ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1997
 
TRAMES cover
TRAMES. A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
ISSN 1736-7514 (Electronic)
ISSN 1406-0922 (Print)
Impact Factor (2022): 0.2
WHY WAS EMIL KRAEPELIN NOT RECOGNIZED AS A PSYCHOLOGIST?; pp. 369–391
PDF | DOI: 10.3176/tr.2016.4.04

Author
Jüri Allik
Abstract

According to a dominant view, Emil Kraepelin (1856–1926) was the founder of modern psychiatry, but his contribution to the history of experimental psychology was insignificant. This interpretation contradicts Kraepelin’s own view during his stay in Tartu (1886–1891) because at that time he was more interested in psychology than in his not very satisfying clinical work. He also considered his research on the work curve to be his chief scientific contribution, not the distinction between schizophrenia and affective psychoses which is still valid in the modern classifications of mental disorders. In this paper, I analyse Kraepelin and his students’ contribution to four fields of psychology: pharmacopsychology, individual differences, sleep studies, and the work curve. In each of these four areas, Kraepelin and his students made important and pioneering contributions which, although initially recognized by contemporaries, were later gradually forgotten by more recent generation of researchers. I argue that the lack of recognition of Kraepelin’s psychological studies is unjustified because he, together with many of his associates, created these four branches of psychology, very much as Hermann Ebbinghaus created the experimental study of memory and Oswald Külpe created the experimental study of thinking.

References

Allik, J. (2007)“History of experimental psychology from an Estonian perspective”. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung 71, 6, 618–625. doi: 10.1007/s00426-006-0051-9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0051-9

Allport, G. W. (1966) “Traits revisited”. American Psychologist 21, 1, 1–10. doi: 10.1037/h0023295
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023295

Allport, G. W., and H. S. Odbert (1936) “Trait-names: a psycho-lexical study”. Psychological Monographs 47, 211.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360

Ballard, P. B. (1913) “Obliviscence and reminiscence”. British Journal of Psychology, Monograph Supplement 1, 2.

Baumeister, R. F. and J. Tierney (2011) Willpower: Rediscovering the greatest human strength. New York: Penguin Press.

Baumeister, R. F., K. D. Vohs, and D. M. Tice (2007) “The strength model of self-control”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16, 6, 351–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x

Becker, K., H. Steinberg, and M. Kluge (2016) “Emil Kraepelin’s concepts of the phenomenology and physiology of sleep: the first systematic description of chronotypes”. Sleep Medicine 27, 9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2015.06.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2015.06.001

Berrios, G. E. and M. Gili (1995) “Will and its disorders: a conceptual history”. History of Psychiatry 6, 21, 87–104. doi: 10.1177/0957154x9500602105
https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X9500602105

Bilodeau, E. A. (1966) Acquisition of skill. Oxford: Academic Press.

Binet, A., and V. Henri (1895) “La psychologie individuelle”. L’année psychologique 2, 1, 411–465.
https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.1895.1541

Binet, A., and Th. Simon (1904) “Méthodes nouvelles pour le diagnostic du niveau intellectuel des anormaux”. l’Année psychologique 11, 191–244.
https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.1904.3675

Boring, E. G. (1929/1957) A history of experimental psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Brennan, J. F. (1994) History and systems of psychology. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Brett, G. S. (1921) A history of psychology. Vol. 3: Modern psychology. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Cattell, J. M. (1890) “Mental tests and measurements”. Mind 15, 373–381.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/os-XV.59.373

Cicciola, E., R. Foschi, and G. P. Lombardo (2014) “Making up intelligence scales: De Sanctis’s and Binet’s tests, 1905 and after”. History of Psychology 17, 3, 223–236. doi: 10.1037/a0033740
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033740

Clark, L. A. (1993) The schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality (SNAP). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Costall, A. (1999) “Dire straits: the divisive legacy of the 1898 Cambridge anthropological expedition”. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 35, 4, 345–358. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6696(199923)35:4<345::aid-jhbs2>3.0.co;2-j
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6696(199923)35:4<345::AID-JHBS2>3.0.CO;2-J

Cronbach, L. J. (1957) “Two disciplines of scientific psychology”. American Psychologists, 12, 671–684.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043943

Decker, H. S. (2004) “The psychiatric works of Emil Kraepelin: a many-faceted story of modern medicine”. Journal of the history of the neurosciences, 13, 3, 248–276. doi: 10.1080/09647040490510470
https://doi.org/10.1080/09647040490510470

Ebbinghaus, H. (1891) “C. Higier: Experimentelle Prüfung der psychophysischen Methoden im Bereich des Raumsinns der Netzhaut. Dissertation. Dorpat, Schnakenburgs Buchdruckerei 1890, 124 S.”Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane2, 449–452.

Ebbinghaus, H. (1893) “E. Michelson: Untersuchungen über die Tiefe des Schlafes. Dissertation, Dorpat 1891”. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 4, 427–428.

Engstrom, E. J., W. Burgmair, and M. M. Weber (2002) “Emil Kraepelin’s ‘Self-Assessment’: clinical autography in historical context”. History of Psychiatry 13, 49, 089–098. doi: 10.1177/0957154x0201304905
https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X0201304905

Engstrom, E. J. and K. S. Kendler (2015) “Emil Kraepelin: icon and reality”. American Journal of Psychiatry 27, 1, 1190–1196. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15050665
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15050665

Esper, E. A. (1964) A history of psychology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

Eysenck, H. J. and C. D. Frith (1977) Kraepelin and the Age of Innocence. In H. J. Eysenck and C. D. Frith, eds. Reminiscence, motivation, and personality: a case study in experimental psychology, 3–35. New York: Plenum Press.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2244-3_1

Gailliot, M. T. and R. F. Baumeister (2007) “The physiology of willpower: linking blood glucose to self-control”. Personality and Social Psychology Review 11, 4, 303–327. doi: 10.1177/1088868307303030
https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307303030

Gailliot, M. T., R. F. Baumeister, C. N. DeWall, J. K. Maner, E. A. Plant, D. M. Tice, and B. J. Schmeichel (2007) “Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: willpower is more than a metaphor”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92, 2, 325–336. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.325
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.325

Galton, F. (1879) “Psychometric experiments”. Mind 2, 149–162.
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/2.2.149

Galton, F. (1883) Inquiries into human faculty and its development. London: Macmillan.
https://doi.org/10.1037/14178-000

Goddard, H. H. (1912) “Échellemetrique de l’intelligence de Binet-Simon”. l’Année psychologique 1, 288–326.

Good, B. J. (2010) “Emil Kraeplin on pathologies of will”. In K. M. Murphy and C. J. Throop, eds. Toward and anthropology of will, 158–176, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Haggbloom, S. J., R. Warnick, J. E. Warnick, V. K. Jones, G. L. Yarbrough, T. M. Russell, and E. Monte (2002) “The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century”. Review of General Psychology 6, 2, 139–152. doi: 10.1037//1089-2680.6.2.139
https://doi.org/10.1037/14178-000

Healy, D., M. Harris, F. Farquhar, S. Tschinkel, and J. Le Noury (2008) “Historical overview: Kraepelin’s impact on psychiatry”. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuro­science 258, 18–24. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-2008-4

Heerwagen, F. (1889) “Statistische Untersuchungen über Träume und Schlaf”. Philosophische Studien 5, 301–320.

Higier, H. (1892) “Experimentelle Prüfung der psychophysischen Methoden im Bereiche des Raumsinnes der Netzhaut”. Philosophische Studien 7, 232–297.

Hildebrandt, H. (1993) “Der psychologische Versuch in der Psychiatrie: Was wurde aus Kraepelins (1895) Program?”. Psychologie und Geschichte 5, 5–30.

Hoch, A. and E. Kraepelin (1896) “Ueber die Wirkung der Theebestandtheile auf körperliche und geistige Arbeit”. Psychologische Arbeiten 1, 378–488.

Hoff, P. (1994) Emil Kraepelin und die Psychitarie als klinische Wissenschaft. Berlin: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85079-0

Hothersall, D. (1990) History of psychology. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hull, C. L. (1943) Principles of behavior: an introduction to behavior theory. Oxford, England: Appleton-Century.

Hylan, J. P. and E. Kraepelin (1902) “Über die Wirkung kurzer Arbeitszeiten”. Psychologische Arbeiten 4, 3, 454–494.

Jablensky, A. (2007)“Living in a Kraepelinian world: Kraepelin’s impact on modern psychiatry”. History of Psychiatry 18, 3, 381–388. doi: 10.1177/0957154x07079690
https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X07079690

Jensen, A. R. (1998) The g factor: the science of mental ability. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.

John, O. P., A. Angleitner, and F. Ostendorf (1988) “The lexical approach to personality: a historical review of trait taxonomic research”. European Journal of Personality 2, 171–203.
https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410020302

Koppes, L. L. (2007) Historical perspectives in industrial and organizational psychology. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Korn, J. H., R. Davis, and S. F. Davis (1991) “Historians’ and chairpersons’ judgments of eminence among psychologists”. American Psychologist 46, 7, 789–792. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.7.789
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.7.789

Kraepelin, E. (1902) “Arbeitscurve”. Philosophische Studien 19, 459–507.

Kraepelin, E. (1919/1971) Dementia praecox and paraphrenia. Huntington, N.Y.: R. E. Krieger Pub. Co.

Kraepelin, E. (1976) Psychiatrie: ein Lehrbuch für Studi[e]rende und Aerzte. New York: Arno Press.

Kraepelin, E. (1987) Memoirs. Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71924-0

Kraepelin, E., W. Burgmair, E. J. Engstrom, A. Hirschmüller, and M. M. Weber (2003) Kraepelin in Dorpat 1886–1891. München: Belleville.

Käbin, I. (1986) Die medizinische Forschung und Lehrean der Universität Dorat/Tartu 1802–1940. Lüneburg: Nordost-Bibliothek.

Külpe, O. (1890) “Max. Falk: Versuche über die Raumschätzung mit Hilfe von Armbewegungen. Inaug.-Dissertation, Dorpat 1890, 57 S.”. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane1, 357–358.

Leahey, T. H. (1980) A history of psychology: main currents in psychological thought. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963) Structural anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

Markon, K. E., R. F. Krueger, and D. Watson (2005) “Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88, 1, 139–157.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139

Martin, S. A. (2007) “Between Kraepelin and Freud: the integrative psychiatry of August Hoch”. History of Psychiatry 18, 3, 275–299. doi: 10.1177/0957154x06065266
https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X06065266

McGeoch, J. A. and A. L. Irion (1952) The psychology of human learning. New York: Longmans, Green.

Michelson, E. R. (1891) Untersuchungen über die Tiefe des Schlafes. Dorpat: Schnakenburg’s Buchdruckerei.

Michelson, E. R. (1899) “Untersuchungen über die Tiefe des Schlafes”. Psychologische Arbeiten 2, 30–117.

Mosso, A. (1890) “Ueber die Gesetze der Ermüdung: Untersuchungen an Muskeln des Menschen”. Archiv für Physiologie, 89–168. doi: http://vlp.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/pdf/lit5539_Hi.pdf

Müller, U., P. C. Fletcher, and H. Steinberg (2006) „The origin of pharmacopsychology: Emil Kraepelin’s experiments in Leipzig, Dorpat and Heidelberg (1882–1892)”. Psycho­pharmacology 184, 2, 131–138. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0239-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0239-5

Myers, C. R. (1970) “Journal citations and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology”. American Psychologist 25, 11, 1041–1048. doi: 10.1037/h0030149
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030149

Neifeld, M. R. and A. A. Poffenberger (1928) “Mathematical Analysis of Work Curves”. Journal of General Psychology 1, 3–4, 448–459.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1928.9918020

Nicolas, S. and Z. Levine (2012) “Beyond intelligence testing: Remembering Alfred Binet after a century”. European Psychologist 17, 4, 320–325. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000117
https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000117

Oehrn, A. (1889) Experimentelle Studien zur Individualpsychologie. Dorpat: Laakmann.

Oehrn, A. (1895) “Experiment alle Studien zur Individualpsychologie”. Psychologische Arbeiten 1, 92–152.

Osgood, C. E. (1953) Method and theory in experimental psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ramul, K. A. (1974) From the history of psychology /Izistoriipsixologii/. Tartu: Tartu Riiklik Ülikool.

Rivers, W. H. R. and E. Kraepelin (1896) “Ueber Ermüdung und Erholung”. Psychologische Arbeiten 1, 627–678.

Roback, A. A. (1962) History of psychology and psychiatry. London: Vision Press.

Robinson, D. N. (1986) An intellectual history of psychology. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.

Rouse, S. and A. Herle (1998) Cambridge and the Torres Strait: centenary essays on the 1898 anthropological expedition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Saarma, J. and V. Vahing (1976) “Kraepelini psühhofarmakoloogilistest uurimistest Tartus”.[About Kraepelin’s psychopharmacological studies in Tartu.] Nõukogude Eesti Tervishoid 19, 436–440.

Schmied, L. A., H. Steinberg, and E. A. B. Sykes (2006) “Psychopharmacology’s debt to experi­mental psychology”. History of psychology 9, 2, 144–157. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.9.2.144
https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.9.2.144

Sharp, S. E. (1899) “Individual psychology: a study in psychological method”. The American Journal of Psychology 10, 3, 329–391.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1412140

Spearman, C. (1904) “‘General intelligence,’ objectively determined and measured”. American Journal of Psychology 15, 201–293.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107

Steinberg, H. and M. C. Angermeyer (2001) “Emil Kraepelin’s years at Dorpat as professor of psychiatry in nineteenth-century Russia”. History of Psychiatry 12, 47, 297–327. doi: 10.1177/0957154x0101204703
https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X0101204703

Terman, L. M. (1916) The measurement of intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
https://doi.org/10.1037/10014-000

Thorndike, E. L. (1912) “The curve of work”. Psychological Review 19, 3, 165–194. doi: 10.1037/h0073541
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073541

Thurstone, L. L. (1931) “Multiple factor analysis”. Psychological Review 38,5, 406–427. doi: 10.1037/h0069792
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0069792

Todes, D. P. (2014) Ivan Pavlov: a Russian life in science. New York: Oxford University Press.

Vahing, V. and L. Mehilane (1990) “Zu experimentell-psychologischen und psychopharmako­logischen Forschungen von Emil Kraepelin in Tartu“. Acta et commentationes Universitatis Tartuensis 895, 3–14.

Varon, E. J. (1935) “The development of Alfred Binet’s psychology”. Psychological Monographs 46, 3.i–129. doi: 10.1037/h0093362
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093362

Varon, E. J. (1936) “Alfred Binet’s concept of intelligence”. Psychological Review 43, 1, 32–58. doi: 10.1037/h0060709
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060709

Watson, D., L. A. Clark, and M. Chmielewski (2008) “Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology: II. Further articulation of a comprehensive unified trait structure”. Journal of Personality 76, 6, 1545–1585. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00531.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00531.x

Weber, M. M. and W. Burgmair (2009) “The assistant’s bedroom served as a laboratory: docu­mentation in 1888 of within sleep periodicity by the psychiatrist Eduard Robert Michelson”. Sleep Medicine 10, 3, 378–384. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.03.016
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2008.03.016

Wolf, T. H. (1964) “Alfred Binet: a time of crisis”. American Psychologist 19, 9, 762–771. doi: 10.1037/h0046878
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046878

Woodworth, R. S. and M. R. Sheehan (1964) Contemporary schools of psychology. 3rd ed. New York: The Ronald Press.

Back to Issue