LANDSCAPE AS MONUMENT: SÁMILAND AND ITS CONTESTED PATRIMONY; pp. 487–504Full article in PDF format | 10.3176/tr.2020.4.01
Monuments are typically seen as physical objects created by humans as focal points for unity based on common beliefs, for remembering significant events or individuals and/or as reminders of past glories. For some indigenous groups, including the Sámi, the landscape, or at least some parts of it, has the same or similar associations. For the dominant political forces in the nations that have taken over Sámi lands, however, including those Sámi who have changed and adapted their lives in favour of modern capitalist society, the landscape is less a monument and more an exploitable resource. This dilemma, between the Sámi that retain traditional values and perspectives and a mainstream more concerned with economics and ecology within a modern Eurocentric frame, may be resolvable through compromise, through a mutual recognition of the landscape as a monument on the one hand and modern realities on the other.
Akama, J. (2004) “Neocolonialism, dependency and external control of Africa’s tourism industry: a case study of wildlife safari tourism in Kenya”. In M. Hall and H. Tucker, eds. Tourism and Post-colonialism: contested discourses, identities and representations, 140–153. London: Routledge.
Auster, M. (1997) “Monument in a landscape: the question of ‘meaning’”. Australian Geographer 28, 2, 219–227.
Baglo, C. (2001) “From universal homogeneity to essential heterogeneity: on the visual construction of ‘the Lappish race’”. Acta Borealia 18, 2, 23–39.
Beningfield, J. (2004) “Native lands: language, nation and landscape in the Taal Monument, Paarl, South Africa”. Social Identities 10, 2, 509–525.
Bergman, I., L. Ostland, O. Zackrisson, and L. Liedgren (2008) “Värro Muorra: the landscape significance of Sami sacred wooden objects and sacrificial altars”. Ethnohistory 55, 1, 1–28.
Bjerkli, B. (2010) “Landscape and resistance: the transformation of common land from dwelling landscape to political landscape”. Acta Borealia 27, 2, 221–236.
Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Breglia, L. C. (2009) Monumental ambivalence: the politics of heritage. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Cogos, S., M. Roué, and S. Roturier (2017) “Sami place names and maps: transmitting knowledge of a cultural landscape in contemporary contexts”. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 49, 1, 43–51.
Equality Ombudsman (Diskriminerings Ombudsmannen) (2010) The Sámi indigenous people in Sweden and the right to participate in decision-making. Available online at
Accessed on 15 July 2018.
Ermischer, G. (2004) “Mental landscape: landscape as idea and concept”. Landscape Research 29, 4, 371–383.
Fleming, A. (2006) Post-processual landscape archaeology: a critique. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16, 3, 267–280.
Forest, B. and J. Johnson (2011) “Monumental Politics: Regime Type and Public Memory in Post-Communist States”. Post-Soviet Affairs 27, 3, 269–288.
Foucault, M. (1975) Discipline and punishment. New York: Vintage Books.
General Conference of the International Labour Organisation, C169 Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (1989). Available online at
<https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C169> Accessed on 8 August 2018.
Hall, M. and H. Tucker (2004) “Tourism and Post-colonialism”. In M. Hall and H. Tucker, eds. Tourism and Post-colonialism: contested discourses, identities and representations. London: Routledge.
Josefsen, E. (2010) The Saami and the national parliaments: channels for political influence. Mexico: IPU & UNDP.
Kõiva, M., T. Jonuks, M. Kalda, A. Kuperjanov, and R. Hiiemäe (2020) “Marking of sacred places”. Trames, 24, 2, 129–144.
Lehtinen, A. A. (2005) “Politics of decoupling: breaks between Indigenous and imported senses of the Nordic North”. Journal of Cultural Geography 29, 1, 105–123.
Lowenthal, D. (2005) “Natural and cultural heritage”. International Journal of Heritage Studies 11, 1, 81–92.
Mulk, I.-M. (2009) “Conflicts over the repatriation of Sami cultural heritage in Sweden”. Acta Borealia 26, 2, 194–215.
Mulk, I.-M. and T. Bayliss-Smith (2007) “Liminality, rock art and the Sámi sacred landscape”. Journal of Northern Studies 1, 2, 95–122.
Olwig, K. (2003) “Landscape: the lowenthal legacy”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93, 4, 871–877.
Relph, E. (1976) Place and placelessness. London: Pion.
Scazzosi, L. (2004) “Reading and assessing the landscape as cultural and historical heritage”. Landscape Research 29, 4, 335–355.
Schönfeldt-Aultman, S. M. (2006) “Monument(al) meaning-making: the Ncome monument & its representation of Zulu identity”. Journal of African Cultural Studies 18, 2, 215–234.
Seamon, D. and J. Sowers (2008) “Place and placelessness, Edward Relph”. In P. Hubbard, R. Kitchen, and G. Vallentine, eds. Key texts in human geography, 43–51. London: Sage.
Silven, E. (2014) “Constructing a Sami cultural heritage essentialism and emancipation”. Ethnologia Scandinavica 44:59–74
Sundin, B. (2005) “Nature as heritage: the Swedish case”. International Journal of Heritage Studies 11, 1, 9–20.
Tilley, C. (1994) A phenomenology of landscape places, paths and monuments. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Back to Issue