ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1997
 
TRAMES cover
TRAMES. A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
ISSN 1736-7514 (Electronic)
ISSN 1406-0922 (Print)
Impact Factor (2022): 0.2
HOW TO COMMUNICATE WITH A SPEECH IMPAIRED PERSON? A CASE STUDY OF A SUBJECT WITH MOSAIC PATAU SYNDROME; pp. 243–264
PDF | DOI: 10.3176/tr.2014.3.03

Author
Ingrid Rummo
Abstract

The current article is seeking an answer to the question how to communicate with a specific person with a partial loss of the ability to speak so that all participants of the communicative situation would understand each other. The subject of the study is a female who was born in 1990. Her speech impairment is caused by the mosaic form of Patau syndrome or trisomy of chromosome 13, and developmental verbal dyspraxia. Research material of the article consists of three communication situations recorded in a journal of participant observation; two situations involved a mother and a daughter (the subject of the study), who were joined by a third party in the third situation. The findings reveal that the subject uses in communication motional communication modalities and vocalizations, as well as combinations of these communicative means, manipulation with an object proved to be most effective. Collaboration of the communicators and con­sideration of shared knowledge play an important part. The subject guides her interlocutor to verbalize the meanings which she is unable to express orally herself. The findings of this study have practical implications for communication with other people with partial or total loss of the ability to speak.

References

Agar, Michael (1994) Language shock: understanding the culture of conversation. New York: William Morrow.

Allwood, Jens (2003) “Cooperation and flexibility in multimodal communication”. In Gestures: meaning and use. (Proceedings), 133–141. Monica Rector, Isabella Poggi, and Nadine Trigo, eds. Porto: Universidade Fernando Pessoa.

Aypar, Ebru, M., Selman Yildrim, Ahmet Sert, Ilhan Ciftci, and Dursun Odabas (2011) “A girl with metopic synostosis and trisomy 13 mosaicism: case report and review of the literature”. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A 155, 638–641. Available at <wileyonlinelibrary.com>. Accessed on 07.07.2011.

Balconi, Michela, ed. (2010) Neuropsychology of communication. Milan: Springer Verlag Italia.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1584-5

Balconi, Michela (2010) “Biological basis of linguistic and communicative systems: from neuro­linguistics to neuropragmatics”. In Neuropsychology of communication, 3–27. Michela Balconi, ed. Milan: Springer Verlag Italia.

Baty, B. J., L. B. Jorde, B. L. Blackburn, and J. C. Carey (1994) “Natural history of trisomy 18 and trisomy 13: II. Psychomotor development”. American Journal of Medical Genetics 49, 2, 189–194.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320490205

Brookes, Geoff (2007) Dyspraxia. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing.

Brown, Gillian and George Yule (1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226

Cascella, W. Paul (2005) “Expressive Communication strengths of adults with severe to profound intellectual disabilities as reported by group home staff”. Communication Disorders Quarterly 45, 1, 156–163.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15257401050260030401

Cienki, Alan (2010) “Language as a variably multimodal phenomenon: keynote lecture abstract”. In Gesture: evolution, brain and linguistic structures. 4th Conference of the International Society for Gestures Studies (ISGS), July 25–30, 2010. Abstracts, 37. Frankfurt/Oder: European University Viadrina.

Dewey, Deborah, E. A. Roy, P. A. Square-Storer, and D. Hayden (1988) “Limb and oral praxic abilities of children with verbal sequencing deficits”. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 30, 6, 743–751.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1988.tb14636.x

van Dijk, Teun Adrianus (1997) “The study of discourse”. In Discourse as structure and process. Discourse studies: a multidisciplinary introduction, 1–34. Teun A. van Dijk, ed. London: SAGE Publications.

van Dijk, Teun Adrianus (2005) Ideoloogia: multidistsiplinaarne käsitlus. [Ideology: multi­distciplinary approach.] Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.

Ferguson, Alison (1994) “The influence of aphasia, familiarity and activity on conversational repair”. Aphasiology 8, 143–157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02687039408248647

Field, John (2004) Psycholinguistics: the key concepts. London and New York: Routledge.

Goldstein, Henri and Kim Gjerum Nielsen (1988) “Rates and survival of individuals with trisomy 13 and 18”. Clinical Genetics 34, 366–372.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.1988.tb02894.x

Goodwin, Charles (1995) “Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28, 3, 233–260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4

Goodwin, Charles, ed. (2003) Conversation and brain damage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goodwin, Charles (2003) “Introduction”. In Conversation and brain damage, 3–20. Charles Goodwin, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Griffith, Christopher B., Gail H. Vance, and David D. Weaver (2009) “Phenotypic variability in trisomy 13 mosaicism: two new patients and literature review”. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 149A, 6, 1346–1358.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32883

Hymes, Dell H. (1972) “On communicative competence”. In Sociolinguistics: selected readings, 269–293. J. B. Pride and J. Holmes, eds. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

Jokinen, Kristiina, Silvi Tenjes, and Ingrid Rummo (2013). “Embodied interaction and semiotic categorization: communicative gestures of a girl with Patau syndrome”. In The construal of spatial meaning: windows into conceptual space, 74–97. Carita Paradis, Jean Hudson and Ulf Magnusson, eds. (Explorations in Language and Space, 7.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641635.003.0006

Klippi, Anu (2003) “Collaborating in Aphasic Group Conversation. Striving for Mutual Under­standing”. In Conversation and brain damage, 117–143. Charles Goodwin, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kress, Gunther (2004) “Reading images: multimodality, representation and new media”. In IIID Conference. Expert Forum for Knowledge Presentation: Preparing for the Future of Knowledge Representation. Available online at <http://www.knowledgepresentation.org/ BuildingTheFuture/Kress2/Kress2.html>. Accessed at 19.07. 2011.

Kress, Gunther (2013) Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. USA and Canada: Routledge.

Laakso, Minna (1992) “Interactional features of aphasia therapy conversation”. In Studies in Logopedics and Phonetics 3, 69–90. R. Aulanko and M. Lehtihalmes, eds. Publications of the Department of Phonetics. University of Helsinki, Series B: Phonetics, Logopedics and Speech Communication 4.

Laakso, Minna (2005) “Afaattisten henkilöiden vuorovaikutuksen keskustelunanalyyttinen tutkimus”. Puhe ja kieli 25, 2, 53–64.

Langacker, Ronald (2008) Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001

Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

MacCabe, Colin (1979) “On discourse”. Economy and Society 8, 4, 279–307.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085147900000010

Macdonell, Diane (1986) Theories of discourse: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

Magenis, R. Ellen, Frederic Hecht, and Samuel Milham (1968) “Trisomy 13 (D1) syndrome: Studies on parental age, sex ratio, and survival”. The Journal of Pediatrics 73, 2, 222–228.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(68)80072-1

McNeill, David (1992) Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Morgan, Angela T. and Adam P. Vogel (2009) “A Cochrane review of treatment for childhood apraxia of speech”. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 45, 1, 103–110.

Müller, Nicole, Jacqueline A. Guendouzi, and Brent Wilson (2008) “Discourse analysis and communication impairment”. In The handbook of clinical linguistics, 3–31. Martin J. Ball, Michael R. Perkins, Nicole Müller, and Sara Howard, eds. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Ottenheimer, Harriet Joseph (2006) The anthropology of language: an introduction to linguistic anthropology. Thomson Wadworth.

Patau, Klaus, David W. Smith, Eeva Therman, Stanley L. Inhorn, and Hans P. Wagner (1960) “Multiple congenital anomaly caused by an extra autosome”. The Lancet 1, 790–793.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(60)90676-0

Perkins, Michael (2007) Pragmatic impairment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486555

Poggi, Isabella (2001) “Towards the alphabet and the lexicon of gesture, gaze and touch”. In Intelligent virtual agents. Third International Workshop, IV A. Madrid, Spain, September 10–11, 2001. Proceedings. Series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. A. de Antonio, R. Aylettn and D. Ballin, eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, Vol. 2190/2001.B. Available online at <www.semioticon.com/virtuals/multimodality/geyboui41.pdf>. Accessed on 05.06. 2013.

Rummo, Ingrid and Silvi Tenjes (2011) “Aja mõistestamine Patau sündroomiga subjekti suhtluses”. [Category of time in the subject with the Patau syndrome.] Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics 7, 231–247.

Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson. and Harvey Sacks (1977) “The preference for self-correction in the organisation of repair in conversation”. Language 52, 2, 361–382.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/413107

Schiffrin, Deborah (2007) Approaches to discourse. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo, and Minna Laakso (2004) “Searching for words: syntactic and sequential construction of word search in conversations of Finnish speakers with aphasia”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37, 1, 1–37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3701_1

Tang, Hao-Wei, Su-Fen Liao, and Jyun-Sian Li (2013) “Development of patients with 47,XX, + 13/45, X mosaics: case report and review of the literature”. European Journal of Pediatrics 5, 1–5.

Tenjes, Silvi, Ingrid Rummo and Kristiina Praakli (2009) “Kommunikatiivse situatsiooni dünaa­miline dimensioon”. [Dynamic dimension of a communicative situation.] Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics 5, 267–285.

Tulving, Endel (1995) “Organization of memory: quo vadis?”. In The cognitive neurosciences, 839–847. M. S. Gazzaniga, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wilkinson, Ray (1995) “Aphasia: conversation analysis of a non-fluent aphasic person”. In Case studies in clinical linguistics, 271–292. M. Perkins and S. Howard, eds. London: Whurr.

Õunap, Katrin (2006) Conclusion of the consultation of a geneticist from 28.12.2006. Manuscript. Tartu.

Žilina, O., T. Reimand, P. Zjablovskaja, K. Männik, M. Männamaa, A. Traat, H. Puusepp-Benazzouz, A. Kurg, and K. Õunap (2012) “Maternally and paternally inherited deletion of 7q31 involving the FOXP2 gene in two families”. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, 158A, 1, 254–256. Available online at <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 22105961>. Accessed on 01.05.2013. 

Internet resources 

Homepage of the University of Helsinki. Available online at <http://www.helsinki.fi/speechsciences/ research/logopedics/communication_disorders.htm>. Accessed on 21.12.2013.

Homepage of National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD). Available online at <http://www.nidcd.nih.gov>. Accessed on 12.06.2012.

Homepage of Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate. Available online at <http://www.aki.ee>. Accessed on 07.01.2013.

Back to Issue