The paper examines the semantics and distribution of the polyfunctional Hill Mari focus particle =ok. We describe two interpretations of =ok possible on a wide range of hosts: the exhaustive use and the counteradditive use; besides, we consider several uses that are only possible with a lexically or semantically conditioned set of entities. We argue that =ok falls into a class of devices with not-at-issue exhaustive inferences, along with the English it-cleft and some other cross-linguistic counterparts. We discuss the implications that the Hill Mari data have for the typology of this class of constructions: Hill Mari =ok suggests that discourse givenness of the denotation of the focus constituent is an important dimension along which such elements vary across languages. Besides, in this paper we draw an areal comparison of the Hill Mari =ok with its counterparts in the Volga-Kama languages: Meadow Mari, Chuvash, Tatar, Bashkir, and Udmurt. Although the origin and the general set of readings are the same, the syntactic behavior of =ok’s counterparts varies significantly.
Atlas, Jay D., Levinson, Stephen C. 1981, It-Clefts, Informativeness and Logical Form: Radical Pragmatics (Revised Standard Version). - Radical Pragmatics, New York, 1-62.
Agyagási, Klára 2012, Language Contact in the Volga-Kama Area. - The Szeged Conference. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics Held on August 20-22, 2010, Szeged (Studia Uralo-Altaica 49), 21–37.
Alhoniemi, Alho 1993, Grammatik des Tscheremissischen (Mari). Mit Texten und Glossar, Hamburg.
Beke, Ödön 1914-1915, Türkische Einflüsse in der Syntax finnisch-ugrischer Sprachen. - Keleti Szemle 15, 1-77.
Branan, Kenyon, Erlewine, Michael Y. 2022, Anti-pied-piping. - Manuscript. Leibniz Center for General Linguistics and the National University of Singapore.
Büring, Daniel 2003, On D-Trees, Beans, and B-Accents. - Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (5), 511-545.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025887707652
Büring, Daniel 2014, (Contrastive) Topic. - Handbook of Information Structure, Oxford, 64-85.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.002
Büring, Daniel, Križ, Manuel 2013, It’s That, and That’s It! Exhaustivity and Homogeneity Presuppositions in Clefts (and Definites). - Semantics and Pragmatics. Volume 6, Article 6, 1-29.
https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.6.6
Coppock, Elizabeth, Beaver, David 2014, Principles of the Exclusive Muddle. - Journal of Semantics 31 (3), 371-432.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/fft007
É. Kiss, Katalin 1998, Identificational Focus versus Information Focus. - Language 74 (2), 245—273.
https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0211
Erdal, M. 2004, A Grammar of Old Turkic. T. 3, Leiden.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047403968
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka, New, Keely 2021, A Variably Exhaustive and Scalar Focus Particle and Pragmatic Focus Concord in Burmese. - Semantics and Pragmatics. Volume 14, Article 7, 1-54.
https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.14.7
Forker, Diana 2015, Towards a Semantic Map for Intensifying Particles: Evidence from Avar. - STUF - Language Typology and Universals 68 (4), 485-513.
https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2015-0021
Gast, Volker, van der Auwera, Johan 2011, Scalar Additive Operators in the Languages of Europe. - Language, 87 (1), 2-54.
https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2011.0008
Georgieva, Ekaterina, Salzmann, Martin, Weisser, Philip 2021, Negative Verb Clusters in Mari and Udmurt and Why They Require Postsyntactic Top-Down Word-Formation. - Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 39, 2457-2503.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-020-09484-w
Grossman, Eitan, Polis, Stéphane 2017, Polysemy Networks in Language Contact. The Borrowing of the Greek-Origin Preposition κατά (kata) in Coptic. - Greek Influence on Egyptian-Coptic, Hamburg, 229-262.
Haspelmath, Martin 2021, Structural, Evolutionary and Biocognitive Explanations Are Mutually Compatible. Talk Presented at Center of Linguistic Sciences of Beijing Normal University. Beijing. 2021-04-30.
https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4729584
Helimski, Evgeny 2003, Areal Groupings (Sprachbünde) within and across the Borders of the Uralic Language Family. A Survey. - NyK 100, 156-167.
Hoeksema, Jack 1983, Negative Polarity and the Comparative. - Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1 (3), 403-434.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142472
Höhle, Tilman N. 1992, Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. - Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Wiesbaden, 112-141.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12176-3_5
Horn, Laurence 1981, Exhaustiveness and the Semantics of Clefts. - Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS) 11, Amherst, 125-142.
Johanson, Lars 2000, Linguistic Convergence in the Volga Area. - Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 28, 165-178.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004488472_016
Kadmon, Nirit, Landman, Fred 1993, Any. - Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 353-422.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985272
Klumpp, Gerson 2022, Kamas bāzoʔ ’again’. - Siberica et Uralica. In memoriam Eugen Helimski, Szeged (Studia Uralo-altaica 56), 241-258.
https://doi.org/10.14232/sua.2022.56.241-258
Krifka, Manfred 1992, A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions. - Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Wiebaden, 17-53.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12176-3_2
Krifka, Manfred 1995, The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polarity Items. - Linguistic Analysis 25, 209-257.
König, Ekkehard 1991, The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective, London.
König, Ekkehard, Gast, Volker 2006, Focused Assertion of Identity: A Typology of Intensifiers. - Linguistic Typology 10 (2), 223-276.
https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2006.008
Kratzer, Angelika 2007, Situations in Natural Language Semantics. - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/situations-semantics
Kučerová, Ivona 2012, Grammatical Marking of Givenness. - Natural Language Semantics 20, 1-30.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-011-9073-y
Leech, Geoff, Rayson, Paul, Wilson, Andrew 2001, Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English Based on the British National Corpus, London.
Magomedova, P. A., Alisultanova, M. A. 2010, Dunjalla baχunnirsːi χalgiltɬol gwanabol gwanab mits’ːillasːol muχal, Makhachkala.
Paducheva, E. V. 1987, La particule že. Semantique, syntaxe et prosodie. - Les particules énonciatives en russe contemporain 3, Paris, 11—44.
Roberts, C., 2012, Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics. - Semantics & Pragmatics 5 (6), 1-69.
https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.6
Rooth, Mats Edward 1985, Association with Focus. Ph. D. Thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Rooth, Mats Edward 1992, A Theory of Focus Interpretation. - Natural Language Semantics 1 (1), 75-116.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617
Şahin, Erdal 2009, Tatar türkçesinde uk/ük kuvvetlendirme edati. - Turk Dunyasi Arastirmalari 180, 203-214
Schwarzschild, Roger 1999, Givenness, Avoid-F and Other Constraints on the Placement of Accent. - Natural Language Semantics 7, 141-177.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008370902407
Sebeok, Thomas A., Ingemann, Frances J. 1961, An Eastern Cheremis Manual, Bloomington (UAS 5).
Simonenko, Alexandra 2014, Microvariation in Finno-Ugric Possessive Markers. - Proceedings of the Forty-Third Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 43). Volume Two, Charleston, 127-140.
Simonenko, Alexandra, Carlier, Anne 2020, Givenness Marking in a Mixed System: Constituent Order vs. Determiners. - Quantification and Scales in Change, Berlin, 199-228.
Szabolcsi, Anna 1981, Compositionality in Focus. - Acta Linguistica. Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae (15), 141—162.
https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1981.15.1-2.141
Velleman, Dan B., Beaver, David, Destruel, Emilie, Bumford, Dylan, Onea, Edgar, Coppock, Liz 2012, It-Clefts are IT (Inquiry Terminating) Constructions. - Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 22, 441-460.
https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v22i0.2640
Wichmann, Yrjö 1903, Die tschuwassischen Lehnwörter in den permischen Sprachen, Helsingfors (MSFOu XXI).
Wichmann, Yrjö, Korhonen, Mikko, Uotila, Toivo Emil 1987, Wotjakischer Wortschatz, Helsinki (LSFU XXI).
Winkler, Eberhard 2001, Udmurt, München
Zwicky, Arnold 1985, Heads. - Journal of Linguistics 21, 1-30.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010008
Баскаков Н. А. 1975, Грамматика хакасского языка, Москва.
Галкин И. С. 1964, Историческая грамматика марийского языка. Морфология. Ч. I, Йошкар-Ола.
Егоров В. Г. 1957, Материалы по грамматике современного чувашского языка. Ч. 1. Морфология, Чебоксары.
Закирова А. Н. 2019, Частицы эмфатической идентичности в поволжском языковом союзе. Магистерская диссертация, НИУ ВШЭ.
Закирова А. Н. 2023, Частица =OK в языках Поволжья: история заимствования. - Ежегодник финно-угорских исследований 17 (1), 39-51.
Кашкин Е. В., Сидорова М. А., Мордашова Д. Д., Гарейшина А. Р., Учитель И. К. 2018, Всё =ok: о семантике одной горномарийской энклитики. - Малые языки в большой лингвистике. Сборник трудов конференции 2017, Москва, 83-90.
Козлов А. А. 2017, Горномарийская частица =ok и грани эмфатической идентичности. - Материалы международной конференции «Типология морфосинтаксических параметров 2017», Москва (Типология морфосинтаксических параметров. Вып. 4), 240-254.
Козлов А. А. 2020, Именно. — ВАПросы языкознания. Мегасборник наностатей. Сборник статей к юбилею В. А. Плунгяна, Москва, 35—41.
Люкина Н. М. 2008, Особенности языка балезинских и юкаменских бесермян (сравнительная характеристика). Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата филологических наук, Ижевск.
Падучева Е. В. 2018, Эгоцентрические единицы языка, Москва.
Пенгитов Н. Т. 1961, Современный марийский язык. Морфология, Йошкар-Ола.
Плешак П. С. 2017, Морфосинтаксис именной группы в мокшанском и горномарийском языках. Дипломная работа магистра. Московский государственный университет, Москва.
Плешак П. С., Хомченкова И. А. 2019, Переключение кодов как контекст контрастивности в горномарийском языке. - Томский журнал лингвистических и антропологических исследований 1, 56—68.
https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6119-2019-1-56-68
Саваткова А. А. 2002, Горное наречие марийского языка, Savariae (Bibliotheca Ceremissica. Tomus V).
Серебренников Б. А. 1960, Категория времени и вида в финно-угорских языках пермской и волжской групп, Москва.
Татарская грамматика. Т. 2. Морфология, Казань 1993.
Федотов М. Р. 1990, Чувашско-марийские языковые взаимосвязи, Саранск.
Щербак А. М. 1962, Грамматика староузбекского языка. Москва-Ленинград.
Юлдашев А. А. 1981, Грамматика современного башкирского литературного языка, Москва.
