ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1965
 
Linguistica Uralica cover
Linguistica Uralica
ISSN 1736-7506 (Electronic)
ISSN 0868-4731 (Print)
Research article
Two Nominal Clause-Types in Northern Mansi: An Experimental Study of Language Variation; pp. 272–285
PDF | https://doi.org/10.3176/lu.2023.4.04

Authors
Csilla Horváth, Nikolett Mus
Abstract

The paper examines the structure and distribution of two types of ­nominal/adjectival predicates in the Northern Mansi language. A nominative noun or adjective serves as the predicate in one construction. The other predicate type contains a predicate noun or adjective that takes translative case marking. In both ­constructions, the stative-like copula ōl- ’be, exist’ can also appear, though under ­different ­conditions. In the paper we focus on (a) the licensing conditions of the ōl- copula, (b) the ­predicate-subject agreement morphology, and (c) concord within the predicate phrase in both predicates. Our findings demonstrate that the two types exhibit systematic structural differences: the copula ōl- is utilized in the nominative construction in the past, while it must be omitted in the present. The ōl- copula is always obligatory in the translative predicate. The nominative predicate noun/adjective takes the morpheme of the subject agreement in number, and we attested inter- and intra-speaker variation in Number concord in this construction when there is an overt copula in the predicate phrase. The translative-marked nominal/adjectival predicate does not take any inflectional suffix, and agreement that indicates both the person and the number of the subject is marked on the ōl- copula. ­Additionally, we will show that only the translative-type is acceptable in identificational clauses. As a result, the identificational reading/interpretation is where the ­semantic ­division of labor between the two constructions lies. Our data come from fieldwork where Mansi native ­speakers helped us with survey research. Northern Mansi newspaper texts were also used to clarify certain inconsistencies between our findings and the literature.

References

Bakró-Nagy,  Marianne,  Sipőcz,  Katalin,  Skribnik,  Elena  2022, North Mansi. — Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Johanna Laakso, Elena Skribnik (eds.), The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press,  537—564.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767664.003.0029

Chambers,  John Kenneth,  Trudgill,  Peter  1998,  Dialectology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805103

Dryer,  Matthew  S.  2007,  Clause Types. — Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Second edition. Volume I: Clause Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 224—275.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619427.004

Higgins,  Francis  Roger  1979,  The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English, New York—London: Garland.

Horváth,  Csilla  2020,  The Vitality and Revitalisation Attempts of the Mansi Language in Khanty-Mansiysk [PhD thesis], Szeged
http://doktori.bibl.u-szeged.hu/id/eprint/10757/1/Horvath_Csilla_disszertacio.pdf

Kálmán,  Béla  1976,  Chrestomathia Vogulica, Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.

Keresztes,  László  1998,  Mansi. — Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic Languages, London: Routledge, 387—427.

Mikkelsen,  Line  2004,  Specifying Who: On the Structure, Meaning and Use of Specificational Copula Constructions [PhD thesis], University of California, Santa Cruz.

Payne,  Thomas  E.  1997,  Describing Morphosyntax, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805066

Pereltsvaig,  Asya  2001,  On the Nature of the Intra-Clausal Relations: A Study of Copular Sentences in Russian and Italian [Dissertation], McGill University, Montréal.

Riese,  Timothy  2001,  Vogul, Munich: Lincom Europa.

Roy,  Isabelle  2005,  Predicate Nominals in Eventive Copular Sentences. — ASJU. International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philosophy 39-2, 213—235.

Sipőcz,  Katalin  2015,  Negation in Mansi. — Matti Miestamo, Anne Tamm, Beáta Wagner-Nagy (eds.), Negation in Uralic Languages, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 191—218.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.108.07sip

Sipőcz,  Katalin  2015,  2017,  The Essive-Translative in Mansi. — Casper de Groot (ed.), Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 379—395.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.16sip

Virtanen,  Susanna,  Horváth,  Csilla  2023,  Mansi. — Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic ­Languages. 2nd edition, London: Routledge, 665—702.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315625096-15

Ромбандеева  Е.  И.,  Вахрушева  М.  П.  1984,  Мансийский язык, Ленинград: Просвещение. 

Скрибник  Е.  К.,  1990  К описанию системы моделей простого предложения в мансийском языке: предложения с именным сказуемым. — М. И. Черемисина, Е. И. Убрятова (eds.), Системность на разных уровнях языка, Новосибирск: АН СССР Сибирское отделение, 95—125.

Скрибник  Е.  К.,  Афанасьева  К.  В.  2007,  Практический курс ман­сийского языка, Ханты-Мансийск.

Back to Issue