Oil shales used in Estonian power plants to generate electricity and in oil production are of different quality. Different excavation methods in use and accompanying development processes are accompanied by various emissions that can pollute water and air. However, generation of waste as well as impact on land use are of greater concern than emissions into the water and atmosphere.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has proved to be one of the most attractive approaches to characterize sustainability of mining industry, as several environmental and economic indicators are used to assess its performance. The methodology enables to choose the best available environmentally friendly technology.
As shown by investigations, the mining processes exerts smaller effect on acidification, terrestrial eutrophication and ecotoxicity than production of auxiliary materials and transportation of oil shale to customers. Other impacts considered and discussed are ground surface subsidence, land use for deposited wastes and mine water pollution.
Assessment of the impact caused by a combination of different mining processes gives the opportunity to find a better way for planning new mines in accordance with environment protection measures in the area of the Estonia oil shale deposit.
1. Jaber, J. O., Probert, S. D. Environmental-impact assessment for the proposed oil-shale integrated tri-generation plant // Applied Energy. 1999. Vol. 62, No. 3. P. 169–209.
doi:10.1016/S0306-2619(99)00006-9
2. Talve, S., Põld, E., Koskela, S., Sokka, L., Hiltunen, M.-R., Seppälä, J. Task 1 of OSELCA project: Life Cycle Assessment of Oil Shale Electricity. www.energia.ee/OSELCA 2005.
3. Nikitin, O., Sabanov, S. Immediate roof stability analysis for new room-and-pillar mining technology in “Estonia”mine // Proceedings of the 5th international scientific and practical conference. Latvia, 2005. P. 262–269.
4. Nikitin, O., Väli, E., Sabanov, S., Pastarus, J.-R. The surface miner sustainable technology introduction for oil-shale mining in Estonia // Environment Technology Resources. 6th International Scientific and Practical Conference / G. Noviks, V. Morozov, R. Tepfers, W. Leal, T. Chrzan (eds.). Rezekne, Latvia: RA Izdevnieciba, 2007. P. 55–61.
5. Durucan, S., Korre, A., Munoz-Melendez, G. Mining life cycle modelling: a cradle-to-gate approach to environmental management in the minerals industry // J. Clean. Prod. 2006. Vol. 14, No. 12–13. P. 1057–1070.
doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.12.021
6. ISO 14042. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Life cycle impact assessment.International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2000.
7. ISO 14040. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1997.
8. ISO 14041. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1998.
9. Seppälä, J., Posch, M., Johansson, M., Hettelingh, J.-P. Country-dependent characterisation factors for acidification and terrestrial eutrophication based on accumulated exceedance as an impact category indicator // Int. J. LCA. 2006. 11 LCA (6). P. 403–416.
10. Amann, M., Cofala, J., Heyes, C., Klimont, Z., Schööpp, W. The RAINS model: A tool for assessing regional emission control strategies in Europe // Pollution Atmosphérique. 1999, 20. P. 41–46.
11. EMEP. Transboundary acidifying air pollution in Europe. EMEP/MSC-W Report 1/98, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, 1998.
12. Hettelingh, J.-P., Posch, M., Slootweg, J. (eds.)Critical loads and dynamic modelling results. CCE Progress Report, 2004. Coordination Center for Effects, RIVM Report 259101014, Bilthoven, Netherlands, 2004: Vol. 134.
13. Hauschild, M., Potting, J.. Human toxicity and ecotoxicity // Background for spatial differentiation in life cycle assessment – the EDIP 2003 methodology / J. Potting, M. Hauschild (eds.). Institute of Product Development, Copenhagen,2004.
14. Seppälä, J., Koskela, S., Sokka, L., Talve, S., Põld, E., Hiltunen, M.-L. Comparison of the environmental performances of oil shale and coal electricity: life cycle impact assessment and interpretation. A report of the EU-Life project, OSELCA, 2005. Available at www.energia.ee/OSELCA.
15. Pastarus, J.-R., Sabanov, S. A method for monitoring working mining block stability in Estonian oil shale mines // Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Eng. 2005. Vol. 11, No. 1. P. 59–68.
16. Reinsalu, E., Toomik, A., Valgma, I. Mined-out Land.. – TUT. Department of Mining, 2002. 97 pp. [in Estonian].
17. Homepage Eesti Põlevkivi. www.ep.ee (19.08.2006)
18. Ida-Viru District. Human Impact on Environment / J.-M. Punning (ed.). Institute of Ecology and Marine Research, Estonian Academy of Sciences. Tallinn, 1991.
