In this paper, the problems with the reconstruction of an affricate phoneme *ć and its reflexes in Hungarian are discussed. Proto-Ugric *ć is often reconstructed, but its alleged reflexes in Hungarian show unexplained variation (s, z, cs), and many of the etymologies involve other phonological irregularities. It is troubling that although in some cases Hungarian shows s and Khanty and Mansi *ć, often the reflexes of the affricate show discrepancy, with part of the languages showing regular reflexes of Proto-Uralic *ś. In this paper, the Ugric etymologies suggested in earlier etymological sources are analyzed and new solutions to the problem of Proto-Ugric *ć and its reflexes in Hungarian are suggested. The problems is also related to the study of the reflexes of Proto-Uralic *ć in Hungarian.
Abondolo, Daniel 1996, Vowel Rotation in Proto-Uralic. ObUgocentric Evidence, London.
Aikio, Ante 2015, The Finnic ’Secondary e-Stems’ and Proto-Uralic Vocalism. — JSFOu 95, 25—66.
https://doi.org/10.33340/susa.82642
Bakró-Nagy Marianne 2003, Egy inetimologikus hangról. — Ünnepi kötet Honti László tiszteletére, Budapest. 27—45.
Bereczki, Gábor 2013, Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Tscheremissischen (Mari), Wiesbaden.
Csúcs, Sándor 2005, Rekonstruktion der permischen Grundsprache, Budapest.
Csúcs, Sándor & Honti, László & Salánki, Zsuzsa & Varga, Judit 1991, Statistik der uralischen Lautentsprechungen, Budapest.
Holopainen, Sampsa 2019, Indo-Iranian Borrowings in Uralic. Critical Overview of Sound-Substitutions and Distribution Criterion. Doctoral dissertation, Helsinki.
https://doi.org/10.23982/vir.89061
Holopainen, Sampsa 2021, On Some Problems of Ugric Etymology (materials of a presentation at the Uralic Information Centre Talk Series, 24.11.2021).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360361796_On_some_problems_of_Ugric_etymology
Holopainen, Sampsa 2022, On the Development of Vowels in the Ugric Languages and the Problem of Proto-Ugric (handout, International Conference on Historical Linguistics, University of Oxford, 1—5 August, 2022).
https://ugric.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/p_ugric/ICHL25_handout_Holopainen.pdf
Honti, László 1982, Geschichte des obugrischen Vokalismus der ersten Silbe, Budapest.
https://doi.org/10.33339/fuf.109828
Honti László 2017, A magyar és a nyugati ótörök szókészleti kapcsolatairól, Budapest.
Häkkinen, Jaakko 2007, Kantauralin murteutuminen vokaalivastaavuuksien valossa. Pro gradu -tutkimus, Helsinki.
Jalava, Lotta & Grünthal, Riho 2020, Vanhimmat uralilaiset postpositiot kielen muutoksen ilmentäjinä. — Ёмас сымыӈ нэ̄̄кве вō̄ртур э̄̄̄тпост самын патум. Scripta miscellanea in honorem Ulla-Maija Forsberg, Helsinki (MSFOu 275), 112—128.
https://doi.org/10.33341/sus.11.8
Kallio, Petri 2019, Yhteissuomalainen sanasto. https://sanat.csc.fi/w/index.php?title= Luokka:Yhteissuomalainen_sanasto.
Korenchy, Éva 1972, Iranische Lehnwörter in den obugrischen Sprachen, Budapest.
Kövesi Magda 1965, A permi nyelvek ősi képzői, Budapest.
Kümmel, Martin 2007, Konsonantenwandel. Bausteine zu einer Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen für die vergleichende Rekonstruktion, Wiesbaden.
Lehtiranta, Juhani 1989, Yhteissaamelainen sanasto, Helsinki (MSFOu 200).
Liimola, Matti 1973, Obinugrilaisten kielten lainasanojen tutkimusta. — Sananjalka 15, 273—275.
Luobbal Sámmol Sámmol Ánte (Aikio, Ante) 2014, On the Reconstruction of Proto-Mari Vocalism. — Journal of Language Relationship / Вопросы языкового родства 11, 125—157.
https://doi.org/10.31826/jlr-2014-110113
Luobbal Sámmol Sámmol Ánte (Aikio, Ante) 2015, Studies in Uralic Etymology IV: Ob-Ugric Etymologies. — LU LI, 1—20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3176/lu.2015.1.01
Luobbal Sámmol Sámmol Ánte (Aikio, Ante) 2022, Proto-Uralic. — The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, Oxford, 3—27.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0001
Maticsák Sándor 2020, A magyar nyelv eredete és rokonsága, Budapest.
Metsäranta, Niklas 2017, Päivitettyjä permiläisiä etymologioita ja rinnastuksia. — JSFOu 96, 211—241.
https://doi.org/10.33340/susa.70228
Pystynen, Juho 2015, Semivowel Losses and Assimilations, in Finnic and Beyond (presentation in CIFU XII).
https://www.academia.edu/15172786/Semivowel_losses_and_assimilations_in_Finnic_and_beyond
Riese, Timothy 2001, Historische Nominalderivation des Wogulischen, Wien.
Róna-Tas, András & Berta, Árpád 2011, West Old Turkic. Turkic Loanwords in Hungarian, Wiesbaden.
Salminen, Tapani 2002, Problems in the Taxonomy of the Uralic Languages in the Light of Modern Comparative Studies. — Лингвистический беспредел. Cборник статей к 70-летию А. И. Кузнецовой, Москва, 44—45.
Sammallahti, Pekka 1988, Historical Phonology of the Uralic Languages with Special Reference to Samoyed, Ugric and Permic. — The Uralic Languages, Leiden—Boston, 478—554.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004492493_021
Zhivlov, Mikhail 2014, Studies in Uralic Vocalism III. — Journal of Language Relationship / Вопросы языкового родства 12, 113—148.
https://doi.org/10.31826/jlr-2015-120109
Zhivlov, Mikhail 2023, Reconstruction of Proto-Uralic. — The Uralic Languages. Second Edition, London—New York, 117—175.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625096-3
Абaev В. И. 1958, Историко-этимологический словарь осетинского языка I, Москва—Ленинград.
Живлов М. А. 2006a, Реконструкция праобско-угорского вокализма. Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата филологических наук, Moква.
Живлов М. А. 2006b, К вопросу о реконструкции обско-угорского вокализма. — Аспекты компаративистики. Выпуск 2, Moсква, 281—309.
Живлов М. А. 2013, Андроновский арийский язык. — Реликтовые индоевропейские языки Передней и Центральной Азии, Москва, 217—220.
Живлов М. А. 2018, Историческая фонетика и внутренняя классификация уральских языков (presentation at the conference ”XIII традиционные чтения памяти С. А. Старостина”).
https://www.academia.edu/38048089/Историческая_фонетика_и_внутренняя_классификация_уральских_языков
Напольских В. В. 2015, К происхождению названий соли в финно-пермских языках. — LU LI, 161—176.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3176/lu.2015.3.01
