ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
PUBLISHED
SINCE 1952
 
Proceeding cover
proceedings
of the estonian academy of sciences
ISSN 1736-7530 (Electronic)
ISSN 1736-6046 (Print)
Impact Factor (2020): 1.045

Design for sustainability approach in product development – a case study using innovative nail polishes developed by a small enterprise; pp. 297–303

Full article in PDF format | doi: 10.3176/proc.2016.3.11

Authors
Jana Simanovska, Zane Grigale-Soročina

Abstract

This article presents a study on Design for Sustainability (D4S) that we conducted in a small company assessing three innovative formulas of nail polish: conventional nail polish, hybrid polish, and gel polish. In light of the need to reduce environmental pollution, the negative social consequences of the production, and the use of various products, manufacturers are challenged to develop products that are economically feasible, attractive to consumers, cause no harm to workers and consumers, and are safe for the environment. In Europe, small and medium-sized companies (SMEs) produce more than half (by economic value) of all goods. However, are they able to implement D4S and do they have the appropriate tools for it? During our case study, we addressed the question about the existence of a suitable tool for SMEs to apply D4S. As the tool, we used a multicriterion matrix visualized as a star diagram and adjusted to the needs of a specific company. The newest development in nail coatings – hybrid polish – seems to be the best formula as it provides optimal technical performance and reduces health and environmental impacts. We demonstrated that decision-making is assisted by the use of a simple multi-criterion matrix in the form of a star diagram that integrates environmental and social aspects during the product design phase in a systematic and transparent way.


References

Ahrens, A., Bohm, E., and Heimann, K. 2003 Guidance for the Use of Environmentally Sound Substances. Part I, Five Steps for the Evaluation of Environmental Risks. Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt), Berlin.

Cho, K. T. 2003. Multicriteria decision methods: an attempt to evaluate and unify. Math. Comput. Model., 37, 1099–1119.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(03)00122-5

C&L Inventory, provided by European Chemicals Agency. http://echa.europa.eu/regulations/clp/cl-inventory (accessed 2016-01-11).

EDS priority list. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/endocrine/strategy/substances_en.htm#priority_list (accessed 2016-01-11).

Eisenberg, D. A, Yu, M., Lam, C. W., Ogunseitan, O. A., and Schoenung, J. M. 2013. Comparative alternative materials assessment to screen toxicity hazards in the life cycle of CIGS thin film photovoltaics. J. Hazard. Mater., 260, 534–542.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.007

Grigale-Sorocina, Z., Kalnins, M., Simanovska, J., Vindedze, E., Birks, I., and Brazdauska, E. 2015. Additives in UV-activated urethane acrylate polymerization composite coatings. Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci., 64(1S), 88–93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3176/proc.2015.1S.04

Jančovičová, V., Mikula, M., Havlinova, B., and Jakubikova, Z. 2013. Influence of UV-curing conditions on polymeri­zation kinetics and gloss of urethane acrylate coatings. Progr. Org. Coat., 76(2–3), 432–438.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.10.010

Knight, P. and Jenkins, J. O. 2009. Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioners perspective. J. Clean. Prod., 17(5), 549–558.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.10.002

Muller, P., Caliandro, C., Peycheva, V., Gagliardi, D., Marzocchi, C., Ramlogan, R., and Cox, D. 2015. Annual Report on European SMEs 2014/2015, SMEs Start Hiring Again (Hope, K., ed.). http://ec.europa.eu/ growth/smes/business-friendly-environment/performance-review/index_en.htm#annual-report (accessed 2016-01-11).

Negoescu, F., Axinte, E., Nagîţ, G., and Iosub, A. 2009. Innovative solutions creates environmental advantages. Environ. Eng. Manage. J., 8(5), 1191–1197.

Nissen, N. F. 2001. Entwicklung eines ökologischen Bewertungs­modells zur Beurteilung elektronischer Systeme. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Berlin, Department of Electrical Engineering.

Poulikidou, S., Bjorklund, A., and Tyskeng, S. 2014. Empirical study on integration of environmental aspects into product development: processes, requirements and the use of tools in vehicle manufacturing companies in Sweden. J. Clean. Prod., 81, 34–45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.001

Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. 2009. Official Journal of the European Communities, L342/59, 22.12.2009, Brussels.

Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classi­fi­cation, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures. 2008. Official Journal of the European Communities, L353/1, 31.12.2008, Brussels.

Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). 2006. Official Journal of the European Communities, L396/1, 30.12.2006, Brussels.

Simanovska, J., Valters, K., Bažbauers, G., and Luttropp, C. 2012. An ecodesign method for reducing the adverse effects of hazardous substances in the product lifecycle. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 49(3), 57–69.

Wang, F., Hu, J. Q., and Tu, W. P. 2008. Study on micro­structure of UV-curable polyurethane acrylate films. Progr. Org. Coat., 62, 245–250.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2007.12.005


Back to Issue