eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
SINCE 1997
TRAMES cover
TRAMES. A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
ISSN 1736-7514 (Electronic)
ISSN 1406-0922 (Print)
Impact Factor (2020): 0.5


Full article in PDF format | DOI: 10.3176/tr.2015.3.01

Engin Arik


The path and manner of objects in motion events have been studied in many languages. Previous research has focused on whether both path and manner are expressed in the main verb and whether manner can be omitted due to saliency, narrative style, or available linguistic constructions of a particular language. However, it is unknown to what extent language users express manner when it is salient and marked. Aiming to fill this gap, the present study asked how Turkish Sign Language (TİD) signers express location, orientation, and manner in a basic motion event including manner but not path. Eight TİD signers participated in an experiment and described what they saw in 34 brief videos to an addressee. Results showed a significant difference between expressions of location, orientation, and manner or leaving them ambiguous. While TİD signers encoded manners of motion obligatorily, they gave the locations of the objects more than their orientations. Thus, when manner is salient, it must be encoded regardless of language family or modality.


Arik, Engin (2013a) “Expressions of spatial relations in Turkish Sign Language”. In Current directions in Turkish Sign Language research, 219–242. E. Arik ed. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Arik, Engin (2013b) “Classifiers in Turkish Sign Language”. Bilig 67, 1-24.

Arik, Engin (2012a) “Space, time, and iconicity in Turkish Sign Language (TID)”. Trames: A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 16, 4, 345–358.

Arik, Engin (2012b) “Expressions of space during interaction in American Sign Language, Croatian Sign Language, and Turkish Sign Language”. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 48, 2, 179–202.

Arik, Engin (2011) “Left/right and front/back in sign, speech, and co-speech gestures across languages: What do data from Turkish Sign Language, Croatian Sign Language, American Sign Language, Turkish, Croatian, and English reveal?” Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47, 3, 442–469.

Arik, Engin (2010a) “Describing motion events in sign languages”. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46, 4, 367–390.

Arik, Engin (2010b)A crosslinguistic study of the language of space: Sign and spoken languages”. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Arik, Engin (2009) Spatial language: Insights from sign and spoken languages. PhD Dissertation. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, ABD. 

Arik, Engin (2008) “Locative constructions in Turkish Sign Language (TID)”. In Sign Languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present, and future. TISLR9, the Theoretical Issues in Sign Languages Research Conference, 15–31. R. M. de Quadros, ed. Petropolis/RJ, Brazil: Editorar Arara Azul.

Beavers, John, Beth Levin, and Shiao W. Tham (2010) “The typology of motion expressions revisited”. Journal of Linguistics 46, 2, 331–377.

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas Enfield, James Essegbey, and Sotaro Kita (2011) “The macro-event property: the segmentation of causal chains”. In Event representation in language and cogni­tion, 43–67. J. Bohnemeyer and E. Pederson, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas Enfield, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antunano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lüpke, and Felix K. Ameka (2007) “Principles of event segmentation in language: the case of motion events”. Language 83, 495–532.

Brown, Amanda and Jidong Chen (2013) “Construal of Manner in speech and gesture in Mandarin, English, and Japanese”. Cognitive Linguistics 24, 4, 605–631.

Bunger, Ann, Anna Papafragou, and John C. Trueswell (2013) “Event structure influences language production: evidence from structural priming in motion event description”. Journal of Memory and Language 69, 3, 299–323.

Chui, Kawai (2009) “Linguistic and imagistic representations of motion events”. Journal of Pragmatics 41, 9, 1767–1777.

Chui, Kawai (2012) “Cross-linguistic comparison of representations of motion in language and gesture”. Gesture 12, 1, 40–61.

Emmorey, Karen (1996) “The confluence of space and language in signed languages”. In Language and space, 171–209. P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. F. Garrett, eds. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

Emmorey, Karen (2002) Language, cognition, and the brain: insights from sign language research. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

Emmorey, Karen and Melissa Herzig (2003) “Categorical versus gradient properties of classifier constructions in ASL”. In Perspectives on classifier constructions, 221–246. K. Emmorey, ed. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth (1993) Space in Danish Sign Language: the semantics and morpho­syntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum-Verlag.

Gennari, Silvia P., Steven A. Sloman, Barbara C. Malt, and W. Tecumseh Fitch (2002) “Motion events in language and cognition”. Cognition 83, 1, 49–79.

Huang, Xuanfan and Michael Tanangkingsing (2005) “Reference to motion events in six western Austronesian languages: toward a semantic typology”. Oceanic Linguistics 44, 2, 307–340.

Lakusta, Laura and Barbara Landau (2012) “Language and memory for motion events: origins of the asymmetry between source and goal paths”. Cognitive Science 36, 3, 517–544.

Levinson, Stephen C. and David P. Wilkins, eds. (2006) Grammars of space: explorations in cognitive diversity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, Stephen C. (2003) Space in language and cognition: explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, Stephen C., Sotaro Kita, Daniel B. M. Haun, and Björn H. Rasch (2002) “Returning the tables: language affects spatial reasoning”. Cognition 84, 2, 155–188.

Li, Peggy and Lila Gleitman (2002) “Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning”. Cognition 83, 265–294.

Li, Peggy, Linda Abarbanell, Lila Gleitman, and Anna Papafragou (2011) “Spatial reasoning in Tseltal Mayans”. Cognition 120, 1, 33–53.

Newman, John, ed. (2002) The linguistics of standing, sitting, and lying. Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Özyürek, Aslı and Pamela M. Perniss (2011) “Event representations in signed languages”. In Event representations in language and cognition, 84–107. J. Bohnemeyer and E. Pederson, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Özyürek, Aslı, Inge Zwitserlood, and Pamela M. Perniss (2010) “Locative expressions in signed languages: a view from Turkish Sign Language (TID)”. Linguistics 48, 5, 1111–1145.

Papafragou, Anna, Christine Massey, and Lila Gleitman (2002) “Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: the repre­sentation of motion in language and cognition”. Cognition 84, 2, 189–219.

Pederson, Eric, Eve Danziger, David G. Wilkins, Stephen C. Levinson, Sotaro Kita, and Gunter Senft (1998) Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language 74, 3, 557–589.

Perniss, Pamela and Aslı Özyürek (2008) “Constructing action and locating referents: a comparison of German and Turkish Sign Language narratives”. In Signs of the time: selected papers from TISLR 8, 353–378. J. Quer, ed. Hamburg: Signum Press.

Perniss, Pamela M. (2007) Space and iconicity in German Sign Language. (MPI Series in Psycho­linguistics, 45.) Nijmegen, NL.

Perniss, Pamela M., Inge Zwitserlood, and Aslı Özyürek (2011) “Does space structure spatial language? Linguistic encoding of space in sign languages”. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 1595–1600. L. Carlson, C. Holscher, and T. Shipley, eds. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Quinto-Pozos, David (2007) “Can constructed action be considered obligatory?” Lingua 117, 7, 1285–1314.

Schembri, Adam (2003) “Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages”. In Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 3–34. K. Emmorey, ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schembri, Adam, Caroline Jones, and Denis Burnham (2005) “Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners’ gestures without speech”. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10, 3, 272–290.

Slobin, Dan I. (2004) “The many ways to search for a frog: linguistic typology and the expression of motion events”. In Relating events in narrative: typological and contextual perspectives, 219–257. S. Strömqvist and L. Verhoeven, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Slobin, Dan I. (2006) “What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition”. In Space in languages: linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 59–81. M. Hickmann and S. Robert, eds. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Slobin, Dan I. and Nina Hoiting (1994) “Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: typological considerations”. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 20, 487–505. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Sümer, Beyza, Inge Zwitserlood, Pamela M. Perniss, and Aslı Özyürek (2012) “Development of locative expressions by Turkish deaf and hearing children: are there modality effects?” In Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University conference on language development. Vols. 1 and 2, 568-580. Boston Cascadilla Press.

Sümer, Beyza, Inge Zwitserlood, Pamela M. Perniss, and Asli Özyürek (2013) “Acquisition of locative expressions in children learning Turkish Sign Language (TİD) and Turkish”. In Current directions in Turkish Sign Language research, 243–272. E. Arik, ed. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Supalla, Ted (1986) “The classifier system in American Sign Language”. In Noun classification and categorization, 81–214. C. Craig, ed. Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins.

Tai, James H-Y. and Shiou Su (2013) “Encoding motion events in Taiwan Sign Language and Mandarin Chinese: Some typological implications”. In Breaking down the barriers: inter­disciplinary studies in Chinese linguistics and beyond, 79–98. G. Cao, H. Chappell, R. Djamouri, and T. Wiebusch, eds. Taipei, Taiwan: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.

Talmy, Leonard (1983) “How language structures space”. In Spatial orientation: theory, research, and application, 225–282. H. L. Pick, Jr. and L. P. Acredolo, eds. New York: Plenum Press.

Talmy, Leonard (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol 1. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

Talmy, Leonard (2006) “The representation of spatial structure in spoken and signed language”. In Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 207–238. M. Hickmann and S. Robert, eds. Philadelphia PA: John Benjamins.

Taub, Sarah F. (2000) “Iconicity in American sign language: concrete and metaphorical applica­tions”. Spatial Cognition and Computation 2, 31–50.

Taub, Sarah F. (2001) Language from the body: iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wilcox, Sherman (2004) “Cognitive iconicity: conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in sign languages”. Cognitive Linguistics 15, 2, 119–147.

Back to Issue