This article addresses the issue of noun phrase coordination in Beserman Udmurt. I consider monosyndetic/bisyndetic no and single/double comitative constructions as main competing strategies for noun phrase coordination in Beserman Udmurt. Syntactic tests show that monosyndetic/bisyndetic no and single/double comitative with plural verbal agreement are coordinating structures while the single comitative structure with singular verbal agreement is a case of subordination. The choice between conjunctive and comitative structures is affected by animacy, number, and syntactic function of coordinands. Elicitational data shows that bisyndetic no is used for emphatic coordination, since it cannot be used with collective predicates. In case of the single comitative marking, the number agreement on a verb is defined by the predicate type and the information structure of an utterance. Coordination of nouns in non-subject function is typically formed by using the asyndetic or syndetic strategy. Double comitative coordination of nouns in non-subject function is only possible under the case compounding strategy, although this strategy causes the speakers some difficulties.
Abdoulaye M. L. 2004, Comitative, Coordinating, and Inclusory Constructions in Hausa. - Coordinating Constructions. Amsterdam-Philadelphia (Typological Studies in Language 58), 165-193.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.58.10abd
Arkhangelskiy, T., Usacheva, M. 2018, Case compounding in Beserman Udmurt. - ESUKA 9-1, 111-138.
https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2018.9.1.05
Arkhipov, A. 2009, Comitative as a Cross-Linguistically Valid Category. - New Challenges in Typology. Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions, Berlin-New York (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 217), 223-246.
Forker, D. 2016, Toward a Typology for Additive Markers. - Lingua 180, 69-100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.008
Haspelmath, M. 2004, Coordinating Constructions: An Overview. - Coordinating Constructions, Amsterdam-Philadelphia (Typological Studies in Language 58), 3-39.
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.58.03has
Kaysina, I. 2013, The Adoption of Russian Conjunctions in Udmurt. - ESUKA 4-2, 131-144.
https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2013.4.2.07
Overstreet, M., Yule, G. 1997, On Being Inexplicit and Stuff in Contemporary American English. - Journal of English Linguistics 25, 250-258.
https://doi.org/10.1177/007542429702500307
Ross J. R. 1967, Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, [Cambridge, MA].
Stassen, L. 2000, AND-Languages and WITH-Languages. - Linguistic Typology 4, 1-54.
https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.1
Stassen, L. 2013, Noun Phrase Conjunction. - The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Leipzig, http://wals.info/chapter/63.
Vaillette, N. 1998, The Distributive Entailments of Collecive Predicates. - Proceedings of the Third ESSLLI Student Session. 30th European Summer School in Logic, Language & Information, Sofia, 257-268.
Wälchli, B. 2005, Co-Compounds and Natural Coordination, Oxford (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory).
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276219.001.0001
Winkler, E. 2012, Udmurtische Grammatik, Wiesbaden (Veröfferntlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica. Band 81).
Архангельский Т. А., Бирюк О. Л., Идрисов Р. И. 2015, Бесермянский корпус. http://beserman.ru/corpus/search/?interface_language=ru.
Архангельский Т. А. 2017, Бесермянский мультимедийный корпус. http://linghub.ru/beserman_multimedia/search.
Архипов А. В. 2009, Типология комитативных конструкций, Москва.
Кельмаков В. К. 1998, Краткий курс удмуртской диалектологии, Ижевск.
Кондратьева Н. В. 2011, Категория падежа имени существительного в удмуртском языке, Ижевск.
Люкина Н. М. 2008, Особенности языка балезинских и юкаменских бесермян (сравнительная характеристика). Диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата филологических наук, Ижевск.
Майтинская К. Е. 2010, Служебные слова в финно-угорских языках, Москва.
Некрасова Г. А. 2015, Конкуренция в семантической зоне инструменталя в коми-пермяцком языке. - Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия: Лингвистика и межкультурная коммуникация 1, 59-63.
Серебренников Б. А. 1963, Историческая морфология пермских языков, Москва.
Тепляшина Т. И. 1970, Язык бесермян, Москва.
