This paper concerns the active/passive voice alternation in Kazym Khanty. According to the existing literature, the use of passive in Khanty is conditioned by information structure. Kazym dialect data, however, suggest that there are other parameters such as givenness and animacy that affect the choice of voice. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the relevant parameters and highlight the ways they interact. The study reveals that in all-new contexts with no established topic speakers choose the voice construction based on animacy, while givenness and topicality play a decisive role on later stages of the discourse.
Cooreman, A. 1984, A Functional Analysis of Passives in Chamorro Narrative Discourse. — Research on Language & Social Interaction 17 (4), 395—428.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389216
Dryer, M. S. 1994, The Discourse Function of the Kutenai Inverse. — Voice and Inversion, Amsterdam—Philadelphia.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.28.06dry
É. Kiss, K. 2019, Fused Grammatical and Discourse Functions in Ob-Ugric: Case, Agreement, Passive. — Arbeitspapier 130. Proceedings of the Workshop Clause Typing and the Syntax-to-Discourse Relation in Head-Final Languages, Konstanz, 163—174.
Filchenko, A. 2005, Non-Canonical Agent-Marking in Eastern Khanty: A Functional-Pragmatic Perspective. — University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 11 (1), 29—40.
Filchenko, A. 2011, Parenthetical Agent-Demoting Constructions in Eastern Khanty: Discourse Salience vis-à-vis Referring Expressions. — Salience. Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Its Function in Discourse, Berlin, 57—80.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241020.57
Filchenko, A. 2012, Continuity of Information Structuring Strategies in Eastern Khanty. — Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. A Crosslinguistic Typology, Amsterdam, 115—131.
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.126.05fil
Givón, T. 1983, Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-Language Study, Amsterdam—Philadelphia.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., Zacharski, R. 1993, Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse. — Language 64, 274—307.
https://doi.org/10.2307/416535
Klaiman, M. H. 1993, The Relationship of Inverse Voice and Head-Marking in Arizona Tewa and Other Tanoan Languages. — Studies in Language 17 (2), 343—370.
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17.2.04kla
Krifka, M. 2008, Basic Notions of Information Structure. — Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55 (3—4), 243—276.
https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.2
Kulonen, U.-M. 1989, The Passive in Ob-Ugrian, Helsinki (MSFOu 203).
Lambrecht, K. 1994, Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607
Nakayama, T. 1997, Functions of the Nootka (Nuu-chah-nulth) ”Passive” Suffix. — International Journal of American Linguistics 63 (3), 412—431.
https://doi.org/10.1086/466338
Nikolaeva, I. 2001, Secondary Topic as a Relation in Information Structure. — Linguistics 39 (1), 1—50.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.006
Passivization and Typology. Form and Function, Amsterdam 2006.
Shibatani, M. 1985, Passives and Related Constructions: A Prototype Analysis. — Language 61 (4), 821—848.
https://doi.org/10.2307/414491
Shibatani, M. 1988, Introduction. — Passive and Voice, Amsterdam (Typological Studies in Language 16), 1—8.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.16.03shi
Thompson, C. 1994, Passive and Inverse Constructions. — Voice and Inversion, Amsterdam—Philadelphia 1994 (Typological Studies in Language 28), 47—63.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.28.05tho
Voice and Inversion, Amsterdam—Philadelphia 1994 (Typological Studies in Language 28).
Zuñiga, F. 2006, Deixis and Alignment. Inverse Systems in Indigenous Languages of the Americas, Amsterdam—Philadelphia.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.70
Zúñiga, F., Kittilä, S. 2019, Grammatical Voice, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671399
Каксин А. Д. 2010, Казымский диалект хaнтыйского языка, Ханты-Мансийск.
Кошкарева Н. Б. 2002, Коммуникативная прадигма хантыйского предложения. — Языки коренных народов Сибири. Вып. 12, Новосибирск, 29—44.
Михайлов С. К. 2018, Почему хантыйские имена нуждаются в определенном артикле? — Пятнадцатая Конференция по типологии и грамматике для молодых исследователей. Тезисы докладов (Санкт-Петербург, 22—24 ноября 2018 г.), Санкт-Петербург, 79—81.
Мымрина Д. Ф. 2005, Активная и пассивная конструкции в хантыйском языке. — Вестник Томского государственного педагогического университета 4, Томск, 95—98.
Соловар В. Н. 2010, Статальные элементарные простые предложения с пассивными формами глагольного сказуемого в казымском диалекте хантыйского языка. — Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Серия: История, филология 9 (2), 91—98.
Черемисина М. И., Соловар В. Н. 1991, Залоговость, переходность, прямой объект в языках разных систем. — Языки народов Сибири. Грамматические исследования, Новосибирск, 66—84.
