THE SOCIAL ORIGINS OF THE ESTONIAN NON-PROFIT SECTOR; pp. 441–449Full article in PDF format
| DOI: 10.3176/tr.2008.4.05
Based on the findings of the previous third sector research in Estonia about the weak embedding of this sector in the society, the central question for the study concerns the causes for this. I attempt to trace these causes back to the political, historical, cultural and economic environment (embeddedness) of the third sector. The environment is not observed as static. The influence of time, path dependent developments, and the mechanisms of interplay of these paths – pointing to a certain dynamic – are essential in explaining the present weakness of the third sector. As the study has shown, its relations to the state sector and business sector are rather weak. This is mainly caused by the (neo)liberal politics Estonian governments have followed during the time since regaining independence; the experience of Estonian people of the Soviet past, but also by certain cultural characteristics.
Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba (1963) The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Anheier Helmut K., Eckhardt Priller, and Annette Zimmer (2000) Civil society in transition: the east German third sector ten years after the unification. (Civil Society Working Paper, 15.) London: Center for Civil Society, London School of Economics.
Anheier Helmut K., Wolfgang Seibel (2000) The nonprofit sector in Germany. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Appleton, Louise (2003) “The contribution of NPOs to family policy formulation in EU member and applicant states”. Voluntas 14, 1, 79–103.
Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Stephen E. Hanson (2003) “Time, space and institutional change in central and eastern Europe”. In Capitalism and democracy in central and eastern Europe, 15–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huntington, Samuel (1996) The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Ingelhart, Ronald (1995) Kultureller Umbruch: Wertewandel in der Westlichen Welt. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus Verlag.
Lagerspetz, Mikko and Aire Trummal (2003) “Eesti kodanikuühendused täna”. [.
Translation] In Tuntud ja tundmatu kodanikeühiskond [ Translation], 32–45. Mikko Lagerspetz, Aire Trumma, Rein Ruutsoo, Erle Rikmann, and Daimar Liiv, eds. Tallinn: Kirjastus “Kunst”.
Lehmbruch, Gerhard (1994) “Institutionen, Interessen und sektorale Variationen in der Transformationsdynamik der politischen Ökonomie Ostdeutschlands”. Journal für Sozialforschung 34, 1, 21–44.
Mahoney, James (2000) “Path dependency in historical sociology”. Theory and Society 29, 507–548.
Pierson, Paul (2000) “Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics”. The American Political Science Review 94, 2, 251–267.
Pridham, Geoffrey (2000) The dynamics of democratization: a comparative approach. London and New York: Continuum.
Putnam, Robert D. (1993) Making democracy work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Marylin Rueschemeyer, and Bjorn Wittrock (1998) “Introduction”. In Participation and democracy east and west: comparisons and interpretations, 3–8. Dietrich Rueschemeyer, Marylin Rueschemeyer, and Bjorn Wittrock, eds. Armonk, New York, London, England: M. E. Sharpe.
Saar, Andrus (2001) Muutused väärtushinnangutes aastail 1990–1999. Uuringu aruanne. [
Translation.] Tallinn: Saar Poll.
Salamon, Lester M. and Helmut K. Anheier (1998) “Social origins of civil society: explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally”. Voluntas 9, 3, 213–248.
Salamon, Lester M., S., Wojciech Sokolowski, and Helmut K. Anheier (2000) Social origins of civil society: an overview. (Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, 38.) Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
Seibel, Wolfgang (1990) “Government/third-sector relationship in a comparative perspective: the cases of France and West Germany”. Voluntas 1, 1, 42–60.
Skapska, Grazyna (1997) “Normative self-understanding of post-communist societies: solidarity without liberal rights or liberalism without communitarian grounds or reform chaos to uncertainty”. In ZERP: the normative foundation of the polity, 13–30. Ulrich K. Preuß and Armin Höland, eds. (Diskussionspapier, 6/97.) Bremen: Zentrum für Europäische Rechtspolitik.
Stake, Robert E. (1998) “Case study”. In Strategies of qualitative inquiry, 86–109. Norman K Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. Thousand Oaks, London, and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Yin, Robert K. (2003) Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, London, and New Delhi: Sage Publications.Back to Issue