, Andrea Parapatics , Szilárd SzentgyörgyiThe adaptation of West Old Turkic (WOT) loanwords into Hungarian is reevaluated in this work, with an emphasis on phonetic and phonological changes that occur during borrowing and the adaptation processes. Building on the previous work that measured phonetic distances using an improved Levenshtein distance algorithm, this study includes dataset adjustments and theoretical understanding of the different processes of borrowing and adaptation. The study separates the more significant rule-based phonological adaptations that have been seen throughout time from the more subtle phonetic changes that occurred during the initial borrowing stage. These results demonstrate the systematic phonological tendencies of L1 in absorbing foreign lexical items, illustrating the interaction between contact dynamics and language evolution. Additionally, the study reveals recurrent patterns of adaptation and the alteration of certain phonemes, providing insight into the linguistic processes behind the nativization of loanwords. This study adds to broader discussions on phonological adaptation by resolving previous morpho-phonological inconsistencies and integrating improved data to offer a more thorough understanding of the phonetic and phonological dynamics in the adaptation of WOT loanwords in Hungarian.
Agyagási, Klára 2019, Chuvash Historical Phonetics: An areal linguistic study with an Appendix on the Role of Proto-Mari in the History of Chuvash Vocalism, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag (Turcologica 117).
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh4zh9k
As-Sammer, Muhammed A. Abdul Sattar 2015, Phonetic and Phonological Adaptations of English Loanwords into Iraqi Arabic: A Generative Study. — Journal of the College of Arts, no. 73, 1—46.
https://doi.org/10.33762/1162-000-073-012
Clements, George N. & Keyser, Samuel Jay 1983, CV Phonology. A Generative Theory of the Syllable, Cambridge: MIT Press.
http://seas3.elte.hu/egg12/clements-keyser-83.pdf
Danesi, Marcel 1985, Loanwords and phonological methodology, Ottawa: Didier (Studia Phonetica 20).
Erdal, Marcel 2018, Review of A. Róna-Tas & Á. Berta, West Old Turkic. Turkic Loanwords in Hungarian. Harrassowitz 2011 = Turcologica 84. — Orientalistische Literaturzeitung, 113—116.
Honti Lásló 2017, A magyar és a nyugati ótörök szókészleti kapcsolatairól, Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.
Hyman, Larry M. 1970, The role of borrowing in the justification of phonological grammar.
https://www.academia.edu/24409087/The_role_of_borrowing_in_the_justification_of_phonological_grammars
Jacobs, Haike & Gussenhoven, Carlos 2000, Loan Phonology: Perception, Salience, the Lexicon and OT. — J. Dekkers, F. van der Leeuw, J. van de Weijer (eds), Optimality Theory, Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238430.003.0006
Jaggers, Zachary & Baese-Berk, Melissa 2020, Investigating a bias for cue preservation in loanword adaptation. — The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. Volume 147, Issue 6.
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001375
Kenstowicz, Michael 2001, Review Article: The Role of Perception in Loanword Phonology. A review of Les emprunts linguistiques d’origine européenne en Fon by Flavien Gbéto, Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, 2000. — Studies in African Linguistics. Volume 32, 95—112.
LaCharité, Darlene & Paradis, Carole 2005, Category Preservation and Proximity versus Phonetic Approximation in Loanword Adaptation. — Linguistic Inquiry. Vol. 36, No. 2, 223—258.
https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389053710666
Lovins, Julie B. 1975, Loanwords and the Phonological Structure of Japanese, Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Navracsics, Judit 2016, Living with two languages and cultures. The complexity of self-definition for bilingual individuals. — Hungarian Journal of Applied Linguistics. Issue XVI, no. 2, 1—23.
http://doi.org/10.18460/ANY.2016.2.006
Paradis, Carole & Lacharité, Darlene 2011, Loanword Adaptation: From Lessons Learned to Findings. — J. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, A. C. Yu (eds), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Second Edition, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 751—778.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch23
Róna-Tas, András & Berta, Árpád 2011, West Old Turkic. Turkic Loanwords in Hungarian I—II,Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Savelyev, Alexander & Robbeets, Martin 2020, Bayesian phylolinguistics infers the internal structure and the time-depth of the Turkic language family.— Journal of Language Evolution. Volume 5, Issue 1, 39—53.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzz010
Stachowski, Marek 2014, Remarks on the investigation of the oldest layer of Turkic loanwords in Hungarian. — Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia. Volume 19, Issue 4, 215—222.
Yalçınkaya, Ali Can 2024, Turkic Loanwords in Hungarian: A study concerning loanword adaptation. Phd Dissertation, Veszprém: University of Pannonia.
Yalçınkaya, Ali Can & Parapatics, Andrea & Szentgyörgyi, Szilárd 2023, Adaptation Rates of West Old Turkic Loanwords in Hungarian: A Quantitative Study. — Turkish Studies — Language and Literature. Volume 18, Issue 2, 1395—1427.
https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.64798
