eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
SINCE 1952
Proceeding cover
of the estonian academy of sciences
ISSN 1736-7530 (Electronic)
ISSN 1736-6046 (Print)
Impact Factor (2020): 1.045

Experimental analysis of end mill axis inclination and its influence on 3D areal surface texture parameters; pp 194–201

Full article in PDF format |

Andris Logins, Pedro Rosado Castellano, Toms Torims, Santiago C. Gutiérrez, Fjodor Sergejev



The surface quality of machined parts depends highly on the surface texture that reflects the marks of the tool during the cutting process. The traditional theoretical approach indicates that these marks are related to the cutting parameters (e.g. cutting speed, feed, depths of cut), the machining type, the part material, the tool, etc. The influence of these factors has been widely studied by researchers and they have been considered in milling process models proposed to predict the final surface texture.
Nevertheless, if an accurate prediction is desired, these milling models must include different geometrical errors influencing the cutting edges path on the part. In this paper, we present the results of a study showing the influence of real mill-axis inclination on 3D surface texture. Therefore, experiments with simple, end mill tool operation, with constant cutting parameters and four different cutting directions (the directions that we labelled as North, South, East, and West) in accordance with the machine coordinate system were performed. Using optical 3D areal surface texture measurement techniques with the Bruker Contour device, we obtained areal surface texture parameters for analysis. Descriptive statistical analysis and one-way ANOVA analysis were performed to detect the factor significances and their influence on 3D areal surface texture parameters. The results from ANOVA and graphical analysis clearly identified tool-axis inclination in the South and West directions. If a relationship between tool-axis inclination and surface texture parameters can be demonstrated, this calculation can be included in the model of 3D surface texture formation. Improving the mathematical model with all possible errors occurring in high speed machining operations helps to obtain more precise texture parameter Sz results for simple end mill operation. The model is suitable for complicated machining operations with ball end mill tools.




1. Sai, W. B., Salah, N. B., and Lebrun, J. L. Influence of machining by finishing milling on surface characteristics. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu., 2001, 41, 443–450.

2. Baek, D. K., Ko, T. J., and Kim, H. S. A dynamic surface roughness model for face milling. Int. J. ASPE, 1997, 20, 171–178.

3. Kline, W. A. and Devor, R. E. The effect of runout on cutting geometry and forces in milling. Int. J. Mach. Tool. D. R., 1983, 23, 123–140.

4. Arizmendi, M., Fernández, J., López de Lacalle, L. N., Lamikiz, A., Gil, A., Sánchez, J. A., Campa, F. J., and Veiga, F. Model development for the prediction of surface topography generated by ball-end mills taking into account the tool parallel axis offset. Experimental validation. CIRP ANN. Manuf. Techn., 2008, 57, 101–104.

5. Buj-Corral, I., Vivancos-Calvet, J., and González-Rojas, H. Influence of feed, eccentricity and helix angle on topography obtained in side milling processes. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu., 2011, 51, 889–897.

6. Franco, P., Estrems, M., and Faura, F. Influence of radial and axial runouts on surface roughness in face milling with round insert cutting tools. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu., 2004, 44, 1555–1565.

7. Childs, T. H. C. Numerical experiments on the influence of material and other variables on plane strain continuous chip formation in metal machining. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2006, 48, 301–322.

8. Sutherland, J. W. and Babin, T. S. The geometry of surface generated by the bottom of an end mill. In Proceedings 16th NAMRC: North American Manufacturing Research Conference, May 24–27, 1988, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 202–208

9. Dang, J. W., Zhang, W., and Wan, Y. M. Cutting force modelling for flat end milling including bottom edge cutting effect. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu., 2010, 50, 986–997.

10. Arizmendi, M., Campa, F. J., Fernandez, J., Lopez de Lacalle, L. N., Gil, A., Bilbao, E., Veiga, F., and Lamikiz, A. Model for surface topography prediction in peripheral milling considering tool vibration. CIRP ANN. Manuf. Techn., 2009, 58, 93–96.

11. Baek, D. K., Ko, T. J., and Kim, H. S. Optimization of feed rate in a face milling operation using a surface roughness model. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manu., 2001, 41, 451–462.

12. Torims, T., Logins, A., Castellano Rosado, P., Gutiérrez, S., and Torres, R. The dependence of 3D surface roughness parameters on high-speed milling technological parameters and machining strategy. In Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2014, IMECE2014, 90.


Back to Issue