ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1965
 
Linguistica Uralica cover
Linguistica Uralica
ISSN 1736-7506 (Electronic)
ISSN 0868-4731 (Print)

The Morphosyntactic Manifestations of the Copula in Erzya; pp. 191-204

Full article in PDF format | https://dx.doi.org/10.3176/lu.2018.3.03

Author
Niina Aasmäe

Abstract

Mordvin and several distantly related, prevalently Samoyedic and Ugric, languages can encode nonverbal predication with adnominal phrases supported by the markers of tense, number, and person. In Mordvin, the indicative present and second past tense are formed by using this strategy, e.g. Erzya od-at/-o-l'-it' young-prs/pst2.2sg ’(you) are/were young’. The agreement markers in the two sets of forms, with the exception of the zero third person markers, are common to the core present and past tense paradigms. According to a point of view, discussed in a series of recent publications, the person markers used with adnominal phrases are suffixes taken over from the verbal paradigms. Overlap between the markers of the adnominal and verbal forms is the general argument in favor of the approach. Defined as ”nominal conjugation”, the strategy has been viewed as a phenomenon of morphology that functions apart from the copular verb ul'ems ’be’ and the ”zero copula”. In the earlier literature, the adnominal phrases supported by the agreement markers have been considered copular ­constructions.
The author of this article finds it consistent to define the markers in question as the enclitic manifestations of the copula, rather than affixes directly taken over from the verbal paradigms. Nonverbal predication in Erzya, on this premise, is analysable as a morphosyntactic system realized through the stand-alone forms of the copula as well as the enclitic, comparatively transparent, forms of the copula ul'ems, including the covert counterparts of the third person. The suggested approach allows for greater precision in the description of nonverbal predication in Erzya as well as in a broader context.


References

Aasmäe, N. 2015, The Observations of Heikki Paasonen Concerning Word Stress in Erzya and Moksha. - JSFOu 95, 9-23.

Bartens, R. 1999, Mordvalaiskielten rakenne ja kehitys, Helsinki (MSFOu 232).

Collinder, B. 1960, Comparative Grammar of the Uralic Languages, Uppsala.

Hallap, V. 2000, Verbaaltuletussufiksid mordva keeltes, Tallinn (Eesti keele instituudi toimetised 5).

Hamari, A. 2007, The Negation of Stative Relation Clauses in the Mordvin Languages, Helsinki (MSFOu 254).
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.108.11ham

Hamari, A., Aasmäe, N. 2015, Negation in Erzya. - Negation in Uralic Languages, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, 293-323.

Honti, L. 1992, Morphologische Merkmale des nominalen Prädikats in einigen uralischen Sprachen. - LU XXVIII, 262-271.

Keresztes, L. 2011, Bevezetés a mordvin nyelvészetbe, Debrecen.

Kholodilova, M. 2016, Moksha Non-Verbal Predication. - Mordvin Languages in the Field, Helsinki (Uralica Helsingiensia 10), 229-259.

Miestamo, M. 2005, Standard Negation. The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective, Berlin-New York (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 31).

Moravcsik, E. A. 2013, Introducing Language Typology, Cambridge (Cambridge Introductions to Language and Linguistics).

Rueter, J. M. 2010, Adnominal Person in the Morphological System of Erzya, Helsinki (MSFOu 261.

Siewierska, A. 2011. Person Marking. - The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Oxford, 322-345.

Spencer, A., Luís, A. R. 2012, Clitics, Cambridge.

Stassen, L. 1997, Intransitive Predication, Oxford (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory).

Turunen, R. 2010, Nonverbal Predication in Erzya. Studies on Morphosyntactic Variation and Part of Speech Distinctions. Doctoral Thesis, Tallinn.

Veselinova, L. (with Hedvig Skirgård) 2015, Special Negators in the Uralic Languages. - Negation in Uralic Languages, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, 547-599.

Vilkuna, M. 1997, Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe - Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20-1, Berlin, 173-233.

Wiedemann, F. J. 1865, Grammatik der Ersa-mordwinischen Sprache, St. Petersburg (Mémoires de l’Académie impériale des sciences de St. Péterbourg, sér. 7, t. 9, no. 5.).

Zaicz, G. 2006, Mordva. - The Uralic Languages, London-New York, 184-218.

Zwicky, A. M. 1985, Clitics and Particles. - Language 61, 283-305.
https://doi.org/10.2307/414146

Zwicky, A. M., Pullum, G. K. 1983, Cliticization vs. Inflection: the Case of English n’t. - Language 59, 502-513.
https://doi.org/10.2307/413900

Бубрих Д. В. 1947, Эрзя-мордовская грамматика-минимум. Пособие для вузов, Саранск.

Евсевьев М. Е. 1931, Основы мордовской грамматики, Москва.

Имайкина М. Д. 2008, Неень шкань эрзянь келесь. Фонетика, Саранск.

Керестеш Л. 2017, Основы мордовского языкознания, Debrecen.

Ледяйкина В. А. 1980, Синтаксические функции причастия законченного действия с суффиксом -зь в эрзя-мордовском языке. - Финно-угрис­тика 3, Саранск, 84-95.

Майтинская К. Е. 1979, Историко-сопоставительная морфология финно-угорских языков, Москва.

Марков Ф. П. 1961, Приалатырский диалект эрзя-мордовского языка. - Очерки мордовских диалектов 1, Саранск, 7-99.

Палль В. 1955, Времена и наклонения в мордовских языках. Автореферат кандидатской диссертации, Тарту.

Надькин Д. Т. 1980, Глагол. Категория наклонения. — Грамматика мордовских языков, Саранск, 268—301.

Рябов А. П. 1934, Эрзянь келень грамматика. Синтаксис, Москов.

Серебренников Б. А. 1967, Историческая морфология мордовских языков, Москва.

Цыганкин Д. В. 1961, Шугуровский диалект эрзя-мордовского языка. - Очерки мордовских диалектов 1, Саранск, 294-395.

Цыпкайкина В. П. 2000, Глагол. - Эрзянь кель. Морфология, Саранск, 146—216.

Цыпкайкина В. П. 2011, Кавто прявт пельксэнь валрисьметне. Подлежащеесь ды сказуемоесь. - Эрзянь кель. Синтаксис, Саранск, 37-54.

Шахматов А. А. 1910, Мордовский этнографический сборник, Ст. Петербург.

Щемерова В. С. 1980, Категория вида. - Грамматика мордовских языков, Саранск, 335-344.

Эрзянь кель. Морфология, Саранск 2000.


Back to Issue