There are numerous exceptional similarities between some of the east- and southward Finnic languages and Permic languages, in particular in case of the Veps, South-Estonian and Komi languages. The Livonian negative expresses the person and tense by the forms of the negative auxiliary, and the number by the forms of the main verb. The same principle is applied also in the Komi (and Udmurt) language. The manner of the formation of the Veps negative is principally similar to that in Livonian and Komi. The object of the Livonian imperative both in the affirmative and negative may take the genitive form. The genitive could have been the object case from the very beginning in Mordvin (and in Finnic). In certain cases in Baltic and (East-)Slavic languages objects are used in the genitive. It is possible to figure out the formation of the present-day usage of cases of the partial and full objects in Baltic and (East)-Slavic of influence of Finnic- and Mordvin-type languages.
Hausenberg, A.-R. 1996, Onko komin ja itämerensuomalaisissa kielissä areaalisia yhteispiirteitä? - CIFU VIII. Pars IV, 180-182.
Hausenberg, A.-R. 2001, Kadunud lüli Kirde-Euroopa keeleahelas. - CIFU IX. Pars IV, 314-319.
Joki, A. J. 1957, Eine Untersuchung über das Objekt in den uralischen Sprachen. - FUF 32. Anzeiger, 1-41.
Klaas, B. 1996, Similarities in Case Marking of Syntactic Relations in Estonian and Lithuanian. - Estonian: Typological Studies 1, Tartu (Tartu Ülikooli eesti keele õppetooli toimetised 4), 37-67.
Künnap, A. 1997, Uralilaisten kielten läntinen kontaktikenttä. - Itämerensuomi - eurooppalainen maa, Oulu (Studia Historica Fenno-Ugrica 2), 63-74.
Künnap, A. 2000, Contact-Induced Perspectives in Uralic Linguistics, [München-Newcastle] (LINCOM Studies in Asian Linguitics 39).
Künnap, A. 2001, On Some Peculiarities of the Estonian Language. - Estonian: Typological Studies V, Tartu (Tartu Ülikooli eesti keele õppetooli toimetised 18), 123-137.
Suhonen, S. 2001, Itämeren alueen kieliareaaleja. - Ünnepi könyv Keresztes László tiszteletére, Debrecen-Jyväskylä (Folia Uralica Debreceniensia 8), 569-580.
Thomason, S. G., Kaufman, T. 1988, Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London.
https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520912793
Wickman, B. 1955, The Form of the Object in the Uralic Languages, Uppsala.
Wälchli, B. 2000, Livonian in a Genetic, Areal and Typological Perspective, or is Finnish Better Finnic than Livonian? - Facing Finnic. Some Challenges to Historical and Contact Linguistics, Helsinki (Castrenianumin toimitteita 59), 210-226.
Wiedemann, F. J. 1865, Grammatik der Ersa-mordwinischen Sprache, St. Petersburg.
Kont, K. 1967, O partitive v finno-ugorskih jazykah. - SFU III, 1-6.
Tkačenko O. B. 1989, Očerki teorii jazykovogo substrata, Kiev.
