Demonstratives comprise different systems in different Estonian dialect areas. The number of demonstrative pronouns in these systems ranges from one to three. The general tendency seems to be a decrease in the number of demonstrative pronouns in all dialectal varieties. The present article analyses the disintegration of two demonstrative systems. The article will first discuss the transformation of the South Estonian three-term demonstrative system into a two-term system. The remains of the two-term demonstrative system of Standard Estonian will then be analysed on the basis of the occurrence of the demonstrative too, which can probably be explained as a South Estonian influence. What is common to these cases is that the disappearing demonstrative starts to denote a human referent. However, this still happens in different ways and for different reasons.
Andersson, S. R., Keenan, E. L. 1985, Deixis. - Language Typology and Syntactic Description III. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Cambridge, 259-308.
Ariste, P. 1968, A Grammar of the Votic Language, Bloomington (UAS 68).
Diessel, H. 1999, Demonstratives. Form, Function and Grammaticalization, Amsterdam-Philadelphia.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.42
Gundel, J., Hedberg, N., Zacharski, R. 1993, Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse. - Language 69, 274-307.
https://doi.org/10.2307/416535
Etelämäki, M. 2005, Context and Referent in Interaction. - Minimal Reference. The Use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse, Helsinki (SF. Linguistica).
Erelt, M., Kasik, R., Metslang, H., Rajandi, H., Ross, K., Saari, H., Tael, K., Vare, S. 1993, Eesti keele grammatika II. Süntaks. Lisa: kiri, Tallinn (= EKG II).
Hanks, W. F. 1990, Referential Practice. Language and Lived Space among the Maya, Chicago.
Hanks, W. F. 1992. The Indexical Ground of Deictic Reference. - Rethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Cambridge, 43-76.
Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T. R., Alho, I., 2004, Iso suomen kielioppi, Helsinki (SKST 950) (= ISK).
Himmelmann, N. P. 1996, Demonstratives in Narrative Discourse. A Taxonomy of Universal Uses. - Studies in Anaphora, Amsterdam, 205-254.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.33.08him
Kaiser, E., Hiietam, K. 2003, A Comparison of the Referential Properties of the Third Person Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian. - Nordlyd 31, 654-667.
https://doi.org/10.7557/12.31
Laanest, A. 1982, Einführung in die ostseefinnishen Sprachen, Hamburg.
Laitinen, L. 2005, Hän, the Third Speech Act Pronoun in Finnish. - Minimal Reference. The Use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse, Studia Fennica, 75-106.
Larjavaara, M. 1986, Demonstratiivit ja kielen kehitys, Vir., 306-312.
Larjavaara, M. 1990. Suomen deiksis, Helsinki (Suomi 156).
Laury, R. 1997, Demonstratives in Interaction, Amsterdam-Philadelphia.
https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.7
Pajusalu, R. 1997, Is There an Article in (Spoken) Estonian? - Estonian Typological Studies II, Tartu (Tartu Ülikooli eesti keele õppetooli toimetised 8), 146-177.
Pajusalu, R. 1998, Eesti pronoomeneid II. Võru sjoo, taa ja tuu. - KK, 159-172.
Pajusalu, R. 2001, Definite and Indefinite Determiners in Estonian. - Pragmatics in 2000. Selected Papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerpen, 458-469.
Pajusalu, R. 2005, Anaphoric pronouns in spoken Estonian. - Minimal Reference. The Use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse, Helsinki (SF. Linguistica), 107-134.
Pajusalu, R., Tragel, I., Veismann, A., Vija, M. 2004, Eesti keele tuumsõnade semantikat ja pragmaatikat, Tartu (Tartu Ülikooli üldkeeleteaduse õppetooli toimetised 5).
Seppänen, E.-L. 1998, Läsnäolon pronominit, Helsinki.
Siewierska, A. 2004, Person, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812729
Tauli, V. 1966, Structural Tendencies in Uralic Languages, Bloomington—The Hague (UAS 17).
Varteva, A. 1998, Pronominit hän ja tämä tekstissä. - Vir., 202-221.
