact Factor (2022): 1.9
STUDY ON THE QUANTITATIVE MODEL OF OIL SHALE POROSITY IN THE PYROLYSIS PROCESS BASED ON PYROLYSIS KINETICS; pp. 128–143
PDF | https//doi.org/10.3176/oil.2018.2.03

Authors
Jian Liu, WEIGUO LIANG, ZHIQIN KANG, HAOJIE LIAN, Yide Geng
Abstract

Investigation of the porosity variation of oil shale during the pyrolysis process is of great importance in understanding the migration mechanism of pyrolysis products. Using the Fushun oil shale of China as an example and taking into account the fact that the porosity change of oil shale arises from pyrolysis of kerogen at high temperature, in this paper, the thermal curve of oil shale was employed to obtain its pyrolysis rate equation. A quantitative model of oil shale porosity during pyrolysis was constructed. The porosity of oil shale under different pyrolysis conditions was determined using the conventional method, computed tomography (CT) and the mercury intrusion method. The calculated results were in good agreement with the experimental data.

References

1.       Kang, Z. The Pyrolysis Characteristics and In-situ Hot Drive Simulation Research that Exploit Oil-gas of Oil Shale. PhD thesis, Taiyuan University of Technology, 2008 (in Chinese with English abstract).

2.       Kang, Z., Yang, D., Zhao, Y., Hu, Y. Thermal cracking and corresponding perme­ability of Fushun oil shale. Oil Shale, 2011, 28(2), 273–283.
https://doi.org/10.3176/oil.2011.2.02

3.       Eseme, E., Krooss, B. M., Littke, R. Evolution of petrophysical properties of oil shales during high-temperature compaction tests: Implications for petroleum expulsion. Mar. Petrol. Geol., 2012, 31(1), 110–124.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.11.005

4.       Tiwari, P., Miller, J. D. Characterization of oil shale pore structure before and after pyrolysis by using X-ray micro CT. Fuel, 2013, 107, 547–554.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.01.006

5.       Zhao, J. Experimental Study on the Microscopic Characteristics and Mechanical Property of Oil Shale under High Temperature & Three-Dimensional Stress. PhD thesis, Taiyuan University of Technology, 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract).

6.       Jiang, X. Study about the Impacts of Oil Shale In-situ Mining on Groundwater Environment. PhD thesis, Jilin University, 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract).

7.       Qiu, S. Experimental Study on the Impacts of Oil Shale In-situ Pyrolysis on Groundwater Hydrochemical Characteristics. PhD thesis, Jilin University, 2016 (in Chinese with English abstract).

8.       Bai, F., Guo, M. Evaluation of the porous structure of Huadian oil shale during pyrolysis using multiple approaches. Fuel, 2017, 187, 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.09.012

9.       The Ministry of Coal Industry of People’s Republic of China. MT 40-80, Rock Apparent Density Testing Standard. China Standards Press, Beijing, 1980 (in Chinese).

10.  The Ministry of Coal Industry of People’s Republic of China. GB 217-81, Coal True Relative Density Testing Standard. China Standards Press, Beijing, 1981 (in Chinese).

11.  The Ministry of Coal Industry of People’s Republic of China. MT 41-80, Rock Porosity Testing Standard. China Standards Press, Beijing, 1980 (in Chinese).

12.  Guo, S., Geng, L. Study on pyrolysis kinetics of oil shales by thermogravimetry. J. Fuel. Chem. & Tech., 1986, 14(3), 21–27 (in Chinese with English abstract).

13.  Wang, G. Study on Kinetics of Oil Shale Pyrolysis Products Generation Process. Master thesis, Northeast Dianli University, 2012 (in Chinese with English abstract).

14.  Geng, L., Guo, S. The kinetics of the thermal decomposition of Huadian oil shale by thermogravimetry. J. Dalian. Univ. Tech., 1984, 23(4), 39–44 (in Chinese with English abstract).

15.  Yang, J. Thermogravimetric investigation of Maoming oil shale pyrolysis kinetics. J. China. Univ. Petrol. (Edition of Natural Science), 1982, (3), 85–93 (in Chinese with English abstract).

16.  Coats, A. W., Redfern, J. P. Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature, 1964, 201, 68–69.
https://doi.org/10.1038/201068a0

17.  Weitkamp, A. W., Gutberlet, L. C. Application of a microretort to problems in shale pyrolysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 1970, 9(3), 386–395.
https://doi.org/10.1021/i260035a006

18.  Shih, S. M., Sohn, H. Y. Nonisothermal determination of the intrinsic kinetics of oil generation from oil shale. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev., 1980, 19(3), 420–426.
https://doi.org/10.1021/i260075a016

19.  Braun, R. L., Rothman, A. J. Oil-shale pyrolysis: Kinetics and mechanism of oil production. Fuel, 1975, 54(2), 129–131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(75)90069-1

20.  Qian, J., Yin, L. Oil Shale: Petroleum Alternative. China Petrochemical Press, Beijing, 2008 (in Chinese).

21.  Qin, K. Investigation on the constitution and structure of Maoming and Fushun oil shale. Part 3: Average building block of organic matter. J. Fuel. Chem & Tech., 1986, 14(1), 3–10 (in Chinese with English abstract).

22.  Li, S., Qian, J. Study of the pyrolysis of Maoming oil shale lumps. Fuel, 1991, 70(12), 1371–1375.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(91)90001-Q

23.   Li, S., Qian, J. Investigation on the pyrolysis of Fushun oil shale and Estonian Kukersite lumps. Oil Shale, 1992, 9(3), 222–230.

Back to Issue