A language universal supposed by L. Palmaitis is worded as follows: "In those systems where the special form of accusative is attested, the category of gender does exist." A. P. Volodin groups Uralic languages with those that are known as being of an accusativeless structure: Uralic languages are accusativeless because in those languages there is no individual case form for a direct object (thus in the case of an object the (*)m-suffixe expresses its unmarkedness/markedness, indefiniteness/definiteness). If Uralic languages lack the category of grammatical gender (and there is no doubt about its lacking), then it does not make sense to look for an actual grammatical accusative case in them. We would consider the incidence of the Samoyedic common object suffix (*)-m as very old in Samoyedic languages, as a primary phenomenon, so to say.
Farkas, J. von 1956, Der Genitiv und der Akkusativ in der uralischen Grundsprache. - UAJb. XXVIII, 5-17.
Greenberg, J. H. 2000, Indo-European and Its Closest Relatives. The Eurasiatic language family I. Grammar, Stanford.
Gulya, J. 1995, Transitivität, Determiniertheit und objektive Konjugation. - CIFU VIII. Pars III, 96-99.
Joki, A. J. 1944, Kai Donners Kamassisches Wörterbuch nebst Sprachproben und Hauptzügen der Grammatik, Helsinki (LSFU 8).
Katz, H. 1970, Zwei Etymologien. - NyK 72, 147-150.
Klesment, P., Künnap, A., Soosaar, S.-E., Taagepera, R. 2003, Common Phonetic and Grammatical Features of Uralic Languages and Other Languages in Northern Eurasia. - Journal of Indo-European Studies 31 3 & 4, 363-390.
Künnap, A. 2002, Main Language Shifts in the Uralic Language Group, [München-Newcastle] (LINCOM Studies in Asian Linguistics 45).
Künnap, A. 2005, About the Form of the Uralic Direct Object. - Phonetics, Grammar and Lexis, Tartu (FU 27), 100-109.
Marcantonio, A. 2002, The Uralic Language Family: Facts, Myths and Statistics, Oxford-Boston (Publications of the Philological Society 35).
Palmaitis, L. 1978, Tipologinès pastabos dèl gimine˙s kategorijos formavimosi. - Baltistica 14 1, 27-ce37.
https://doi.org/10.15388/baltistica.14.1.1246
Pusztay, J. 1995, Diskussionsbeiträge zur Grundsprachenforschung (Beispiel: das Protouralische), Wiesbaden (Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 43).
Pusztay, J. 2000, Szakszógyüjtemény az uráli nyelvek tanulmányozásához, Szombathely.
Rédei, K. 1975, Der Akkusativ in den uralischen Sprachen (Zum Kasussystem der uralischen Grundsprache). - CIFU III. Pars I, 133-138.
Volodin, A. P. 1997, Finnisch-ugrische (uralische) Sprachen in Kontakt. Zur allgemeinen Fragestellung. - Finnisch-ugrische Sprachen in Kontakt. Vorträge des Symposiums aus Anlaß des 30-jährigen Bestehens der Finnougristik an der Rijksuniversiteit Groningen 21.-23. November 1996, Maastricht, 35-43.
Wickman, B. 1955, The Form of the Object in the Uralic Languages, Uppsala-Wiesbaden (UUÅ 6).
Volodin A. P. 2000, Bezakkuzativnost' kak tipologičeskaja dominanta ural'skih jazykov (Na materiale finskogo). - Materialy Meždunarodnoj naučno-metodičeskoj konferentsii prepodavatelej i aspirantov, posvjaščennoj 75-letiju kafedry finno-ugorskoj filologii SpbGU. Sankt-Peterburg, 16-17 marta 2000 g., [Sankt-Peterburg], 35-43.
Illič-Svityč V. M. 1971, Opyt sravnenija nostratičeskih jazykov (semitohamitskij, kartvel'skij, indoevropejskij, ural'skij, dravidijskij, altajskij). Vvedenie. Sravnitel'nyj slovar' (b-Ḳ), Moskva.
Illič-Svityč V. M. 1976, Opyt sravnenija nostratičeskih jazykov (semitohamitskij, kartvel'skij, indoevropejskij, ural'skij, dravidijskij, altajskij). Sravnitel'nyj slovar' (l-ȝ'), Moskva.
Majtinskaja K. E. 1974, Sravnitel'naja morfologija finno-ugorskih jazykov. - Osnovy finno-ugorskogo jazykoznanija (voprosy proishoždenija i razvitija finno-ugorskih jazykov), Moskva, 214-382.
Hajdu P. 1985, Ural'skie jazyki i narody, Moskva.
Judakin A. P. 1997, Sravnitel'no-istoričeskaja grammatika finno-ugorskih jazykov (Stanovlenie sistemy padežej), Moskva.
