This study investigates the morphosyntactic coding of core arguments in Northern Khanty, with a focus on the use of active/passive voice and subjective/objective conjugation. The goal is to offer a more detailed understanding of the coding patterns across dialects. To achieve this, I analyze corpus data from four Northern Khanty dialects: Obdorsk, Shuryshkary, Tegi, and Kazym Khanty, using a dataset of 4,320 transitive clauses from available corpora. These clauses are manually annotated based on parameters of person, animacy, referential status, and topicality. The analysis reveals that Northern Khanty exhibits varying degrees of hierarchical alignment across its dialects, forming a gradient from north to south. Based on this observation, I argue that Northern Khanty historically transitioned from nominative/accusative alignment to symmetrical alignment, remnants of which can be observed in the Obdorsk dialect and in Eastern Khanty. It further evolved into hierarchical alignment, as seen in the present-day Kazym dialect.
Aissen, Judith 1997, On the Syntax of Obviation.— Language 73:4, 705—750.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/417324
Aissen, Judith 2001, The Obviation Hierarchy and Morphosyntactic Markedness. — Linguistica Atlantica 23, 1—34.
Arka, I Wayan 2002, Voice Systems in the Austronesian Languages of Nusantara: Typology, Symmetricality and Undergoer Orientation. A paper (invited) to be presented at the 10th National Symposium of the Indonesian Linguistics Society, Bali-Indonesia, July 2002.
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/server/api/core/bitstreams/697ef412-c4e6-473d-901b-60bcf60fe376/content
Bárány, András 2015, Differential Object Marking in Hungarian and the Morphosyntax of Case and Agreement. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
https://andras.barany.at/files/barany-dissertation.pdf
Bickel, Balthasar, Nichols, Johanna 2009, Case Marking and Alignment. — The Oxford Handbook of Case, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 304—321.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0021
Blust, Robert 2013, The Austronesian Languages.
https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/server/api/core/bitstreams/acb0151b-ebb5-4941-8f29-8f61a28c777e/content
Clark, Herbert H. 1975, Bridging. — Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing. TINLAP ’75. Proceedings of the 1975 Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/980190.980237
Collinder, Björn 1960, Comparative Grammar of the Uralic Languages, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Comrie, Bernard 1981, Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology, Oxford: Blackwell.
Dalrymple, Mary & Nikolaeva, Irina 2011, Objects and Information Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511993473
Däbritz, Chris Lasse 2020, Topik, Fokus und Informationsstatus. Modellierung am Material nordwestsibirischer Sprachen, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter (Language, Context and Cognition. Volume 17).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110716337
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1972, The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139084987
Dixon, Robert M. W., Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1997, A Typology of Argument-Determined Constructions. — Essays on Language Function and Language Type. Dedicated to T. Givón, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 71—113.
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.82.08dix
É. Kiss, Katalin 2019, Fused Grammatical and Discourse Functions in Ob-Ugric: Case, Agreement, Passive. — Arbeitspapier 130, 163—174.
Filchenko, Alexander Y. 2007, A Grammar of Eastern Khanty. Doctoral dissertation, Rice University.
https://repository.rice.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/ab28c5c1-1683-404c-92e3-818b44593c2e/content
Filchenko, Andrei 2012, Continuity of Information Structuring Strategies in Eastern Khanty. — Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. A Crosslinguistic Typology, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 115—131.
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.126.05fil
Foley, William A. 1998, Symmetrical Voice Systems and Precategoriality in Philippine Languages.
https://zenodo.org/records/5336774
Gildea, Spike & Zúñiga, Fernando 2016, Referential Hierarchies: A New Look at Some Historical and Typological Patterns. — Linguistics 54:3, 483—529.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2016-0007
Givón, Talmy 1983, Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-Language Study, Amsterdam—Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3
Givón, Talmy 1994, Introduction. — Voice and Inversion, Amsterdam—Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 3—44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/tsl.28
Goddard, Ives 1990, Aspects of the Topic Structure of Fox Narratives: Proximate Shifts and the Use of Overt and Inflectional NPs. — International Journal of American Linguistics 56:3, 317—40.
https://doi.org/10.1086/466161
Gulya, János 1970, Aktiv, Ergativ und Passiv im Vach-Ostjakischen. — Symposion über Syntax der uralischen Sprachen, Göttingen: Van den Hoock and Ruprecht, 80—83.
Gundel, Jeanette K. & Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron 1993, Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse. — Language 69:2, 274—307.
https://doi.org/10.2307/416535
Haspelmath, Martin 2011, On S, A, P, T, and R as Comparative Concepts for Alignment Typology. — Linguistic Typology 15:3, 535—567.
https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2011.035
Haude, Katharina & Zúñiga, Fernando 2016, Inverse and Symmetrical Voice: On Languages with Two Transitive Constructions. — Linguistics 54:3, 443—481.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2016-0009
Heim, Irene 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
https://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/jA2YTJmN/Heim%20Dissertation%20with%20Hyperlinks.pdf
Honti László 2022, Az ősi uráli tárgyragok története és vesszőfutása. Accusatum et expulsum, Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó (Segédkönyvek a nyelvészet tanulmányozásához 226).
Janhunen, Juha 2020, Grammaticalization in Uralic as Viewed from a General Eurasian Perspective. — Cross-Linguistic Variation and Universal Tendencies, Berlin—Boston: de Gruyter, 361—398.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110563146-007
Kamp, Hans 1981, A Theory of Truth and Semantic Interpretation. — Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Proceedings of the Third Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam: Mathematical Center, 277—322.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867602.1
Karttunen, Lauri 1976, Discourse Referents. — Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 7. Notes from the Linguistic Underground, New York: Academic Press, 363—385.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368859_021
Kibrik, Aleksandr E. 1997, Beyond Subject and Object: Toward a Comprehensive Relational Typology. — Linguistic Typology 1, 279—346.
https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1997.1.3.279
Klaiman, Miriam 1991, Grammatical Voice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klaiman, Miriam 1993, The Relationship of Inverse Voice and Head-Marking in Arizona Tewa and other Tanoan languages. — Studies in Language 17:2, 343—370.
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17.2.04kla
Koga, Hiroaki & Ohori, Toshio 2008, Reintroducing Inverse Constructions in Japanese. The Deictic Verb kuru ’to come’ in the Paradigms of Argument Encoding. — Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, Amsterdam: John Benjamins (Studies in Language Companion Series 105), 37—57.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105.07kog
Kulonen, Ulla-Maija 1989, The Passive in Ob-Ugrian, Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura (MSFOu 203).
Kuno, Susumo 1972, Functional Sentence Perspective: A Case Study from Japanese and English. — Linguistic Inquiry 3, 269—320.
Lambrecht, Knud 1994, Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511620607
Mithun, Marianne 2007, Integrating Approaches to Diversity: Argument Structure on the NW Coast. — Diversity in Language: Perspectives and Implications, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 9—36.
Muravyev, Nikita 2023, Passive in Kazym Khanty and the Interaction of Givenness, Topicality and Animacy. — LU LIX, 49—66.
https://doi.org/10.3176/lu.2023.1.04
Neale, Stephen 1990, Descriptions, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-X011-1
Nichols, Johanna 1992, Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001
Nikolaeva, Irina 1999, Ostyak, München: LINCOM Europa.
Nikolaeva, Irina 2001, Secondary Topic as a Relation in Information Structure. — Linguistics 39:1, 1—50.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.006
Nikolaeva, Irina & Bárány, András 2019, Proximate Possessors. — Prominent Internal Possessors, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 228—258.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198812142.003.0008
Russell, Bertrand 1905, On Denoting. — Mind, Volume XIV:4, 479—493.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479
Shibatani, Masayoshi 1985, Passives and Related Constructions: A Prototype Analysis. — Language 61:4, 821—848.
https://doi.org/10.2307/414491
Shibatani, Masayoshi 2003, Directional Verbs in Japanese. — Motion, Direction and Location in Languages, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 259—286.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.56.19shi
Sosa, Sachiko 2017, Functions of Morphosyntactic Alternations, and Information Flow in Surgut Khanty Discourse, Helsinki: University of Helsinki doctoral dissertation.
https://helda.helsinki.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/24971e30-3490-485d-a0e8-cd1ca959e95a/content
Steinitz, Wolfgang 1950, Ostjakische Grammatik und Chrestomatie mit Wörterverzeichnis, Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112640142
Thompson, Chad L. 1994, Passive and Inverse Constructions. — Voice and Inversion, Amsterdam—Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 47—63.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.28.05tho
Virtanen, Susanna 2014, Pragmatic Direct Object Marking in Eastern Mansi. — Linguistics 52:2, 391—413.
https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0067
Zuñiga, Fernando 2006, Deixis and Alignment: Inverse Systems in Indigenous Languages of the Americas, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing (Typological Studies in Language 70).
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.70
Кошкарёва Н. Б. 2002, Коммуникативная парадигма хантыского предложения. — Языки коренных народов Сибири. Вып. 12, Новосибирск, 29—44.
Михайлов, С. К. 2024, Семантика севернохантыйского салиентного артикля: определенность, салиентность и обвиация. — ВЯ, № 1, 7—38.
https://doi.org/10.31857/0373-658X.2024.1.7-38
