ESTONIAN STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION AND DEFINITION OF CYBERBULLYING; pp. 323–343Full article in PDF format
| DOI: 10.3176/tr.2012.4.02
Rapid development of information and communication technologies is having a direct impact on the lives of adolescents, and a new form of bullying has emerged. This study aims to examine how Estonian students perceive and define cyberbullying based on five cyberbullying criteria (imbalance of power, intention, repetition, anonymity, and publicity/privacy) and four types of cyberbullying behaviour (written-verbal, visual, exclusion, and impersonation). A quali-quanti approach was used consisting of focus groups and a questionnaire. Two mixed-gender focus groups of 12- and 15-year-old students were interviewed to deepen their perception in relation to cyberbullying criteria and behaviours. Results were used for the quantitative study. The questionnaire was conducted with 336 adolescents from twelve Estonian schools, aged from 11 to 17 years. Results by MDS revealed a two-dimensional model characterized by imbalance of power and anonymity. This study can help to improve understanding of the phenomenon with respect to student perceptions.
Borg, Ingwer and Patrick J. F. Groenen (2005) Modern multidimensional scaling. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Dooley, Julian J., Jacek Pyżalsky, and Donna Cross (2009) “Cyberbullying versus face to face bullying: a theoretical and conceptual review”. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 217, 4, 182–188.
Gradinger, Petra, Dagmar Strohmeier, and Christiane Spiel (2010) “Definition and measurement of cyberbullying”. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 4, 2, 1–13.
Grigg, Dorothy Wunmi (2010) “Cyber-aggression: definition and concept of cyberbullying”. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling 20, 2, 143–156.
Hinduja, Sameer and Justin W. Patchin (2008) “Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization”. Deviant Behavior 29, 2, 129–156.
Hinduja, Sameer and Justin W. Patchin (2009) Bullying beyond the schoolyard: preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (Corwin Press).
Jaworska, Natalia and Angelina Chupetlovska-Anastasova (2009) “A review of multid.imensional scaling (MDS) and its utility in various psychological domains”. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 5, 1, 1–10.
Kowalski, Robin M. and Susan P. Limber (2007) “Electronic bullying among middle school students”. Journal of Adolescent Health 41, S22–S30.
Kowalski, Robin M., Susan P. Limber, and Patricia W. Agatston (2008) Cyber bullying: bullying in the digital age. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Krueger, Richard A. (1994). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kruskal, Joseph B. (1964) “Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to nonmetric hypothesis”. Psychometrics 29, 1–27.
Lenhart A. (2007) “Cyberbullying and online teens: Pew Internet & American life project”. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2007/PIP%20Cyberbullying%20Memo.pdf.pdf. Accessed 23.04.2012.
Li, Qing (2007) “Bullying in the new playground: research into cyberbullying and cyber victimization”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 23, 4, 435–454.
Menesini, Ersilia and Annalaura Nocentini (2009) “Cyberbullying definition and measurement; some critical considerations”. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 217, 4, 230–232.
Menesini, Ersilia, Ada Fonzi, and Peter K. Smith (2002) “Attribution of meanings to terms related to bullying: a comparison between teacher’s and pupil’s perspectives in Italy”. European Journal of Psychology of Education 17, 4, 393–406.
Menesini, Ersilia, Annalaura Nocentini, Benedetta E. Palladino, Ann Frisén, Sofia Berne, Rosario Ortega-Ruiz, Juan Calmaestra, Herbert Scheithauer, Anja Schultze-Krumbholz, Piret Luik, Karin Naruskov, Catherine Blaya, Julien Berthaud and Peter K. Smith (2012) “Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: A comparison across six European countries”. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15, 9, 455–463.
Mishna, Faye, Michael Saini and Steven Solomon (2009) “Ongoing and online: children and youth’s perception of cyberbullying.” Children and Youth Services Review 31, 12, 1222–1228.
Monks, Claire P. and Peter K. Smith (2006) “Definitions of bullying: age differences in understanding of the term, and the role of experience”. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 24, 4, 801–821.
Morgan, David L. (1988) Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Nocentini, Annalaura, Juan J. Calmaestra, Anja Schultze-Krumblholz, Herbert Scheithauer, Rosario Ortega, and Ersilia Menesini (2010) “Cyberbullying: labels, behaviours and definition in three European countries”. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling 20, 2, 129–142.
Olweus, Dan (1999) “Sweden”. In The nature of school bullying: a cross-national perspective, 7–27. Peter K. Smith, Yohji Morit, Josine Junger-Tas, Dan Olweus, Richard Catalano, and Philip Slee, eds. London: Routledge.
Patchin, Justin W. and Sameer Hinduja (2010) “Cyberbullying and self-esteem”. Journal of School Health 80, 12, 614–621.
Shariff, Shaheen (2008) Cyber-bullying: issues and solutions for the school, the classroom and the home. Abington, Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge (Taylor & Frances Group).
Slonje, Robert and Peter K. Smith (2008) “Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying?” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 49, 2, 147–154.
Smith, Peter K., Helen Cowie, Ragnar F. Olafsson, and Andy P.D. Liefooghe (2002) “Definitions of bullying: a comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a fourteen-country international comparison”. Child Development 73, 4, 1119–1133.
Smith, Peter K., Jess Mahdavi, Manuel Carvalho, Sonja Fisher, Shanette Russell, and Neil Tippett (2008) “Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils”. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 49, 4, 376–385.
Smorti, Andrea, Ersilia Menesini and Peter K. Smith (2003) “Parents’ definition of children’s bullying in a five-country comparison”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 34, 4, 417–432.
Tsogo, L., M. J. Masson and Anna Bardot (2000) “Multidimensional scaling methods for many-object sets: a review”. Multivariate Behavioral Research 35, 3, 307–319.
Vaillancourt, Tracy, Patricia McDougall, Shelley Hymel, Amanda Krygsman, Jessie Miller, Kelley Stiver and Clinton Davis (2008) “Bullying: are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing?” International Journal of Behavioural Development 32, 6, 486–495.
Vandebosch, Heidi and Katrien Van Cleemput (2008) “Defining cyberbullying: a qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters”. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11, 4, 4499–4503.
Willard, Nancy E. (2007) Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress. Champaign, Illinois: Research Press.
Williams, Kipling D., Christopher K. T. Cheung, and Wilma Choi (2000) “Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the internet”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
79, 5, 748–762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1688Back to Issue