ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1997
 
TRAMES cover
TRAMES. A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
ISSN 1736-7514 (Electronic)
ISSN 1406-0922 (Print)
Impact Factor (2020): 0.5

IS NEURO-ENHANCEMENT UNNATURAL AND DOES IT MORALLY MATTER?; pp. 188–203

Full article in PDF format | DOI: 10.3176/tr.2011.2.07

Author
Helena Siipi

Abstract
Neuro-enhancement refers to the use of applications of modern neurosciences to make people better – smarter, happier, more sociable etc. This paper consists of analyses on claims concerning unnaturalness of neuro-enhancement. In what sense, if any, is neuro-enhancement unnatural? If neuro-enhancement is unnatural, is its unnaturalness morally noteworthy? Four possible senses of naturalness are analyzed: naturalness as normality, naturalness as suitability, naturalness as belonging, and naturalness as familiarity. None of these interpretations offers sufficient support for the view that neuro-enhancement is morally problematic because of its unnaturalness.
References

Alpert, Sheri (2008) “Neuroethics and nanoethics: do we risk ethical myopia?”. Neuroethics 1, 1, 55–68.
doi:10.1007/s12152-007-9001-5

Angermeier, Paul L. (2000) “The Natural Imperative for Biological Conservation”. Conservation Biology 14, 2, 373–381.
doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98362.x

Aristotle (1984) “Physics”. In The complete works of Aristotle: the revised Oxford translation. J. Barnes, ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Aristotle (1985) Nicomachean Ethics. Transl. by Terence Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Benn, Piers (1998) Ethics. London: UCL Press.

Bergin, Lisa (2009) “Latina feminist metaphysics and genetically engineered foods”. Journal of agricultural and environmental ethics 22, 3, 257–271.
doi:10.1007/s10806-008-9144-3

Buchanan, Allen (2009) “Human nature and enhancement”. Bioethics 23, 3, 141–150.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00633.x

Chan, Saran and John Harris (2007) “In support of human enhancement”. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1, 1, 1–3.

Cooley, D. R. and G. A. Goreham (2004) “Are transgenic organisms unnatural?”. Ethics and the Environment 9, 1, 46–55.
doi:10.2979/ETE.2004.9.1.46

Crowley, Thomas (2010) “From ‘Natural’ to ‘Ecosocial Flourishing’”. Ethics and the Environment 15, 1, 69–100.
doi:10.2979/ETE.2010.15.1.69

Dipert, R. (1995) “Some issues in the theory of artifacts: defining ‘artifact’ and related notions”. The Monist 78, 119–135.

Dupre, John (1998) “Normal people”. Social Research 65, 221–149.

Elliot, Robert (1997) Faking nature: the ethics of environmental restoration. London: Routledge.

Erler, Alexandre (2010) “Does memory modification threaten our authenticity?”. Neuroethics. Online first, Published online 1st September 2010.

Fröding, Barbro Elisabeth Esmeralda (2010) “cognitive enhancement, virtue ethics and the good life”. Neuroethics. Online first, Published online 22nd September 2010.

Glannon, Walter (2006) “Neuroethics”. Bioethics 20, 1, 37–52.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00474.x

Goodman , Rob (2010) “Cognitive enhancement, cheating, and accomplishment”. Kennedy Institute Ethics Journal 20, 2, 145–160.
doi:10.1353/ken.0.0309

Gräsbeck, Ralph (1995) “Normaalin käsite lääketieteessä”. In Lääketiede ja Filosofia, 66–77. Pekka Louhiala, ed. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.

Habermas, Jürgen (2003) The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hacking, Ian (1990) “The normal state”. In The taming of chance, 160–169. Ian Hacking, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haraway, D. J. (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. Femaleman©_Meets_OncoMouse™. Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.

Harris, John (1985) The value of life: an introduction to medical ethics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Hauskeller, Michael (2005) “Telos: revival of an aristotelian concept in present day ethics”. Inquiry 48, 62–75.
doi:10.1080/00201740510015356

Hilpinen, Risto (1992) “On artifacts and works of art”. Theoria 58, 1, 58–82.
doi:10.1111/j.1755-2567.1992.tb01155.x

Häyry, Matti (1994) “Categorical objections to genetic engineering – a critique”. In Ethics and Biotechnology, 202–215. A. Dyson and John Harris, eds. London: Routledge.

Häyry, Matti and Heta Häyry (1989) “Ihmisoikeudet, moraali ja lisääntymisen vapaus”. In Luonnotonta lastensaantia. Heta Häyry and Matti Häyry, eds. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

Katz, Eric (1997) “Artifacts and functions: a note on the value of nature”. In Nature as subject: human obligation and natural community, 121–132. Eric Katz, ed. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

Kraemer, Felicitas (2010) “Authenticity anyone? The enhancement of emotions via neuro-psychopharmacology”. Neuroethics.Online first, Published online15th May 2010.

Krieger, Martin H. (1973) “What’s wrong with plastic trees?”. Science179, 446–455.
doi:10.1126/science.179.4072.446

Lane, Christopher (2009) “Using meds for ‘neuro-enhancement’”. Psychology Today. April 25th, 2009. Retrieved December 20th 2010 from www-pages http://www.psychologytoday.com/ blog/side-effects/200904/using-meds-neuro-enhancement.

Lee, Keekok (1999) The natural and the artefactual: the implications of deep science and deep technology for environmental philosophy. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Lee, Keekok (2004) “There is biodiversity and biodiversity: implications for environmental philosophy”. In Markku Oksanen and Juhani Pietarinen, eds. Philosophy and Biodiversity, 152–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lev, Ori (2010) “The ethics of research on enhancement interventions”. Kennedy Institute Ethics Journal 20, 2, 101–113.
doi:10.1353/ken.0.0314

Levy, Donald (1980) “Perversion and the unnaturalness as moral categories”. Ethics 90, 191–202.
doi:10.1086/292146

Lo, Yeuk-Sze (1999) “Natural and artifactual: restored nature as subject”. Environmental Ethics 21, 247–266.

Loux, Michael J. (1999) “Essentialism”. In The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy, 281–283. Robert Audi, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Madsen, Katherine Hauge, Preben Bach Holm, Jesper Lassen, and Peter Sandøe (2002) “Ranking genetically modified plants according to familiarity”. Journal of Agricultural and Environ­mental Ethics 15, 3, 267–278.
doi:10.1023/A:1015729011895

McKibben, Bill (1989) The end of nature. New York: Random House.

Midgley, Mary (2000) “biotechnology and monstrosity: why we should pay attention to the ‘Yak Factor’”. Hastings Center Report 30, 7–15.
doi:10.2307/3527881

Mill, John Stuart (1969) Essays on ethics, religion and society. J. M. Robson, ed. (Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 10.) Toronto: Toronto University Press.

Parens, Erik (2005) “Authenticity and ambivalence: towards understanding the enhancement debate”. Hastings Center Report May-June, 34–41.
doi:10.1353/hcr.2005.0067

Priest, Graham (1997) “Sexual perversion”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75, 3, 360–371.
doi:10.1080/00048409712347951

Radcliffe Richards, Janet (1984) The sceptical feminist: a philosophical enquiry. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Räikkä, Juha (1996) “The social concept of disease”. Theoretical Medicine 17, 353–361.
doi:10.1007/BF00489680

Räikkä, Juha and Veikko Launis (1992) “Kuka on Sairas?”. Sosiaalilääketieteellinen aikakauslehti 29, 156–164.

Räikkä, Juha and Kaija Rossi (2002) Geenit ja etiikka: kysymyksiä uuden geeniteknologian arvoista. Helsinki: WSOY.

Sagoff, Mark (1985) “Fact and value in ecological science”. Environmental Ethics 17, 99–116.

Siipi, Helena (2005) Naturalness, unnaturalness, and artifactuality in bioethical argumentation. Turku: University of Turku.

Siipi, Helena (2008) “Dimensions of naturalness”. Ethics and the Environment 13, 1, 71–103.
doi:10.2979/ETE.2008.13.1.71

Siipi, Helena (2011) “Non-backward-looking naturalness as an environmental value”. Forthcoming in Ethics, Policy & Environment 2011.

Soper, Kate (1995) What is nature? Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Sparrow, Robert (2010) “Better than men? Sex and the therapy/enhancement distinction”. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20, 2, 115–144.
doi:10.1353/ken.0.0308

Streiffer, R. (2003) “In defence of the moral relevance of species boundaries”. American Journal of Bioethics 3, 37–38.
doi:10.1162/15265160360706543

The President’s Council on Bioethics (2003) “Beyond therapy: biotechnologies and the pursuit of happiness”. Retrieved December 15th 2010 from www-pages http://bioethics.georgetown. edu/pcbe/reports/beyondtherapy/.

Tiles, Mary (1993) “The normal and pathological: the concept of scientific medicine”. British Journal of Philosophy of Science 44, 729–742.
doi:10.1093/bjps/44.4.729

Verhoog, Henk, Mirjam Matze, Edith Lammerts Van Bueren, and Ton Baars (2003) “The role of concept of the natural (naturalness) in organic farming”. Journal of agricultural and environmental ethics 16, 1, 29–49.
doi:10.1023/A:1021714632012

Wachbroit, Robert (1994) “Normality as a biological concept”. Philosophy of Science 61, 579–591.
doi:10.1086/289823

Wachbroit, Robert (2003) “Normal humans, human nature, and genetic lessons”. In Genetic prospects: essays on biotechnology, ethics, and public policy, 51–60. W. A. Galston, ed. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Wedin, Michael, V. (1999) “Aristotle”. In The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy, 44–51. Robert Audi, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wouters, Arno G. (2003) “Four notions of biological function”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological Biomedical Sciences 34, 633–668.
doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2003.09.006
Back to Issue