Ingrian Finnish admits inverse attraction, the head of the relative clause being marked for case according to the position of the corresponding participant in the subordinate clause. Until now, the study of inverse attraction has been limited almost exclusively to the data of dead languages, which has resulted in a number of hypotheses based solely on written text frequencies. These hypotheses can be checked against Ingrian Finnish data. In particular, Ingrian Finnish shows a difference between inverse attraction constructions and correlatives, which are often regarded as equal or similar. Inverse attraction constructions, as opposed to correlatives, are characterized by compatibility with demonstratives and quantifiers in the head, appositive relative clauses and different kinds of agreement mismatches between the head and the relative pronoun. Arguably, these properties indicate a relatively low level of integration of the head into the relative clause.
Aghaei, B. 2006, The Syntax of Ke-Clause and Clausal Extraposition in Modern Persian, Austin (PhD Thesis. University of Texas at Austin).
Bader, M., Bayer, J. 2006, The Mental Representation of Case. - Case and Linking in Language Comprehension. Evidence from German, Dordrecht (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 34), 115-137.
Bhatt, R. 2005a, Correlative Clauses. Paper presented at LOT Summer School, Leiden.
Bhatt, R. 2005b, In search of Case Attraction. Paper presented at LOT Summer School, Leiden.
Bianchi, V. 1999, Consequences of Antisymmetry. Headed Relative Clauses, Berlin-New York.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110803372
Bianchi, V. 2000, Some Issues in the Syntax of Relative Determiners. - The Syntax of Relative Clauses, Philadelphia, 53-81.
Corbett, G. G. 2006, Agreement, Cambridge.
Fleischer, F. 2006, Dative and Indirect Object in German Dialects. Evidence from Relative Clauses. - Datives and Other Cases. Between Argument Structure and Event Structure, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, 213-238. PMid:17148365 PMCid:1618903
Fowler, H. W. 1994, A Dictionary of Modern English Usage, Hertfordshire.
Gonda, J. 1975, Selected Studies 1. Indo-European Linguistics, Leiden.
Grimm, S. M. 2005, Lattice of Case and Agentivity, Amsterdam (MSc Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam).
Hahn, E. A. 1964, Relative and Antecedent. - Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 95, 111-141.
Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T., Alho, I. 2004, Iso suomen kielioppi, Helsinki. (http://scripta.kotus.fi/visk/etusivu.php).
Harbert, W. 1983, A Note on Old English Free Relatives. - Linguistic Inquiry 14, 549-553.
Izvorski, R. 1997, Subject Free Relatives in Null-Subject Languages. Evidence from Slavic. - Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Cornell Meeting, 1995, Ann Arbor, 267-288.
Lancelot, C. 1696, Nouvelle méthode de messieur de Port Royal pour apprendre facilement la langue latine, Paris.
Lehmann, Ch. 1984, Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen. Theorie seiner Funktionen. Kompendium seiner Grammatik, Tübingen (Language Universals, Series 3).
Lehmann, Ch. 1986, On the Typology of Relative Clauses. - Linguistics 24, 663-680.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.4.663
Lehmann, Ch. 1988, Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage. - Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, 181-226.
Meillet, A., Vendryés, J. 1948, Traité de grammaire comparée des langues classiques, Paris. PMid:18908151
Mullonen, M. 2004, Elettiinpä ennen Inkeris. Näytteitä inkerinsuomalaisista murteista, Petroskoi.
Parker, F., Riley, K., Meyer, Ch. 1988, Case Assignment and the Ordering of Constituents in Coordinate Constructions. - American Speech 63, 3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/454819
Pääkkönen, I. 1988, Relatiivisanan valinta, Helsinki.
Pittner, K. 1995, The Case of German Relatives. - Linguistic Review 12, 197-231.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1995.12.3.197
Pogorelec, B. 1955/1956, Sintaktične napake v šolskih nalogah. - Jezik in slovstvo 1, 202-210.
Touratier, Ch. 1980, La relative. Essai de théorie syntaxique (à partir de faits latins, français, allemands, anglais, grecs, hébreux, etc.), Paris.
Vries, M. de 2002. The Syntax of Relativization, Utrecht (PhD Thesis).
Vries, M. de 2003, [Rev.] V. Bianchi, Consequences of Antisymmetry Headed Relative Clauses. - Lingua 113, 173-181.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00062-1
Кагарлицкий, Ю. В. 2004, Придаточные определительные с союзным словом кой в русском литературном языке первой половины XVIII века. - Русский язык в научном освeщении 1 (7), 136-156.
Сабо, Л. 1963, Очерки по синтаксису водского языка. Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата филологических наук, Лeningrad.
Смотрицкий, М. 1619, Грамматіки Славенския правилное Cvнтагма, Евье. (http://litopys.org.ua/smotrgram/sm.htm).
