ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
cover
Estonian Journal of Ecology
The first experience of livestock guarding dogs preventing large carnivore damages in Finland; pp. 216–224
PDF | doi: 10.3176/eco.2009.3.06

Authors
Teet Otstavel, Kristiina A. Vuori, David E. Sims, Anna Valros, Outi Vainio, Hannu Saloniemi
Abstract
Livestock guarding dogs (LGDs) have been for millennia an effective means of protecting rangeland, i.e. cattle or sheep, from predators in Central and Southern Europe and Asia. In contrast, there is no LGD tradition or local breeds in the Nordic countries. The objective of this study was to collect descriptive information about the experiences of LGDs in Finland acquired by early farm adopters through semi-structured interviews, narratives, and on-site visits to farms. The experiences were encouraging: no predation was observed since LGD(s) presence. The presence of LGDs had multi­functional character by increasing the feeling of security. Unlike in Norway the farmers in Finland did not describe high costs or serious difficulties in relationships with guarded animals, herding dogs, other animals, or village neighbourhoods.
References

Black, H. L. & Green, J. S. 1985. Navajo use of mixed-breed dogs for management of predators.
J. Range Manage., 38, 11–15.
doi:10.2307/3899323

Boitani, L. 2000. Action plan for the conservation of wolves in Europe (Canis lupus). Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats (Bern Convention). Nature Environ., 113. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg.

Bisi, J. & Kurki, S. 2008. The wolf debate in Finland. Expectations and objectives for the management of the wolf population at regional and national level. Publications, 12. University of Helsinki.

Bowman, J. L., Leopold, B. D., Vilella, F. J. & Gill, D. A. 2004. A spatially explicit model, derived from demographic variables, to predict attitudes toward black bear restoration. J. Wildlife Manage., 68(2), 223–232.
doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0223:ASEMDF]2.0.CO;2

Breitenmoser, U. 1998. Large predators in the Alps: the fall and rise of man’s competitors. Biol. Conserv., 83, 279–289.
doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00084-0

Coppinger, L. 1992. Sheepdog environments in the Old World. Dog Log. Livestock Guard Dog Association, 2, 12–14.

Coppinger, R., Lorenz, J. & Coppinger, L. 1983. Introducing livestock guarding dogs to sheep
and goat producers. In Proceedings of First Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference (Decker, D. J., ed.), pp. 129–132. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

Dawydiak, O. & Sims, D. 2004. Livestock Protection Dogs – Selection, Care and Training. 2nd edn. Alpine Blue Ribbon Books, Loveland, Colorado.

Green, J. S. & Woodruff, R. A. 1983a. The use of Eurasian dogs to protect sheep from predators
in North America: a summary of research at the U.S. Sheep Experiment Station. In
Proceedings of First Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference (Decker, D. J., ed.), pp. 119–124. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

Green, J. S. & Woodruff, R. A. 1983b. The use of three breeds of dog to protect rangeland sheep from predators. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 11, 141–161.
doi:10.1016/0304-3762(83)90123-2

Hansen, I. 2005. Use of livestock guarding dogs in Norway – a review of the effectiveness of different methods. Carnivore Damage Prevention News, 8, 02-08.

Hansen, I. H. & Smith, M. E. 1999. Livestock-guarding dogs in Norway. Part II: Different working regimes. J. Range Manage., 52, 312–316.
doi:10.2307/4003539

Kojola, I., Määttä, E. & Hiltunen, H. 2006. Suurpetojen lukumäärä ja lisääntyminen vuonna 2005. Riistantutkimuksen tiedote, 208, 1–5.

Koljonen, K. 2002. Laumanvartijakoirat. Sanasilta Oy, Vantaa.

Levin, M. 2005. Livestock guarding dogs in Sweden: a preliminary report. Carnivore Damage Prevention News, 8, 08-09.

Linhart, S. B., Sterner, R. T., Carrigan, T. C. & Henne, D. R. 1979. Komondor guard dogs reduce sheep losses to coyotes: a preliminary evaluation. J. Range Manage., 32, 238–241.
doi:10.2307/3897131

Mattson, D. J., Byrd, K. L., Rutherford, M. B., Brown, S. R. & Clark, T. W. 2006. Finding common ground in large carnivore conservation: mapping contending perspectives. Environ. Sci. Policy, 9, 392–405.
doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.01.005

McGrew, J. C. & Blakesley, C. S. 1982. How Komondor dogs reduce sheep losses to coyotes.
J. Range Manage., 35, 693–696.
doi:10.2307/3898240

Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 2005. Management Plan for the Wolf Population in Finland. Publications, 11.

Nilsen, P. A., Hansen, I. & Christansen, F. 2003. Tilpasset bruk av vokterhund – erfaringer fra enkeltbesetninger 2000–2002. Planteforsk Grønn kunnskap., 7(6), 1–38 (in Norwegian with English summary).

Nylander, E. & Ahvonen, A. 2007. Petoeläinvahingot Suomessa vuonna 2005. Julkaisut. Riista- ja kalatalouden tutkimuslaitos.

Rigg, R. 2001. Livestock guarding dogs: their current use world wide. IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group Occasional Paper No 1 [online] URL: http://www.canids.org/occasionalpapers/ (accessed 12 June 2008).

Rigg, R. 2004. The extent of predation on livestock by large carnivores in Slovakia and mitigating carnivore–human conflict using livestock guarding dogs. MSc Thesis. University of Aberdeen.

RKTL. 2007. http://www.rktl.fi/riista/riistavarat/suurpedot_vuonna_2006/

Woodroffe, R. 2000. Predators and people: using human densities to interpret declines of large carnivores. Animal Conserv., 3, 165–173.
doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00241.x

Back to Issue

Back issues