ESTONIAN ACADEMY
PUBLISHERS
eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
cover
Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Chemistry
Treatment of sulphate containing yeast wastewater in an anaerobic sequence batch reactor; pp. 38–52
PDF | https://doi.org/10.3176/chem.2007.1.03

Authors
Marina Krapivina, Tõnu Kurissoo, Sergei Zub, Raivo Vilu
Abstract

Anaerobic mesophilic fermentation of sulphate containing yeast industry wastewaters at laboratory scale with anaerobic sequence batch reactors (ASBR) was studied. Three different treat­ment schemes were investigated – ASBR with and without a polymeric filler and coupled micro­aerophilic/anaerobic SBR (CSBR). The optimal concentration of sludge (total solids 17.3 g L–1) in the reactor and the optimal reaction time (22 h) were determined. It was shown that in the case of ASBR efficient treatment characterized by chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal of 75–82% took place at volume loading rates up to 7.7–8.0 kgCOD m–3 d–1 and at COD/(SO4)2– ratio 8.0. In optimal conditions the methane content of the biogas was 60%. The best results for sulphate removal (99%) were achieved in the CSBR with the concentration of sulphide in the reactor effluent being about 10 mg L–1. Decreasing treatment efficiency after a long-time exploitation of these reactors occurred as a result of the formation of insoluble sediment (presumably CaCO3 and Ca3(PO4)2).

References

1. Lens, P. N. L, Omil, F., Lema, J. M. & Hulshoff-Pol, L. W. Biological treatment of organic sulphate-rich wastewaters. In Environmental Technologies to Treat Sulphur Pollution (Lens, P. & Hulshoff-Pol, L., eds). IWA Publishing, London, Alliance, 2000, 467–489.

2. O‘Flaherty, V. & Colleran, E. Effect of sulphate addition on volatile fatty acid and ethanol degradation in an anaerobic hybrid reactor, I: process disturbance and remediation. Biores. Tehnol., 1999, 68, 101–110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00145-X

3. Sung, S. & Dague, R. R. Laboratory studies on the anaerobic sequencing batch reactor process. Water Environ. Res., 1995, 67, 291–294.
https://doi.org/10.2175/106143095X131501

4. Clesceri, L. C., Breenberg, A. E. & Trussel, R. R. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC, USA, 1989.

5. Blonskaja, V., Menert, A., Kurissoo, T. & Vilu, R. Use of biological oxidation in the operation of anaerobic digester with sulphate-rich wastewaters. In Proc. 9th World Congress Anaerobic Digestion. Antwerpen, Belgium, 2001, Part 1, 713–718.

6. Maree, J. P., Hulse, G., Dods, D. & Schutte, C. E. Pilot plant studies on biological sulphate removal from industrial effluent. Water Sci. Technol., 1991, 23, 1293–1300.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1991.0581

7. Doorn, M., Strait, R. & Barnard, W. In Estimates of Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Industrial and Domestic Wastewater Treatment. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, 1997, 148.

8. Rinzema, A. & Lettinga, G. Anaerobic treatment of sulphate containing wastewater. In Bio­treatment Systems (Wise, D. L., ed.). CRC Press, Boca Ration, 1988, 65–109.

9. Lens, P. N. L., Visser, A., Janssen, A. J. H., Hulshoff-Pol, L. W. & Lettinga, G. Biotechno­logical treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1998, 28(1), 41–88.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389891254160

10. Welsh, D. T. Ecological significance of compatible solute accumulation by microorganisms: from single cells to global climate. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 2000, 24, 263–290.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00542.x

11. Isa, Z., Grusenmeyer, S. & Vertraete, W. Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high rate anaerobic digestion: technical aspects. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 1986, 51, 580–587.
https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.51.3.580-587.1986

12. Matuzevičius, A. & Dilba, A. Experience in using anaerobic reactors for treating highly polluted wastewater. Environ. Engin., 1999, 4, 206–208.

13. Thalasso, F., Van Der Burght, J., O’Flaherty, V. & Colleran, E. Large-scale anaerobic degrada­tion of betaine. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 1999, 74(12), 1176–1182.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199912)74:12<1176::AID-JCTB156>3.0.CO;2-Q

14. Buisman, C. J. N., Bert, G. G., Lispeert, P. & Lettinga, G. Optimisation of sulphur production in a biotechnological sulphide-removing reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 1990, 35, 50–56.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260350108

15. Buisman, C. N. J., Stams, A. J., Meijer, H. & Lettinga, G. Sulphur and sulphate reduction with acetate and propionate in an anaerobic process for sulphide removal. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 1989, 32, 363–370.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184990

16. Lettinga, G. Anaerobic wastewater treatment systems. Ant. Leeuw., 1995, 67, 3–28.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872193

17. Hulshoff Pol, L., Lens, P., Stams, A. J. M. & Lettinga, G. Anaerobic treatment of sulphate-rich wastewaters. Biodegradation, 1998, 9(3–4), 213–224.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008307929134

 

Back to Issue

Back issues