eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
SINCE 1984
Oil Shale cover
Oil Shale
ISSN 1736-7492 (Electronic)
ISSN 0208-189X (Print)
Impact Factor (2021): 1.442
Thermal methods of solid fuel processing: review; pp. 217–240
PDF | 10.3176/oil.2022.3.04

Zhannur Kadenovna Myltykbayeva, Zhaniya Тurlykhanovna Yeshova, Мadi Bekezhanuly Smaiyl

A review of literature data on the processing of solid types of combustible fossils into liquid fuels and chemical products has been carried out. The reserves of solid fossil fuels far exceed the natural resources of oil and gas, so the development of methods for processing solid fossil fuels into chemical products and liquid fuels is an urgent task. The main methods of processing coal and oil shale (OS) are reduced to pyrolysis and supercritical gasification. Pyrolysis is preferred for processing oil shale into shale oil, and currently a promising method for processing coal is extraction with supercritical solvents such as water and CO2 at temperatures up to 900 °C and in some cases with the addition of a catalyst. For oil shale, the gasification process, like pyrolysis, is carried out under milder conditions, since the mineral part of oil shale contains trace elements that act as catalysts, and the structure of the organic part of oil shale is more similar in composition to oil.


1. Statistical Review of World Energy, 2020, 69th edition. Bp, 1–66.

2. World Energy Council. World Energy Resources, 2016.

3. Shinn, J. H. From coal to single-stage and two-stage products: A reactive model of coal structure. Fuel, 1984, 63(9), 1187–1196.

4. Lille, Ü., Heinmaa, I., Pehk, T. Molecular model of Estonian kukersite kerogen evaluated by 13C MAS NMR spectra. Fuel, 2003, 82(7), 799–804.

5Estonian Oil Shale Industry Yearbook 2019 (Oone, A., Ed.), 2020, 1–66.

6. Li, S. The developments of Chinese oil shale activities. Oil Shale, 2012, 29(2), 101–102.

7. Chen, A. Petro China´s Gulong Shale Project May Bolster China´s Oil Output

8. Thomson, E. The Chinese Coal Industry: An Economic History. Routledge, London, 2002.

9. Dyni, J. R. 2004 Survey of Energy Resources. Oil Shale, 2004, 73–91.

10. Perry, H. Coal conversion technology. Chem. Eng., 1974, 81(15), 88–102.

11. White, L. C., Frederick, J. P. ENCOAL mild coal gasification project. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 11–15 Sep 1995, 151–156.

12. U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. The ENCOAL® Mild Coal Gasification Project. A DOE Assessment. DOE/NETL-2002/1171.

13. Wu, J., Liu, Q., Wang, R., He, W., Shi, L., Guo, X., Chen, Z., Ji, L., Liu, Z. Coke formation during thermal reaction of tar from pyrolysis of a subbituminous coal. Fuel Process. Technol., 2017, 155, 68–73.

14. Solomon, P. R., Serio, M. A., Suuberg, E. M. Coal pyrolysis: Experiments, kinetic rates and mechanisms. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 1992, 18(2), 133–220.

15. Geng, C., Li, S., Yue, C., Ma, Y. Pyrolysis characteristics of bituminous coal. J. Energy Inst., 2016, 89(4), 725–730.

16. Lei, Z., Yang, D., Zhang, Y.-H., Cui, P. Constructions of coal and char molecular models based on the molecular simulation technology. J. Fuel Chem. Technol., 2017, 45(7), 769–779.

17. Solomon, P. R., Fletcher, T. H., Pugmire, R. J. Progress in coal pyrolysis. Fuel, 1993, 72(5), 587–597.

18. Liu, X., Cui, P., Ling, Q., Zhao, Z., Xie, R. A review on co-pyrolysis of coal and oil shale to produce coke. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4), 504–512.

19. Speight, J. G. Mining and retorting. Shale Oil and Gas Production Processes. Gulf Professional Publishing, 2019, 797–847.

20. Speight, J. In situ retorting. Shale Oil and Gas Production Processes. Gulf Professional Publishing, 2019, 849–871.

21. Qian, J., Wang, J. World oil shale retorting technologies. In: Int. Conf. on Oil Shale: Recent Trends in Oil Shale, 7–9 November 2006, Amman, Jordan, 7–9.

22. Qian, J. L., Yin, L., Wang, J., Li, S., Han, F., He, Y. Oil shale – Supplementary Energy of Petroleum. Beijing: China Petrochemical Press, 2011.

23. Zheng, D., Li, S., Ma, G., Wang, H. Autoclave pyrolysis experiments of Chinese Liushuhe oil shale to simulate in-situ underground thermal conversion. Oil Shale, 2012, 29(2), 103–114.

24. Korb, J.-P., Nicot, B., Louis-Joseph, A., Bubici, S., Ferrante, G. Dynamics and wettability of oil and water in oil shales. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118(40), 23212–23218.

25. Guo, S., Ruan, Z. The composition of Fushun and Maoming shale oils. Fuel, 1995, 74(11), 1719–1721.

26. Shi, Y., Li, S., Ma, Y., Yue, C., Shang, W., Hu, H., He, J. Pyrolysis of Yaojie oil shale in a Sanjiang-type pilot-scale retort. Oil Shale, 2012, 29(4), 368–375.

27. Cao, X., Birdwell, J. E., Chappell, M. A., Li, Y., Pignatello, J. J., Mao, J. Charac—terization of oil shale, isolated kerogen, and postpyrolysis residues using advanced 13C solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. AAPG Bull., 2013, 97(3), 421–436.

28. Alstadt, K. N., Katti, D. R., Katti, K. S. An in situ FTIR step-scan photoacoustic investigation of kerogen and minerals in oil shale. Spectrochim. Acta A, 2012, 89, 105–113.

29. Ma, Y., Li, S. The mechanism and kinetics of oil shale pyrolysis in the presence of water. Carbon Resour. Convers., 2018, 1(2), 160–164.

30. Qian, J., Wang, J., Li, S. World oil shale. Energy of China, 2006, 28(8), 16–19 (in Chinese).

31. Külaots, I., Goldfarb, J. L., Suuberg, E. M. Characterization of Chinese, American and Estonian oil shale semicokes and their sorptive potential. Fuel, 2010, 89(11), 3300–3306.

32. Han, X., Kulaots, I., Jiang, X., Suuberg, E. M. Review of oil shale semicoke and its combustion utilization. Fuel, 2014, 126, 143–161.

33. Allred, V. D. Shale oil developments: Kinetics of oil shale pyrolysis. Chem. Eng. Prog., 1966, 62(8), 50–60.

34. Campbell, J. H., Gallegos, G., Gregg, M. Gas evolution during oil shale pyrolysis. 2. Kinetic and stoichiometric analysis. Fuel, 1980, 59(10), 727–732.

35. Campbell, J. H., Koskinas, G. J., Gallegos, G., Gregg, M. Gas evolution during oil shale pyrolysis. 1. Nonisothermal rate measurements. Fuel, 1980, 59(10), 718–726.

36. Yen, T. F., Chilingarian, G. V. Oil Shale. Developments in Petroleum Science, 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1976.

37. Kang, Z., Zhao, Y., Yang, D. Review of oil shale in-situ conversion technology. Appl. Energy, 2020, 269, 115121.

38. Kang, Z., Zhao, Y., Yang, D., Tian, L., Li, X. A pilot investigation of pyrolysis from oil and gas extraction from oil shale by in-situ superheated steam injection. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 2020, 186, 106785.

39. Gyulmaliev, A. M., Golovin, G. S., Gladun, T. G. Theoretical Foundations of Coal Chemistry. – Moscow: Publishing House of the Moscow State Mining University, 2003 (in Russian).

40. Ulanovskii, M. L. Chemical aspects of coal metamorphism and the formation of low-molecular volatiles. Coke and Chemistry, 2012, 55(12), 439–443.

41. Epshtein, S. A., Suprunenko, O. I., Barabanova, O. V. The material composition and reactivity of vitrinites of hard coals of various degrees of reduction. Solid Fuel Chemistry, 2005, 39(1), 19–31.

42. Makitra, R. G., Pristansky, Z. E. Dependence of the degree of swelling of coals on the physicochemical properties of solvents. Solid Fuel Chemistry, 2001, No. 5, 3–12 (in Russian).

43. Cao, Y., Han, H., Liu, H., Jia, J., Zhang, W., Liu, P., Ding, Z., Chen, S., Lu, J., Gao, Y. Influence of solvents on pore structure and methane adsorption capacity of lacustrine shales: An example from a Chang 7 shale sample in the Ordos Basin, China. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 2019, 178, 419–428.

44. Butala, S. J. M., Medina, J. C., Hulse, R. J., Bartholomew, C. H., Lee, M. L. Pressurized fluid extraction of coal. Fuel, 2000, 79(13), 1657–1664.

45. Cao, Y., Han, H., Guo, C., Pang, P., Ding,  Z., Gao, Y. Influence of extractable organic matters on pore structure and its evolution of Chang 7 member shales in the Ordos Basin, China: Implications from extractions using various solvents. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 2020, 79, 103370.

46. Liu, Y., Yan, L., Lv, P., Ren, L., Kong, J., Wang, J., Li, F., Bai, Y. Effect of n-hexane extraction on the formation of light aromatics from coal pyrolysis and catalytic upgrading. J. Energy Inst., 2020, 93(3), 1242–1249.

47. Doskočil, L., Enev, V., Pekař, M., Wasserbauer, J. The spectrometric charac-teri-zation of lipids extracted from lignite samples from various coal basins. Org. Geochem., 2016, 95, 34–40.

48. Niu, Z., Liu, G., Yin, H., Zhou, C., Wu, D., Yousaf, B., Wang, C. Effect of pyridine extraction on the pyrolysis of a perhydrous coal based on in-situ FTIR analysis. J. Energy Inst., 2019, 92(3), 428–437.

49. Luo, A., Zhang, D., Zhu, P., Qu, X., Zhang, J.-L., Zhang, J.-S. Effect of pyridine extraction on the tar characteristics during pyrolysis of bituminous coal. J. Fuel Chem. Technol., 2017, 45(11), 1281–1288.

50. He, Y., Zhao, R., Yan, L., Bai, Y., Li, F. The effect of low molecular weight compounds in coal on the formation of light aromatics during coal pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 2017, 123, 49–55.

51. Zhang, S., Zhang, X., Hao, Z., Wang, Z., Lin, J., Liu, M. Dissolution behavior and chemical characteristics of low molecular weight compounds from tectonically deformed coal under tetrahydrofuran extraction. Fuel, 2019, 257, 116030.

52. Sönmez, Ö., Yıldız, Ö., Çakır, M. Ö., Gözmen, B., Giray, E. S. Influence of the addition of various ionic liquids on coal extraction with NMP. Fuel, 2018, 212, 12–18.

53. Wei, L., Mastalerz, M., Schimmelmann, A., Chen, Y. Influence of Soxhlet-extractable bitumen and oil on porosity in thermally maturing organic-rich shales. Int. J. Coal Geol., 2014, 132, 38–50.

54. Kerst, M., Andersson, J. T. Microwave-assisted extraction of polycyclic aromatic compounds from coal. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem., 2001, 370(7), 970–972.

55. Sharma, D. K., Dhawan, H. Separative refining of coals through solvolytic extraction under milder conditions: A review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2018, 57(25), 8361–8380.

56. Rapoport, I. B. Artificial Liquid Fuel. Moscow: Publishing House of Petroleum and Mining-Fuel Literature, 1955 (in Russian).

57. Prat, D., Pardigon, O., Flemming, H.-W., Letestu, S., Ducandas, V., Isnard, P., Guntrum, E., Senac, T., Ruisseau, S., Cruciani, P., Hosek, P. Sanofi’s solvent selection guide: A step toward more sustainable processes. Org. Process Res. Dev., 2013, 17(12), 1517–1525.

58. Byrne, F. P., Jin, S., Paggiola, G., Petchey, T. H. M., Clark, J. H., Farmer, T. J., Hunt, A. J., McElroy, C. R., Sherwood, J. Tools and techniques for solvent selection: green solvent selection guides. Sustain. Chem. Process., 2016, 4(7).

59. Wei, N., Xu, D., Hao, B., Guo, S., Guo, Y., Wang, S. Chemical reactions of organic compounds in supercritical water gasification and oxidation. Water Res., 2021, 190, 116634.

60. Akizuki, M., Fujii, T., Hayashi, R., Oshima, Y. Effects of water on reactions for waste treatment, organic synthesis, and bio-refinery in sub- and supercritical water. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 2014, 117(1), 10–18.

61. Chen, J., Wang, Q., Xu, Z., E, J., Leng, E., Zhang, F., Liao, G. Process in supercritical water gasification of coal: A review of fundamentals, mechanisms, catalysts and element transformation. Energy Convers. Manag., 2021237, 114122.

62. Li, Y., Guo, L., Zhang, X., Jin, H., Lu, Y. Hydrogen production from coal gasification in supercritical water with a continuous flowing system. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2010, 35(7), 3036–3045.

63. Yamaguchi, D., Sanderson, P. J., Lim, S., Aye, L. Supercritical water gasification of Victorian brown coal: Experimental characterisation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2009, 34(8), 3342–3350.

64. Okolie, J. A., Rana, R., Nanda, S., Dalai, A. K., Kozinski, J. A. Supercritical water gasification of biomass: A state-of-the-art review of process parameters, reaction mechanisms and catalysis. Sustain. Energy Fuels, 2019, 3(3), 578–598.

65. Nanda, S., Isen, J., Dalai, A. K., Kozinski, J. A. Gasification of fruit wastes and agro-food residues in supercritical water. Energy Convers. Manag., 2016, 110, 296–306.

66. Jin, H., Lu, Y., Liao, Bo., Guo, L., Zhang, X. Hydrogen production by coal gasification in supercritical water with a fluidized bed reactor. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2010, 35(13), 7151–7160.

67. Ge, Z., Guo, S., Guo, L, Cao, C., Su, X., Jin, H. Hydrogen production by non-catalytic partial oxidation of coal in supercritical water: Explore the way to complete gasification of lignite and bituminous coal. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2013, 38(29), 12786–12794.

68. Wang, S., Guo, Y., Wang, L., Wang, Y., Xu, D., Ma, H. Supercritical water oxidation of coal: Investigation of operating parameters’ effects, reaction kinetics and mechanism. Fuel Process. Technol., 2011, 92(3), 291–297.

69. Adschiri, T., Sato, T., Shibuichi, H., Fang, Z., Okazaki, S., Arai, K. Extraction of Taiheiyo coal with supercritical water–HCOOH mixture. Fuel, 2000, 79(3–4), 243–248.

70. Lan, R., Jin, H., Guo, L., Ge, Z., Guo, S., Zhang, X. Hydrogen production by catalytic gasification of coal in supercritical water. Energy Fuels 2014, 28(11),6911–6917.

71. Jin, H., Chen, Y., Ge, Z., Liu, S., Ren, C., Guo, L. Hydrogen production by Zhundong coal gasification in supercritical water. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2015, 40(46), 16096–16103.

72. Jin, H., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Wu, Z., Li, X. Influence of Stefan flow on the drag coefficient and heat transfer of a spherical particle in a supercritical water cross flow. Phys. Fluids, 2021, 33(2), 023313.

73. Jin, H., Guo, L., Guo, J., Ge, Z., Cao, C., Lu, Y. Study on gasification kinetics of hydrogen production from lignite in supercritical water. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2015, 40(24), 7523–7529.

74. Jin, H., Zhao, X., Guo, S., Cao, C., Guo, L. Investigation on linear description of the char conversion for the process of supercritical water gasification of Yimin lignite. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2016, 41(36), 16070–16076.

75. Cao, C., Guo, L., Yin, J., Jin, H., Cao, W., Jia, Y., Yao, X. Supercritical water gasification of coal with waste black liquor as inexpensive additives. Energy Fuels, 2015, 29(1), 384–391.

76. Jin, H., Lu, Y., Guo, L., Cao, C., Zhang, X. Hydrogen production by partial oxidative gasification of biomass and its model compounds in supercritical water. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2010, 35(7), 3001–3010.

77. Muangrat, R., Onwudili, J. A., Williams, P. T. Reaction products from the subcritical water gasification of food wastes and glucose with NaOH and H2O2.Bioresour. Technol., 2010, 101(17), 6812–6821.

78. Kersten, S. R. A., Potic, B., Prins, W., Van Swaaij, W. P. M. Gasification of model compounds and wood in hot compressed water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2006, 45(12), 4169–4177.

79. Lu, Y., Guo, L., Ji, C., Zhang, X., Hao, X., Yan, Q. Hydrogen production by biomass gasification in supercritical water: A parametric study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2006, 31(7), 822–831.

80. Wang, J., Takarada, T. Role of calcium hydroxide in supercritical water gasifi-cation of low-rank coal. Energy Fuels, 2001, 15(2), 356–362.

81. Ge, Z., Jin, H., Guo, L. Hydrogen production by catalytic gasification of coal in supercritical water with alkaline catalysts: Explore the way to complete gasification of coal. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2014, 39(34), 19583–19592.

82. De Heer, J. The principle of Le Chatelier and Braun. J. Chem. Educ., 1957, 34(8), 375–380.

83. Peterson, A. A., Vogel, F., Lachance, R. P., Fröling, M., Antal, Jr., M. J., Tester, J. W. Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: A review of sub- and supercritical water technologies. Energy Environ. Sci., 2008, 1, 32–65.

84. Guan, Q., Mao, T., Zhang, Q., Miao, R., Ning, P., Gu, J., Tian, S., Chen, Q., Chai, X. Catalytic gasification of lignin with Ni/Al2O3–SiO2 in sub/supercritical water. J. Supercrit. Fluids, 2014, 95, 413–421.

85. Zhu, C., Guo, L., Jin, H., Huang, J., Li, S., Lian, X. Effects of reaction time and catalyst on gasification of glucose in supercritical water: Detailed reaction pathway and mechanisms. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2016, 41(16), 6630–6639.

86. Yamaguchi, A., Hiyoshi, N., Sato, O., Shirai, M. Gasification of organosolv-lignin over charcoal supported noble metal salt catalysts in supercritical water. Top. Catal., 2012, 55(11–13), 889–896.

87. Monte, M., Gamarra, D., López Cámara, A., Rasmussen, S. B., Gyorffy, N., Schay, Z., Martinez-Arias, A., Conesa, J. C. Preferential oxidation of CO in excess Hover CuO/CeO2 catalysts: Performance as a function of the copper coverage and exposed face present in the CeO2 support. Catal. Today, 2014, 229, 104–113.

88. Yu, J., Lu, X., Shi, Y., Chen, Q., Guan, Q., Ning, P., Tian, S., Gu, J. Catalytic gasification of lignite in supercritical water with Ru/CeO2–ZrO2Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2016, 41(8), 4579–4591.

89. Guan, Q., Huang, X., Liu, J., Gu, J., Miao, R., Chen, Q., Ning, P. Supercritical water gasification of phenol using a Ru/CeO2 catalyst. Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 283, 358–365.

90. Chang, Z., Chu, M., Zhang, C., Bai, S., Ma, L. Investigation of the effect of selected transition metal salts on the pyrolysis of Huadian oil shale, China. Oil Shale, 2017, 34(4), 354–367.

91. Kang, S., Sun, Y., Deng, S., Li, S., Su, Y., Guo, W., Li, J. Extraction of Huadian oil shale in subcritical FeCl2 solution. Fuel Process. Technol., 2021, 211, 106571.

92. Kang, S., Sun, Y., Qiao, M., Li, S., Deng, S., Guo, W., Li, J., He, W. The enhancement on oil shale extraction of FeCl3 catalyst in subcritical water. Energy, 2022, 238, Part A, 121763.

93. Liang, X., Zhao, Q., Dong, Y., Guo, L., Jin, Z., Liu, Q. Experimental investigation on supercritical water gasification of organic-rich shale with low maturity for syngas production. Energy Fuels, 2021, 35(9), 7657–7665.

94. Nasyrova, Z. R., Kayukova, G. P., Vakhin, A. V., Djimasbe, R., Chemodanov, A. E. Heavy oil hydrocarbons and kerogen destruction of carbonate–siliceous domanic shale rock in sub- and supercritical water. Processes, 2020, 8(7), 800.

95. Lu, Y., Wang, Z., Kang, Z., Li, W., Yang, D., Zhao, Y. Comparative study on the pyrolysis behavior and pyrolysate characteristics of Fushun oil shale during anhydrous pyrolysis and sub/supercritical water pyrolysis. RSC Adv., 2022, 12(26), 16329–16341.

96. Abourriche, A., Oumam, M., Mansouri, S., Mouiya, M., Rakcho, Y., Benhammou, A., Abouliatim, Y., Alami, J., Hannache, H. Effect of processing conditions on the improvement of properties and recovering yield of Moroccan oil shale. Oil Shale, 2022, 39(1), 61–78.

97. Chham, A., Khouya, E., Abourriche, A. K., Oumam, M., Gmouh, S., Mansouri, S., El Harti, M., Hannache, H.. Supercritical water extraction and characterization of Moroccan shale oil by different solvent. J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 2018, 9(6), 1771–1778.

98. Saeed, S. A., Taura, U., Al-Wahaibi, Y., Al-Muntaser, A. A., Yuan, C., Varfolomeev, M. A., Al-Bahry, S., Joshi, S., Djimasbe, R., Suwaid, M. A., Kadyrov, R. I., Galeev, R, I., Naabi, A., Hasani, M., Al Busaidi, R. S. Hydrothermal conversion of oil shale: Synthetic oil generation and micro-scale pore structure change. Fuel, 2022, 312, 122786.

99. Sun, Y., Kang, S., Wang, S., He, L., Guo, W., Li, Q., Deng, S. Subcritical water extraction of Huadian oil shale at 300 °C. Energy Fuels, 2019, 33(3), 2106–2114.

100. Yang, D., Wang, L., Zhao, Y., Kang, Z. Investigating pilot test of oil shale pyrolysis and oil and gas upgrading by water vapor injection. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 2021, 196, 108101.

101. Fomitšov, M. Low-temperature supercritical conversion of kukersite oil shale. Oil Shale, 2019, 36(2S), 171–178.

102. Yang, T., Zhou, B., Li, R., Li, B., Zhang, W., Kai, X. Liquefaction of oil shale in supercritical ethanol. Oil Shale, 2018, 35(3), 279–289.

103. Zhang, G., Ranjith, P. G., Li, Z., Gao, M., Ma, Z. Long-term effects of CO2-water-coal interactions on structural and mechanical changes of bituminous coal. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 2021, 207, 109093.

104. Yu, H., Xu, H., Fu, W., Lu, X., Chen, Z., Qi, S., Wang, Y., Yang, W., Lu, J. Extraction of shale oil with supercritical CO2: Effects of number of fractures and injection pressure. Fuel, 2021, 285, 118977.

105. Cheng, Y., Zhang, X., Lu, Z., Pan, Z. jun, Zeng, M., Du, X., Xiao, S. The effect of subcritical and supercritical CO2 on the pore structure of bituminous coals. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 2021, 94, 104132.

Back to Issue