eesti teaduste
akadeemia kirjastus
SINCE 1984
Oil Shale cover
Oil Shale
ISSN 1736-7492 (Electronic)
ISSN 0208-189X (Print)
Impact Factor (2020): 0.934


Full article in PDF format | doi: 10.3176/oil.2015.4.06



The aim of this paper is to examine the role of the public perception of oil shale mining and industrial heritage in regional revival. Oil shale mining and chemical operations have left an imprint on both the people and the landscape of Ida-Viru County, NE Estonia. Along with increasing or decreasing production volumes of oil shale mining, heritage has been over­looked, left to naturally deteriorate or to be destroyed or recultivated. Heritage-awareness revival projects for similar natural resource post-industrial situations have proved to be successful in culture, sports and recreational tourism. The current view on oil shale mining heritage is investigated through focus group interviews and a questionnaire. Unemploy­ment, language barriers and social problems are considered to be the most important issues, and the responsibility for solving these problems is primarily deemed to be the role of the national government. At the same time, in general, people are willing to participate in processes and regard coordinated planning as crucial to holistic development. Post-industrial areas should be utilized to support the development.


  1. Kattai, V., Saadre, T., Savitski, L., Kaljo, D. Estonian Oil Shale: Geology, Resource, Mining. Akadeemia Trükk, Tallinn, 2000 (in Estonian).

  2. Reinsalu, E. Oil shale and its use. In: Mining and Rehabilitation in Estonia (Kaar, E., Kiviste, K., eds.). Ecoprint, Tartu, 2010, 6–13 (in Estonian, summary in English).

  3. Reinsalu, E. Environmental impact of underground oil shale mining. In: Mining and Rehabilitation in Estonia (Kaar, E., Kiviste, K., eds.). Ecoprint, Tartu, 2010, 267–270 (in Estonian, summary in English).

  4. Metsaots, K., Printsmann, A., Sepp, K. Public opinions on oil shale mining heritage and its tourism potential. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour.,

  5. Kaar, E., Lainoja, L., Luik, H., Raid, L., Vaus, M. Recultivation of Oil Shale Quarries. Valgus, Tallinn, 1971 (in Estonian).

  6. Sepp, K., Metsaots, K., Roose, A. Appreciating and redeveloping landscapes changed in the course of mining operations. In: Mining and Rehabilitation in Estonia (Kaar, E., Kiviste, K., eds.). Ecoprint, Tartu, 2010, 105–128 (in Estonian, summary in English).

  7. Luud, A., Pensa, M. Alternatives of reforesting oil shale opencasts in Estonia. Oil Shale, 2004, 21(1), 3–11.

  8. Luud, A., Liblik, V., Sepp, M. Landscape evaluation in industrial areas. Oil Shale, 2003, 20(1), 25–32.

  9. Pensa, M., Sellin, A., Luud, A., Valgma, I. An analysis of vegetation restoration on opencast oil shale mines in Estonia. Restor. Ecol., 2004, 12(2), 200–206.

10. Kahru, A., Põllumaa, L. Environmental impact of open depositions of solid waste from Estonian oil shale industry: ecotoxicological aspects. In: Abstract book: International Oil Shale Symposium, June 8–11, 2009, Tallinn, Estonia, 40–41.

11. Šommet, J. Sustainability assessment of Estonian oil shale mining. Oil Shale, 2013, 30(2S), 363–370.

12. Pensa, M., Karu, H., Luud, A., Rull, E., Vaht, R. The effect of planted tree species on the development of herbaceous vegetation in a reclaimed opencast. Can. J. Forest Res., 2008, 38(10), 2674–2686.

13. Karu, V., Valgma, I., Kolats, M. Mine water as a potential source of energy from underground mined areas in Estonian oil shale deposit. Oil Shale, 2013, 30(2S), 336–362.

14. Karu, V. Potential Usage of Underground Mined Areas in Estonian Oil Shale Deposit. PhD Thesis. Tallinn University of Technology, 2012.

15. Davoudi, S., Strange, I. Space and place in twentieth-century planning: an analytical framework and an historical review. In: Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning (Davoudi, S., Strange, I., eds.). Routledge, London, 2009, 7–42.

16. Ferreira, A., Sykes, O. Batey, P. Planning theory or planning theories? The Hydra Model and its implications for planning education. J. Educ. Built Env., 2009, 4(2), 29–54.

17. Healey, P. Collaborative planning in perspective. Plann. Theor., 2003, 2(2), 101–123.

18. Lane, M. B. Public participation in planning: an intellectual history. Aust. Geogr., 2005, 36(3), 283–299.

19. Gentile, M., Sjöberg, Ö. Intra-urban landscapes of priority: the Soviet legacy. Europe-Asia Stud., 2006, 58(5), 701–729.

20. Jupp, V. The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods. SAGE Publication Ltd., 2006.

21. Lauristin, M., Kaal, E., Kirss, L., Kriger, T., Masso, A., Nurmela, K., Sep­pel, K., Tammaru, T., Uus, M., Vihalemm, P., Vihalemm, T. Estonian Integra­tion Monitoring 2011. Estonian Ministry of Culture, 2011.

22. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Baltic song and dance celebrations. 2014. (accessed 28 September 2014).

23. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Nord-Pas de Calais Mining Basin. 2014. (accessed 25 September 2014).

24. Bergeron, L. The heritage of industrial society. In: Industrial Heritage Re-tooled: The TICCIH guide to Industrial Heritage Conservation (Duet, J., ed.). Latitude Press, China, 2012, 31–37.

25. SEE. IBA-Halbzeitdokumentation 2000-2010. (Kuhn, R., ed.). INPETHO® Medien-produktion GmbH, 2005.

26. Ideenlaboratorium Völklinger Hütte. 2014. (accessed 25 September 2014).

27. EAS. Enterprise Estonia. 2014. (accessed 15 September 2014).

28. Garage48. 2014. (accessed 25 September 2014).

29. Let’s do it! World Cleanup: Let’s clean the world together! 2014. http:// (accessed 25 September 2014).

Back to Issue