This study employs the computational particle fluid dynamic model to simulate a 65 t/h oil shale-fired high-low differential velocity circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boiler. The effects of the excess air ratio on furnace temperature, gas composition, particle residence time, and pollutant emissions were analyzed. Results show that an excess air ratio of 1.10 intensifies particle back-mixing, enhancing combustion while reducing NO and SO2 emissions. The optimal condition combines this ratio with a 1.5:1 main/side bed air distribution, achieving the lowest emissions. This work provides valuable insights for optimizing CFB boiler operation.
1. Qing, W., Liu, H., Bai, J., Qin, H., Yang, W. Application of high-low bed CFB combustion technology to oil shale combustion. Oil Shale, 2013, 30(2), 147–156.
https://doi.org/10.3176/oil.2013.2.05
2. Wang, Q., Xiao, J. B., Liu, H. P. 2D CFD simulation of hydrodynamics of the dense zone of a 65 t/h high-low bed CFB. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 614–615, 596–599.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.614-615.596
3. Zhao, P. (P.), O’Rourke, P. J., Snider, D. Three-dimensional simulation of liquid injection, film formation and transport, in fluidized beds. Particuology, 2009, 7(5), 337–346.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2009.07.002
4. O’Rourke, P. J., Zhao, P. (P.), Snider, D. A model for collisional exchange in gas/liquid/solid fluidized beds. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009, 64(8), 1784–1797.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.12.014
5. Snider, D. M., Clark, S. M., O’Rourke, P. J. Eulerian–Lagrangian method for three-dimensional thermal reacting flow with application to coal gasifiers. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(6), 1285–1295.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.12.042
6. O’Rourke, P. J., Snider, D. M. An improved collision damping time for MP-PIC calculations of dense particle flows with applications to polydisperse sedimenting beds and colliding particle jets. Chemical Engineering Science, 2010, 65(22), 6014–6028.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.08.032
7. Abbasi, A., Ege, P. E., de Lasa, H. I. CPFD simulation of a fast fluidized bed steam coal gasifier feeding section. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 174(1), 341–350.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.07.085
8. Loha, C., Chattopadhyay, H., Chatterjee, P. K. Three dimensional kinetic modeling of fluidized bed biomass gasification. Chemical Engineering Science, 2014, 109, 53–64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2014.01.017
9. Ma, Q., Lei, F., Xiao, Y. Numerical analysis of operating conditions for establishing high-density circulating fluidized bed by CPFD method. Powder Technology, 2018, 338, 446–457.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.07.012
10. Tu, Q., Wang, H. CPFD study of a full-loop three-dimensional pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed based on EMMS drag model. Powder Technology, 2018, 323, 534–547.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.09.045
11. Chen, C., Werther, J., Heinrich, S., Qi, H.-Y., Hartge, E.-U. CPFD simulation of circulating fluidized bed risers. Powder Technology, 2013, 235, 238–247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.10.014
12. Liu, H., Li, J., Wang, Q. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of the co-combustion of oil shale retorting solid waste with cornstalk particles in a circulating fluidized bed reactor. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 130, 296–308.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.10.107
13. Liu, H., Li, J., Wang, Q. Simulation of gas–solid flow characteristics in a circulating fluidized bed based on a computational particle fluid dynamics model. Powder Technology, 2017, 321, 132–142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.07.040
14. Wang, Q., Yang, H., Wang, P., Lu, J., Liu, Q., Zhang, H. et al. Application of CPFD method in the simulation of a circulating fluidized bed with a loop seal, part I – determination of modeling parameters. Powder Technology, 2014, 253, 814–821.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.11.041
15. Shi, X., Lan, X., Liu, F., Zhang, Y., Gao, J. Effect of particle size distribution on hydrodynamics and solids back-mixing in CFB risers using CPFD simulation. Powder Technology, 2014, 266, 135–143.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.06.025
16. Lan, X., Shi, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Xu, C., Gao, J. Solids back-mixing behavior and effect of the mesoscale structure in CFB risers. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(34), 11888–11896.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie3034448
17. Yan, J., Lu, X., Xue, R., Lu, J., Zheng, Y., Zhang, Y. et al. Validation and application of CPFD model in simulating gas-solid flow and combustion of a supercritical CFB boiler with improved inlet boundary conditions. Fuel Processing Technology, 2020, 208, 106512.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106512
18. Shen, X., Jia, L., Wang, Y., Guo, B., Fan, H., Qiao, X. et al. Study on dynamic characteristics of residual char of CFB boiler based on CPFD method. Energies, 2020, 13(22), 5883.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225883
19. Auzerais, F. M., Jackson, R., Russel, W. B. The resolution of shocks and the effects of compressible sediments in transient settling. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1988, 195, 437–462.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112088002472
20. Snider, D. M. An incompressible three-dimensional multiphase particle-in-cell model for dense particle flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 170(2), 523–549.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2001.6747
21. Jalali, P., Hyppänen, T. Momentum transport between two granular phases of spherical particles with large size ratio: two-fluid model versus discrete element method. Powder Technology, 2015, 273, 13–18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.12.026
22. Lanza, A., Islam, M. A., de Lasa H. CPFD modeling and experimental validation of gas–solid flow in a down flow reactor. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2016, 90, 79–93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.04.007
23. Snider, D. M., Clark, S. M., O’Rourke, P. J. Eulerian–Lagrangian method for three-dimensional thermal reacting flow with application to coal gasifiers. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(6), 1285–1295.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.12.042
24. de Souza-Santos, M. L. Comprehensive modelling and simulation of fluidized bed boilers and gasifiers. Fuel, 1989, 68(12), 1507–1521.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(89)90288-3
25. Goel, S. K., Morihara, A., Tullin, C. J., Sarofim, A. F. Effect of NO and O2 concentration on N2O formation during coal combustion in a fluidized-bed combustor: modeling results. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1994, 25(1), 1051–1059.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(06)80743-5
26. Liu, H., Feng, B., Lu, J., Zheng, C. Coal property effects on N2O and NOx formation from circulating fluidized bed combustion of coal. Chemical Engineering Communications, 2005, 192(11), 1482–1489.
https://doi.org/10.1080/009864490896043
27. Kilpinen, P., Kallio, S., Konttinen, J., Barišić, V. Char-nitrogen oxidation under fluidised bed combustion conditions: single particle studies. Fuel, 2002, 81(18), 2349–2362.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00176-X
28. Shi, X., Wu, Y., Lan, X., Liu, F., Gao, J. Effects of the riser exit geometries on the hydrodynamics and solids back-mixing in CFB risers: 3D simulation using CPFD approach. Powder Technology, 2015, 284, 130–142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.06.049
29. Zhong, W., Xie, J., Shao, Y., Liu, X., Jin, B. Three-dimensional modeling of olive cake combustion in CFB. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2015, 88, 322–333.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.10.086
