ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1997
 
TRAMES cover
TRAMES. A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
ISSN 1736-7514 (Electronic)
ISSN 1406-0922 (Print)
Impact Factor (2022): 0.2
THEY ONLY TEACH US WORD AND EXCEL!; pp. 53–69
PDF | https//doi.org/10.3176/tr.2020.1.03

Authors
Eneli Kindsiko, Anne Aidla, Helen Poltimäe, Kulno Türk
Abstract

There is a considerable shortage of females interested in becoming ICT specialists, and the roots of this disinterest can be traced back to the schooling. A sample of 291 high school seniors from 5 different schools in Estonia were surveyed about their future study choices and perceived influences on those choices. The findings indicate that there is a crucial need to systematically upgrade the level of obligatory computer classes (pedagogical lag), as the classroom experience is a key factor that shapes career-related decisions among young women. We claim that merely offering one-off initiatives (computer camps and summer schools) is not enough, but obligatory computer classes should keep pace with ICT developments in society.

References

Abbiss, Jane (2009) “Gendering the ICT curriculum: the paradox of choice”. Computers and Education 53, 2, 343–354.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.011

Abbiss, Jane (2011) “Boys and machines: gendered computer identities, regulation and resistance”. Gender and Education 23, 5, 601–617.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2010.549108

Anderson, Neil, Colin Lankshear, Carolyn Timms, and Lyn Courtney (2008) “Because it’s boring, irrelevant and I don’t like computers: why high school girls avoid professionally-oriented ICT subjects”. Computers and Education 50, 4, 1304–1318.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.003

Aukrust, Vibeke G. (2008) “Boys’ and girls’ conversational participation across four grade levels in Norwegian classrooms: taking the floor or being given the floor?”. Gender and Education 20, 3, 237–252.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802000413

Bandura, Albert (1993) “Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning”. Educational Psychologist 28, 2, 117–148.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

Bandura, Albert (1999) “Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective”. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2, 21–41.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00024

Bandura, Albert, Claudio Barbaranelli, Gian V. Caprara, and Concetta Pastorelli (2001) “Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories”. Child Development 72, 1, 187–206.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00273

Beyer, Sylvia (2014) “Why are women underrepresented in computer science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades”. Computer Science Education 24, 2-3, 153–192.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.963363

Cheryan, Sapna, Allison Master, and Andrew N. Meltzoff (2015) “Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes”. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049

Craig, Annemieke, Catherine Lang, and Julie Fisher (2008) “twenty years of girls into computing days: has it been worth the effort?”. Journal of Information Technology Education 7, 339–353.
https://doi.org/10.28945/193

Denner, Jill (2011) “What predicts middle school girls’ interest in computing?” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 3, 1, 53–69.

Dick, Thomas P. and Sharon F. Rallis (1991) “Factors and influences on high school students’ career choices”. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22, 4, 281–292.
https://doi.org/10.2307/749273

Fennema, Elizabeth, Thomas P. Carpenter, Victoria R. Jacobs, Megan L. Franke, and Linda W. Levi (1998) “A longitudinal study of gender differences in young children’s mathematical thinking”. Educational Researcher 27, 5, 6–11.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027005006
https://doi.org/10.2307/1176733

Gannon, Susanne (2008) “Twenty-four seven on the computers: girls, ICTs and risk”. Gender and Education 20, 4, 361–373.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802190198

Gati, Itamar and Noa Saka (2001) “High school students’ career-related decision-making difficulties”. Journal of Counselling and Development 79, 75–84.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01978.x

Gil-Flores, Javier, Javier Rodríguez-Santero, and Juan-Jesus Torres-Gordillo (2017) “Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: the role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure”. Computers in Human Behavior 68, 441–449.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.057

Gunderson, Elizabeth A., Gerardo Ramirez, Susan C. Levine, and Sian L. Beilock (2012) “The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes”. Sex Roles 66, 3-4, 153–166.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2

Gunnarsson, Karin (2019) “In the middle of things: encountering questions about equality in social studies education”. Gender and Education.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.1583321

Hur, Jung Won, Care E. Andrzejewski, and Daniela Marghitu (2017) “Girls and computer science: experiences, perceptions, and career aspirations“. Computer Science Education 27, 2, 100–120.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1376385

Kindsiko, Eneli and Kulno Türk (2017) “Detecting major misconceptions about employment in ICT: a study of the myths about ICT work among females”. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 11, 1, 107–114.

Lakanen, Antti-Jussi and Tommi Kärkkäinen (2019) “Identifying pathways to computer science: the long-term impact of short-term game programming outreach interventions”. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 19, 3, 1–30.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3283070

Lang, Catherine (2010) “Happenstance and compromise: a gendered analysis of students’ computing degree course selection”. Computer Science Education 20, 317–345.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2010.527699

Lang, Catherine, Julie Fisher, Annemieke Craig, and Helen Forgasz (2015) “Outreach programmes to attract girls into computing: how the best laid plans can sometimes fail”. Computer Science Education 25, 3, 257–275.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1067008

Master, Allison, Sapna Cheryan, and Andrew N. Meltzoff (2016) “Computing whether she belongs: stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science”. Journal of Educational Psychology 108, 3, 424–437.
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061

Schumacher, Phyllis and Janet Morahan-Martin (2001) “Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experiences”. Computers in Human Behavior 17, 95–110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00032-7

Sumpter, Lovisa (2016) “Boys press all the buttons and hope it will help’: upper secondary school teachers’ gendered conceptions about students’ mathematical reasoning”. International Journal of Science and Math Education 14, 1535–1552.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9660-3

Tsouroufli, Maria (2002) “Gender and teachers’ classroom practice in a secondary school in Greece”. Gender and Education 14, 2, 135–147.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250220133996

Vekiri, Ioanna (2010) “Boys’ and girls’ ICT beliefs: do teachers matter?”. Computers and Education 55, 16–23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.013

Watson, Penelope W. St. J., Christine M. Rubie-Davies, Kane Meissel, Elizabeth R. Peterson, Annaline Flint, Lynda Garrett, and Lyn McDonald (2017) “Teacher gender, and expectation of reading achievement in New Zealand elementary school students: essentially a barrier?”. Gender and Education 31:8, 1000-1019. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2017.1410108
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1410108

Wolfe, Melissa J. (2019) “Smart girls traversing assemblages of gender and class in Australian secondary mathematics classrooms”. Gender and Education 31, 2, 205–221.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1302078

Back to Issue